I previously proposed in this column the idea that Muslim scholars should attempt to differentiate between the prophets mentioned in the Holy Quran and the prophets of the Jews who are mentioned in the Torah, since any history student in any major Western university (but not an Arab university) will learn that Jewish history is only an amalgamation of biblical myths about prophets, kings and kingdoms that never existed.
In the simplest possible terms, the Israelis have been looking for their “traces” in Palestine for the last 62 years without finding anything so far, to the extent that Israeli archaeologists have stopped looking in Jerusalem. Moshe Dayan, an amateur archaeologist himself, looked for 13 years in the Sinai for the traces of his “ancestors”, but found nothing whatsoever related to Moses or the Wandering Years.
I am well aware of the sensitivity of this subject, and it is for this reason that I only propose an idea and let the Muslim scholars – and I mean Muslim archaeologists and historians and not theologians – to confirm or deny what I and my son studied, in an American and a British university respectively.
Israel’s advocates are so insolent, meanwhile, or obscene, that they actually forge and falsify a modern history that we have lived and seen ourselves. It is thus no wonder that they invented a religion to steal a land from its owners. Recently, I followed four episodes on a U.S. Likudnik website which relied on a French Likudnik website as its source, and which concluded that the child Muhammad al-Durrah was not shot dead by Israeli soldiers while in his father’s lap in Gaza in 2000 and that the footage that the French television and the world media carried, showing the child and his father, was not true.
I suffice myself with the above on that subject, and move on with the Israeli peace advocate Uri Avnery, and his article published on August 16, 2009, which was inspired by a dispute between Palestinian residents of Acre and the Jews there, following a decision by the government to remove all Arab names and keep the (fabricated and falsified) Jewish names which are to be written in Hebrew. Thus, for example, Jerusalem became Urshalim. In Acre, the Jewish-dominated municipality threatened to destroy the monument of the Muslim diver Issa al Awwam who fought with Salah al-Din…But then if Muhammad al-Durrah did not exist in 2000, then why would they acknowledge Issa al-Awwam who lived 800 years before him?
Avnery cites the Book of Joshua in the Bible, describing it as being ‘genocidal’, which is true, since the book mentions that the Lord told Joshua to kill “both man and woman, young and old”. But despite the events of the Book of Joshua, Avnery says that Acre remained a Phoenician city like the rest of the coast of Palestine.
The writer wonders who came to the land of Canaan first, and replies that the Arabs had conquered the land which they called Jund Filistin (military district Palestine) in 635 A.D, and that they ruled it since then without interruption except during the Crusader period. On the other hand, the Zionist version claims that the land belonged to the kingdoms of Judea and Israel, although the coast was Phoenician. Avnery carries on by saying that despite all the unrelenting efforts over a hundred years, no archaeological evidence has been found that there ever was an exodus from Egypt, a conquest of Canaan by the Children of Israel, or a kingdom of David and Solomon.
The article after that speaks of the “legends” of the Torah about Abraham in Iraq and the exodus from Egypt, the Conquest of Canaan, King David, and the other legends of the Bible, “which are taught as actual history”, and then the destruction of the Temple and the “exile” of the Jews and their persecution.
Uri Avnery is neither an Arab nor a Muslim. He is an Israeli who served in the Israeli army before becoming a prominent peace activist, and is also a researcher and an authority on the history of the entire region.
I do not ask the Arabs and the Muslims to approve of anything I said above, but only to ask their scholars to study the subject and then enlighten us all.
If they fail to do so, we might find ourselves reading a history where Muhammad al-Durrah was not killed, where Jesus committed suicide (I cannot even insinuate at what the Talmud says about the Virgin Mary), and where Muslims attacked the Jews in Palestine in 1948 to uproot them from their own country. A history where there were and there are no Palestinians (recall what Golda Meir and other ultra-Zionists said), where Egypt attacked the Negev in 1956 instead of Israel attacking Sinai, where Arab armies attacked Israel in 1967 and so Israel had to respond in self-defense (I swore that I read this in their writings as I read that the United Nations is ‘Muslim’), where Hezbollah invaded Israel in the summer of 2006, and where Hamas attempted to invade Ashkelon two years later. We might also read that Israel did not kill 1500 Palestinian minors in this decade alone, compared to 135 Israeli minors, that B’Tselem’s figures are false and that it is infiltrated or that B’Tselem lies like all peace activists around the world, including Jews, and maybe even that this article itself does not exist except in the readers’ imaginations.
Source article by Jihad el-Khazen can be found here. I originally found it here.
P.S. They are the best liars the world has ever seen. They are liars par excellence.
Monday, January 3, 2011
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Israel's Last Law: Who's a Jew, Who's Not a Jew
The Last Law
The last law the Knesset will apparently legislate during 2010 is meant to regulate the Giur process in the IDF. It would have been difficult to imagine a better symbol for the sad state of the Israeli society. This law and the ongoing struggle around it touches the heart of the problem: a group of regular people defining themselves as chosen and basing that on a Book that states otherwise.
Ruth
Ruth is a key figure in the Old Testament. The book named after her tells the story of a Moabite woman which marries an Israelite. Following his death in Moab (on the eastern shore of the Dead Sea), she decided to return with Naomi – her mother in law – to Bethlehem. When Naomi tells her to go back to her home – after all she has no more sons to offer to Ruth – the last says: “Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God” (Ruth 1:16).
With this answer, Ruth became the most famous “giyoret” ever. The masculine form of this word – namely “ger” - means “stranger” but is kept by Pharisaic-rabbinical Jews for converts to Judaism. The process is thus known as “giur,” which ironically means “becoming a stranger.” This is a subtle reminder that Pharisees never truly accept converts; as a matter of fact, converts cannot marry with orthodox Jews.
Bethlehem doesn’t make a lucky appearance in Ruth’s story. By later marrying Boaz, Ruth became one of the ancestors of King David and thus also of Jesus. This was God’s way to remind us His message was meant for all regardless our ethnic background. Galatians 3:28: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Considering this, the issue of “giur” was to become a major problem for Israel.
Giur in Israel
As extensively commented in The Cross of Bethlehem, one’s rights in Israel depend on his – or hers – religion and ethnic group. These are listed by the Ministry of Interior, which defines one religion as per the religion of his parents. Changing that is almost impossible. Even if a formal change would be ruled by the court, the records would be kept. Moreover, the ID number would continue to reflect the opinion of the Ministry of Interior and not the will of the individual. Without a Constitution to defend them, basic human rights are systematically abused by the Israeli administration.
The only giur accepted in Israel is the one performed by Orthodox Jews via the Chief Rabbinate. Reform and Conservative converts are not recognized, unless they converted outside Israel. The main groups passing through the Orthodox process – which includes body mutilation for men – are Russian and Ethiopian people that arrived to Israel during the late 1980s and the 1990s. Many of them choose to pass the event during their service in the IDF. Why? Simply, it’s easier there. Military rabbis are less strict. “I order you to be a Jew!” they say and it’s done. Well, almost so.
That’s the problem the Knesset is trying to solve nowadays. Shas – the main Sephardic Orthodox party in Netanyahu’s coalition – wants the process to become stricter, as in its secular counterpart. Yisrael Beiteinu - Avigdor Lieberman’s party and also a coalition member – wants to ease the process, since the converted soldiers are an important source for new settlers in the West Bank. Netanyahu has become a sterile mule trapped between an unholy alliance between Zionists and Pharisees.
Would the new law favour Pharisaic Shas or Ultra-Nationalist Yisrael Beiteinu? It doesn’t matter, Israel would remain a highly racist society.
Source article can be found here.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Kairos Palestine
Good will triumph over zionism. The question is, where do you stand in the fight against it? Are you silent about what is obviously the greatest evil of our time? Are you indifferent to the suffering of others? Do you care about truth and justice? What are you doing about it?
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Merry Jewish Supremacist Christmas
Nablus: Israel gives villagers 24 hours to hit the road before leveling Tana
Israeli authorities have given the people of the east Nablus village of Tana 24 hours to evacuate their homes before demolishing them, and threatened to confiscate their livestock when the deadline falls, sources in Nablus said. [Source]
The same thing has been the hallmark of 63 years of Naqba.
"The acts of Jewish terrorism that had marked the final months of the British Mandate (when Jews were blowing up British buildings in Palestine, hanging British soldiers, mailing time-bombs to members of the British cabinet) seemed like mere schoolboy pranks when the Jews went to work on the Arabs.
One million Arabs, both Muslim and Christian, residents of Palestine were forced to flee their ancestral homes ~ the orchards, pastures, and farms their people had worked for centuries. And as Archbishop George Hakim of Galilee insisted: “They were terrorized out.”
The persuasive device employed by the Jews was simple: they massacred one whole Arab village; then they sent a sound-truck through all the neighboring villages, promising each one the same fate unless the people evacuated their homes immediately."
And also this from below from 1955: "A communique from Brother Anthony Bruya, O. F. M., on the plight of the town of Rameh, bears vivid witness to the special hatred which has been shown to Catholics in the Holy Land. Israeli forces occupied Rameh, a two-thirds Christian community, and while permitting the Muslim Arabs to stay, ordered all Catholics to “leave within half an hour.”
To back up the order, the Israeli commander reminded the Christian townspeople of what had happened to the residents of Deir Assin and Tireh ~ who were massacred in the streets for daring to question the authority of a Jewish army leader.
Similar atrocities have taken place in Haifa, Sheframr, Maslia, Tarshiha, and a hundred other places. But perhaps the most touching and tragic report is the one dated January 15, 1952, in which Archbishop George Hakim of Galilee protested in vain to the Israeli government over the mass destruction of the totally Catholic village of Ikret. Church, schools, rectory, homes ~ everything was in shambles. And what is more, wrote the Archbishop, the Jews perpetrated all this on Christmas Day itself." [Source]
The Rejected People of Scripture: Why Jews Fear the Bible
The prime incentive for reading God’s word is always, of course, just that: it is God’s word — the thundering, inspired account of man’s long climb from Genesis to Apocalypse; how he fell from grace, how he was redeemed, what he must do to be saved.
But there is another reason also why now, particularly, we ought to take our Scriptures off the shelves. The notion has got around (at whose prompting, we will let you guess) that the Bible is a book which celebrates the Jews; and that since we Catholics are supposed to reverence the Bible, we ought also to honor the race to whom it is devoted.
The number of people who have been deceived by this artful dodge indicates one thing: how crass and colossal is our present-day ignorance of Holy Scripture.
No one could possibly read the seventy-two books which constitute God’s revelation and conclude that Jews deserve the esteem of Catholics. For albeit the Bible presents Jewish history, it is not the sort of history the Anti-Defamation League would approve. It is the story of how a few faithful Jews in each generation championed God against the rest of their race — a proud, stubborn, ungrateful, and unbelieving multitude. Far from promoting love for the Jews, the Bible is thus the font of Christian anti-Jewishness. No other book gives such a strong, sure taste of their perfidy.
It is in the New Testament that the Jews are shown at their ultimate worst — when they are confronted with the Messias, reject Him, crucify Him, call down His Blood as a curse upon them, and then do their utmost to prevent His gospel from being spread through the world. A partial report on this New-Testament portrayal of the Jews appears below. But even under the Old Law it is evident what the Jews are coming to. Prophet after prophet castigates them for their wickedness and warns them that they are going to be rejected by God in favor of the Gentiles; and prophet after prophet is killed by the Jews in defiant retort. As early as the book of Exodus, God has said to Moses: “See that this people is stiff-necked. Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them: and I will make of thee a great nation.” (Exodus 32:9)
Plainly, it is not for their own sakes, or for any goodness inherent in the race, that the Jews are kept at the center of the Old-Testament stage. It is, rather, because through some Jews — a holy, beleaguered handful, like Moses and Joshua and David and the prophets — the true Faith is kept alive down to the time of Our Lord. And the other reason for God’s sustained interest in the Jews is that eventually from their thorny midst there will blossom His one perfect creature, the Virginal Mother of His Son.
But if the Jews make such a poor showing in the Old Testament, how do they bear to read it? The answer is, they don’t. Their religious reading time is devoted to a post-Crucifixion book of their own devising, the Talmud. The Jews have rejected the first part of Holy Scripture as surely and as violently as they have rejected the second. Nor is it merely the treatment of their ancestors that the Jews object to; it is equally the Old Testament’s prophecies of the coming Messias, so blazingly and unmistakably fulfilled in Jesus.
Yet it should not be assumed that in shunning the Faith of Moses and David the Jews have abandoned all religious doctrine. Everyone familiar with Jewish practices knows that they still do believe most fervently in a Messias. And they profess this belief constantly — when they force Gentile merchants out of business and take over a city’s shopping district; when they take control of a nation’s newspapers and other means of disseminating ideas; when they demand that laws be passed forbidding anyone to speak against the Jews; when they drive a million Arabs from their homes and appropriate the land for themselves; when they insist that Western nations not only allow this outrage, but support it with their wealth and the blood of their youth — in all these ways and in hundreds of others, the Jews testify to their belief in a Messias.
And if anyone is still wondering who the Jews think the Messias is, Dr. Joseph Klausner, internationally recognized Jewish spokesman, supplies the answer. In his book, The Messianic Idea In Israel (Macmillan, 1955), Dr. Klausner declares that a personal savior has long since been an old-fashioned notion with the Jews and that, “Thus the whole people Israel, in the form of the elect of the nations, gradually became the Messiah of the world, the redeemer of mankind.” [Source: here and here]
P.S. We naive Christians are taught that the evil exemplified by the Jewish political and social culture during the time of Jesus exemplified the evil inherent in mankind generally. I was taught that. And I believed that. But as I see the bigotry, paranoia, supremacism and lacking sense of justice emanating from the Jewish culture today, I wonder now. I wonder whether there may be something about the Jewish culture that is inherently evil. I don't doubt that if Jesus were here today that he would be in conflict the evil emanating from the Jewish culture today, and be considered.... heaven forbid... an "ANTI-SEMITE".
Israeli authorities have given the people of the east Nablus village of Tana 24 hours to evacuate their homes before demolishing them, and threatened to confiscate their livestock when the deadline falls, sources in Nablus said. [Source]
The same thing has been the hallmark of 63 years of Naqba.
"The acts of Jewish terrorism that had marked the final months of the British Mandate (when Jews were blowing up British buildings in Palestine, hanging British soldiers, mailing time-bombs to members of the British cabinet) seemed like mere schoolboy pranks when the Jews went to work on the Arabs.
One million Arabs, both Muslim and Christian, residents of Palestine were forced to flee their ancestral homes ~ the orchards, pastures, and farms their people had worked for centuries. And as Archbishop George Hakim of Galilee insisted: “They were terrorized out.”
The persuasive device employed by the Jews was simple: they massacred one whole Arab village; then they sent a sound-truck through all the neighboring villages, promising each one the same fate unless the people evacuated their homes immediately."
And also this from below from 1955: "A communique from Brother Anthony Bruya, O. F. M., on the plight of the town of Rameh, bears vivid witness to the special hatred which has been shown to Catholics in the Holy Land. Israeli forces occupied Rameh, a two-thirds Christian community, and while permitting the Muslim Arabs to stay, ordered all Catholics to “leave within half an hour.”
To back up the order, the Israeli commander reminded the Christian townspeople of what had happened to the residents of Deir Assin and Tireh ~ who were massacred in the streets for daring to question the authority of a Jewish army leader.
Similar atrocities have taken place in Haifa, Sheframr, Maslia, Tarshiha, and a hundred other places. But perhaps the most touching and tragic report is the one dated January 15, 1952, in which Archbishop George Hakim of Galilee protested in vain to the Israeli government over the mass destruction of the totally Catholic village of Ikret. Church, schools, rectory, homes ~ everything was in shambles. And what is more, wrote the Archbishop, the Jews perpetrated all this on Christmas Day itself." [Source]
The Rejected People of Scripture: Why Jews Fear the Bible
The prime incentive for reading God’s word is always, of course, just that: it is God’s word — the thundering, inspired account of man’s long climb from Genesis to Apocalypse; how he fell from grace, how he was redeemed, what he must do to be saved.
But there is another reason also why now, particularly, we ought to take our Scriptures off the shelves. The notion has got around (at whose prompting, we will let you guess) that the Bible is a book which celebrates the Jews; and that since we Catholics are supposed to reverence the Bible, we ought also to honor the race to whom it is devoted.
The number of people who have been deceived by this artful dodge indicates one thing: how crass and colossal is our present-day ignorance of Holy Scripture.
No one could possibly read the seventy-two books which constitute God’s revelation and conclude that Jews deserve the esteem of Catholics. For albeit the Bible presents Jewish history, it is not the sort of history the Anti-Defamation League would approve. It is the story of how a few faithful Jews in each generation championed God against the rest of their race — a proud, stubborn, ungrateful, and unbelieving multitude. Far from promoting love for the Jews, the Bible is thus the font of Christian anti-Jewishness. No other book gives such a strong, sure taste of their perfidy.
It is in the New Testament that the Jews are shown at their ultimate worst — when they are confronted with the Messias, reject Him, crucify Him, call down His Blood as a curse upon them, and then do their utmost to prevent His gospel from being spread through the world. A partial report on this New-Testament portrayal of the Jews appears below. But even under the Old Law it is evident what the Jews are coming to. Prophet after prophet castigates them for their wickedness and warns them that they are going to be rejected by God in favor of the Gentiles; and prophet after prophet is killed by the Jews in defiant retort. As early as the book of Exodus, God has said to Moses: “See that this people is stiff-necked. Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them: and I will make of thee a great nation.” (Exodus 32:9)
Plainly, it is not for their own sakes, or for any goodness inherent in the race, that the Jews are kept at the center of the Old-Testament stage. It is, rather, because through some Jews — a holy, beleaguered handful, like Moses and Joshua and David and the prophets — the true Faith is kept alive down to the time of Our Lord. And the other reason for God’s sustained interest in the Jews is that eventually from their thorny midst there will blossom His one perfect creature, the Virginal Mother of His Son.
But if the Jews make such a poor showing in the Old Testament, how do they bear to read it? The answer is, they don’t. Their religious reading time is devoted to a post-Crucifixion book of their own devising, the Talmud. The Jews have rejected the first part of Holy Scripture as surely and as violently as they have rejected the second. Nor is it merely the treatment of their ancestors that the Jews object to; it is equally the Old Testament’s prophecies of the coming Messias, so blazingly and unmistakably fulfilled in Jesus.
Yet it should not be assumed that in shunning the Faith of Moses and David the Jews have abandoned all religious doctrine. Everyone familiar with Jewish practices knows that they still do believe most fervently in a Messias. And they profess this belief constantly — when they force Gentile merchants out of business and take over a city’s shopping district; when they take control of a nation’s newspapers and other means of disseminating ideas; when they demand that laws be passed forbidding anyone to speak against the Jews; when they drive a million Arabs from their homes and appropriate the land for themselves; when they insist that Western nations not only allow this outrage, but support it with their wealth and the blood of their youth — in all these ways and in hundreds of others, the Jews testify to their belief in a Messias.
And if anyone is still wondering who the Jews think the Messias is, Dr. Joseph Klausner, internationally recognized Jewish spokesman, supplies the answer. In his book, The Messianic Idea In Israel (Macmillan, 1955), Dr. Klausner declares that a personal savior has long since been an old-fashioned notion with the Jews and that, “Thus the whole people Israel, in the form of the elect of the nations, gradually became the Messiah of the world, the redeemer of mankind.” [Source: here and here]
P.S. We naive Christians are taught that the evil exemplified by the Jewish political and social culture during the time of Jesus exemplified the evil inherent in mankind generally. I was taught that. And I believed that. But as I see the bigotry, paranoia, supremacism and lacking sense of justice emanating from the Jewish culture today, I wonder now. I wonder whether there may be something about the Jewish culture that is inherently evil. I don't doubt that if Jesus were here today that he would be in conflict the evil emanating from the Jewish culture today, and be considered.... heaven forbid... an "ANTI-SEMITE".
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Grandma Got Molested at the Airport
Merry Christmas, Americans. We're getting what we deserve this Christmas.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Here's Why FBI Is Orchestrating Fake Terror Plots
Why does the FBI orchestrate fake “terror plots”? The latest one snared Osman Mohamud, a Somali-American teenager in Portland, Ore. The Associated Press report is headlined: “Somali-born teen plotted car-bombing in Oregon.”
This is a misleading headline as the report makes it clear that it was a plot orchestrated by federal agents. Two sentences into the news report we have this: “The bomb was an elaborate fake supplied by the [FBI] agents and the public was never in danger, authorities said.” The teenager was supplied with a fake bomb and a fake detonator.
Three sentences later the reporters contradict the quoted authorities with a quote from Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon: “The threat was very real.”
The reporters then contradict Balizan: “White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said Saturday that President Barack Obama was aware of the FBI operation before Friday’s arrest. Shapiro said Obama was assured that the FBI was in full control of the operation and that the public was not in danger.”
Then Shapiro contradicts himself by declaring: “The events of the past 24 hours underscore the necessity of remaining vigilant against terrorism here and abroad.” The story arrives at its Kafkaesque high point when Obama thanks the FBI for its diligence in saving us from the fake plot the FBI had fabricated. After vacillating between whether they are reporting a real plot or an orchestrated one, the reporters finally come down on the side of orchestration. Documents released by U.S. Attorney Dwight Holton “show the sting operation began in June.”
Obviously, the targeted Portland teenager was not “hot to trot,” so the FBI had to work on him for six months. The reporters compare “the Portland sting” to the recent arrest in Virginia of Faroque Ahmed, who was ensnared in a “bombing plot that was a ruse conducted over the past six months by federal officials.”
Think about this carefully. The FBI did a year’s work in order to convince two people to participate in fake plots.
If you are not too bright and some tough-looking guys accost you and tell you that they are al Qaeda and expect your help in a terrorist operation, you might be afraid to say no, or you might be thrilled to be part of a blowback against an American population that is indifferent to their government’s slaughter of people of your ethnicity or religion in your country of origin. Whichever way it falls, it is unlikely the ensnared person would ever have done anything beyond talk had the FBI not organized them into action.
In other cases the FBI entices people with money to participate in its fake plots. Since 9-11, the only domestic “terrorist plot” that I recall that was not obviously organized by the FBI is the “Times Square plot” to which Faisal Shahzad pleaded guilty to trying to set off a car bomb in Manhattan. This “plot,” too, is suspicious. One would think that a real terrorist would have a real bomb, not a smoke bomb. In his May 19, 2009 article, Joe Quinn of online site, Sott.net, collects some of the fake plots, some of which were validated by tortured confessions and others by ignorant and fearful juries.
The U.S. government comes up with a plot and an accused, and then tortures him until he confesses, or the government fabricates a case and takes it to jurors who know that they cannot face their neighbors if they let off a media-declared “terrorist.”
Perhaps the most obvious of these cases is “the Miami seven,” a pathetic group of Christian-Zionist-Muslims that called themselves the “Seas of David” and were quietly living in a Florida warehouse awaiting what they regarded as biblical end-times. Along came the FBI posing as al Qaeda and offered them $50,000 and an al Qaeda swearing-in ceremony.
The FBI told them that they needed to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago and various government buildings. An honest Knight Ridder news service reporter revealed: “The Justice [sic] Department unveiled the arrests with an orchestrated series of news conferences in two cities, but the severity of the charges compared with the seemingly amateurish nature of the group raised concerns among civil libertarians,” who noted that the group had “no weapons, no explosives.”
The Justice (sic) Department and tamed media made a big show out of the “militaristic boots” worn by the hapless “plotters,” but the FBI had bought the boots for them.
The biggest piece of evidence against the hapless group was that they had taken photos of “targets” in Florida, but the U.S. government had equipped them with cameras. The U.S. government even rented cars for its dupes to drive to take the pictures.
It turns out that the group only wanted the $50,000, but an American jury convicted them anyhow.
When the U.S. government has to go to such lengths to create “terrorists” out of hapless people, an undeclared agenda is being served. What could this agenda be?
The answer is many agendas. One agenda is to justify wars of aggression that are war crimes under the Nuremberg standard created by the U.S. government itself. One way to avoid war crime charges is to create acts of terrorism that justify the naked aggressions against “terrorist countries.”
Another agenda is to create a police state. A police state can control people who object to their impoverishment for the benefit of the super-rich much more easily than can a democracy endowed with constitutional civil liberties.
Another agenda is to get rich. Terror plots, whether real or orchestrated, have created a market for security. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, former head of U.S. Homeland Security, is the lobbyist who represents Rapiscan, the company that manufactures the full body “porno-scanners” that, following the “underwear bomber” event, are now filling up U.S. airports.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts can be found here.
P.S. Here's hoping that this is becoming obvious to even the densest of dense Americans. For reading challenged Americans, a video exposition of these fake terror plots can be seen here.
This is a misleading headline as the report makes it clear that it was a plot orchestrated by federal agents. Two sentences into the news report we have this: “The bomb was an elaborate fake supplied by the [FBI] agents and the public was never in danger, authorities said.” The teenager was supplied with a fake bomb and a fake detonator.
Three sentences later the reporters contradict the quoted authorities with a quote from Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon: “The threat was very real.”
The reporters then contradict Balizan: “White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said Saturday that President Barack Obama was aware of the FBI operation before Friday’s arrest. Shapiro said Obama was assured that the FBI was in full control of the operation and that the public was not in danger.”
Then Shapiro contradicts himself by declaring: “The events of the past 24 hours underscore the necessity of remaining vigilant against terrorism here and abroad.” The story arrives at its Kafkaesque high point when Obama thanks the FBI for its diligence in saving us from the fake plot the FBI had fabricated. After vacillating between whether they are reporting a real plot or an orchestrated one, the reporters finally come down on the side of orchestration. Documents released by U.S. Attorney Dwight Holton “show the sting operation began in June.”
Obviously, the targeted Portland teenager was not “hot to trot,” so the FBI had to work on him for six months. The reporters compare “the Portland sting” to the recent arrest in Virginia of Faroque Ahmed, who was ensnared in a “bombing plot that was a ruse conducted over the past six months by federal officials.”
Think about this carefully. The FBI did a year’s work in order to convince two people to participate in fake plots.
If you are not too bright and some tough-looking guys accost you and tell you that they are al Qaeda and expect your help in a terrorist operation, you might be afraid to say no, or you might be thrilled to be part of a blowback against an American population that is indifferent to their government’s slaughter of people of your ethnicity or religion in your country of origin. Whichever way it falls, it is unlikely the ensnared person would ever have done anything beyond talk had the FBI not organized them into action.
In other cases the FBI entices people with money to participate in its fake plots. Since 9-11, the only domestic “terrorist plot” that I recall that was not obviously organized by the FBI is the “Times Square plot” to which Faisal Shahzad pleaded guilty to trying to set off a car bomb in Manhattan. This “plot,” too, is suspicious. One would think that a real terrorist would have a real bomb, not a smoke bomb. In his May 19, 2009 article, Joe Quinn of online site, Sott.net, collects some of the fake plots, some of which were validated by tortured confessions and others by ignorant and fearful juries.
The U.S. government comes up with a plot and an accused, and then tortures him until he confesses, or the government fabricates a case and takes it to jurors who know that they cannot face their neighbors if they let off a media-declared “terrorist.”
Perhaps the most obvious of these cases is “the Miami seven,” a pathetic group of Christian-Zionist-Muslims that called themselves the “Seas of David” and were quietly living in a Florida warehouse awaiting what they regarded as biblical end-times. Along came the FBI posing as al Qaeda and offered them $50,000 and an al Qaeda swearing-in ceremony.
The FBI told them that they needed to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago and various government buildings. An honest Knight Ridder news service reporter revealed: “The Justice [sic] Department unveiled the arrests with an orchestrated series of news conferences in two cities, but the severity of the charges compared with the seemingly amateurish nature of the group raised concerns among civil libertarians,” who noted that the group had “no weapons, no explosives.”
The Justice (sic) Department and tamed media made a big show out of the “militaristic boots” worn by the hapless “plotters,” but the FBI had bought the boots for them.
The biggest piece of evidence against the hapless group was that they had taken photos of “targets” in Florida, but the U.S. government had equipped them with cameras. The U.S. government even rented cars for its dupes to drive to take the pictures.
It turns out that the group only wanted the $50,000, but an American jury convicted them anyhow.
When the U.S. government has to go to such lengths to create “terrorists” out of hapless people, an undeclared agenda is being served. What could this agenda be?
The answer is many agendas. One agenda is to justify wars of aggression that are war crimes under the Nuremberg standard created by the U.S. government itself. One way to avoid war crime charges is to create acts of terrorism that justify the naked aggressions against “terrorist countries.”
Another agenda is to create a police state. A police state can control people who object to their impoverishment for the benefit of the super-rich much more easily than can a democracy endowed with constitutional civil liberties.
Another agenda is to get rich. Terror plots, whether real or orchestrated, have created a market for security. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, former head of U.S. Homeland Security, is the lobbyist who represents Rapiscan, the company that manufactures the full body “porno-scanners” that, following the “underwear bomber” event, are now filling up U.S. airports.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts can be found here.
P.S. Here's hoping that this is becoming obvious to even the densest of dense Americans. For reading challenged Americans, a video exposition of these fake terror plots can be seen here.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Brother Nathanael: Seats of Jewish Power
Could I have entered this posting as "anti-Semitic" musing? Yes, of course. It is "anti-Semitic" to be cognizant of the extent of jewish power and influence in our American affairs, mentioning it is definitely "anti-Semitic".
Oh, and to my "anti-Semitic" musing that virtually all jews are zionists, how many of "our" jewish members of congress are not also zionists? How many aren't?
And of course you know that it would be "anti-Semitic" to think about resting any power from our jewish leadership even though it is proving to be the ruination of America. So to our ruination we must go. Blame it on anything and everything else except the overwhelming jewish power and influence in the affairs of America. Otherwise would be "anti-Semitic".
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Anti-Semitic Musing 005: Virtually All Jews Are Zionists
“It's not all jews.” That's the inevitable refrain that will be heard from jewish sycophants in discussions of the latest zionist crimes against humanity that are so horrific that they get peoples' attention despite the best efforts of our jewish mainstream media. What jewish sycophants mean when they utter this well worn refrain is that the majority of jews are not zionists. But this is a conditioned notion not based on empirical evidence.
Those that utter this refrain just assume that it's true without the least thought that it may not be. In fact it isn't true. In fact the very opposite is true. Most jews are zionists, i.e., they believe in the need for and support the concept of a jewish [apartheid] state. All jewish sycophants [i.e. naïve Americans] would have to do to prove or disprove this notion is to begin asking jews within their orbits of existence what they think about jews having a jewish state. If they would do this, I can almost guarantee that they'd find out that virtually all the jews that they talk to are in indeed zionists.
And if they happen to have any jewish friends, who they assume aren't zioinists, they can include them in the mix. Yes, even the peace activists ones. They must believe zionism can be had nicely. Heck, even well known jewish altruists like Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstien and Jennifer Lowenstein [local to Wisconsinites], who are commonly held up as jewish “anti-zionist” saints, are in fact zionists.
It is safer to assume that a jew is a zionist until proven otherwise.
I highly encourage people to get to know jews in order to dispel this conditioned notion that most jews aren't zionists. Because when jewish sycophants say 'it's not all jews', they're denying that virtually all jews, through virtually every jewish organization lend to the zionist agenda, and are in fact serving to cover for a very real jewish tyranny we as Americans are all living under.
And when jewish sycophants like “truth jihadist” Kevin Barret constantly grovels on his radio show that he's not “anti-Semitic” or an “anti-Semite,” and he asserts that people like John Kaminski are, meaning they're bigots, for telling the real truth of things, they are themselves supporting real bigotry, i.e., zionism: jewish supremacsim, jewish exceptionalism, jewish apartheid.
Kaminski is not alone in telling the ugly turth of things regarding jews, many decent, famous people, Martin Luther among them, have had first hand experiences with them and tried to tell the general population of the ugly nature of jewry, only to be tagged with the bigoted label of anti-Semiticsm that Barret and other naïve jewish sycophants unwittingly lend their support to by so flippantly throwing it about as they do.
I know it's not such an easy matter for Americans to find jews to befriend and talk to in order to find out for themselves that the overwhelming majority of jews are in fact zionists, because despite their inordinate power and influence in the affairs of our country, they are few and far between in number, and because they are generally a cryptic and isolationist group of people. This, and the fact that they control our mainstream media, is also the reason this notion that the majority of jews aren't zionists is so easily maintained.
Because it is not such an easy matter for most Americans to find jews to talk to and befriend, I encourage them to go visit the online bartcop.com forum, which is a site that is moderated by and mostly populated by mainstream, liberal, American jews. There gentile Americans can go and talk to mainstream jews about Israel, zionism, what's happening to the Palestinians, etc. But be forewarned before you go. They don't like to talk about these things. You'll have to bring those matters up yourself. And they won't be warmly received.
Bartcop is where I discovered the truth that virtually all jews are indeed zionists. That's where I learned to think of myself as a gentile. I never did that until the jews there made me cognizant of it. And that's also where I became disgusted with the sense of justice of mainstream jews, or more accurately stated, their lacking sense of justice.
After you've visited the people at bartcop a while, and hopefully raised the matters I've mentioned above, you can tell them RickB sent you. But don't tell them that up front. You may get kicked out before you have a chance to talk to them much.
P.S. Following are additional musings on this topic:
1) Do the overwhelming majority of jewish organizations in this country support zionism? Yes, most likcly.
Are they for the most part inculcating their followers with paranoia and supremacism, while naïve gentiles are taught that there's no difference between us, that it doesn't matter whether a person is jewish or ont? Yes, most likely!
2) Are any of our “mainstream” jewish congress people anti-zionists? No, not likely?
3) Apart from the crazy, marginalized Naturei Karta guys, who are Talmudists (and we know what that means: gentiles are speaking cattle), do you detect any zionist/anti-zionist schism in the jewish community? I don’t either.
4) Of all the jews that appear in our living rooms daily through our televisions, in virtually every scenario (news, sports, sitcoms, cooking shows) how many are anti-zionists? If there were a significant amount of “mainstream” jews that are anti-zionists, I think we’d see here some of that sentimentality slip out.
5) Are any of our mainstream jewish media pundits [Olberman, Maddow, etc.] anti-zionists? No, they aren’t?
6) All mainstream jewish corporate bosses, support the “war on terror,” i.e, the zionist agenda. A reflection of this can be seen in the fact that .all of our major sports leagues, which are controlled by jews, are enthusiastically supporting the war on terror.
7) And sports fans, jews also dominate the sports media industry. It seems as a general rule that all the white sports journalists are jewish [Bob Costas, Al Michaels, Chris Berman, Mike Greenberg (of the popular Mike & Mike morning sports show)], unless they're a former coach for player. So when you're watching any game of any sport, the geeky white guy that's not a former athlete is very likely to be jewish. Why should the sport industry be different from any other segment of our lives?
Note: In your personal investigation of whether most jews are zoinist or not, keep in mind that many zionist jews don’t think of themselves as zionists because they think zionists are only the most rabid and embarrassing bigoted of the zionists. They have no idea that believing in the need for and right to have a jewish state (and think that they can have jewish apartheid nicely makes them zionists. So you can’t just take their word for whether they’re zionists or not. Ask them if they believe jews should have and have the right to have a jewish state.
Those that utter this refrain just assume that it's true without the least thought that it may not be. In fact it isn't true. In fact the very opposite is true. Most jews are zionists, i.e., they believe in the need for and support the concept of a jewish [apartheid] state. All jewish sycophants [i.e. naïve Americans] would have to do to prove or disprove this notion is to begin asking jews within their orbits of existence what they think about jews having a jewish state. If they would do this, I can almost guarantee that they'd find out that virtually all the jews that they talk to are in indeed zionists.
And if they happen to have any jewish friends, who they assume aren't zioinists, they can include them in the mix. Yes, even the peace activists ones. They must believe zionism can be had nicely. Heck, even well known jewish altruists like Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstien and Jennifer Lowenstein [local to Wisconsinites], who are commonly held up as jewish “anti-zionist” saints, are in fact zionists.
It is safer to assume that a jew is a zionist until proven otherwise.
I highly encourage people to get to know jews in order to dispel this conditioned notion that most jews aren't zionists. Because when jewish sycophants say 'it's not all jews', they're denying that virtually all jews, through virtually every jewish organization lend to the zionist agenda, and are in fact serving to cover for a very real jewish tyranny we as Americans are all living under.
And when jewish sycophants like “truth jihadist” Kevin Barret constantly grovels on his radio show that he's not “anti-Semitic” or an “anti-Semite,” and he asserts that people like John Kaminski are, meaning they're bigots, for telling the real truth of things, they are themselves supporting real bigotry, i.e., zionism: jewish supremacsim, jewish exceptionalism, jewish apartheid.
Kaminski is not alone in telling the ugly turth of things regarding jews, many decent, famous people, Martin Luther among them, have had first hand experiences with them and tried to tell the general population of the ugly nature of jewry, only to be tagged with the bigoted label of anti-Semiticsm that Barret and other naïve jewish sycophants unwittingly lend their support to by so flippantly throwing it about as they do.
I know it's not such an easy matter for Americans to find jews to befriend and talk to in order to find out for themselves that the overwhelming majority of jews are in fact zionists, because despite their inordinate power and influence in the affairs of our country, they are few and far between in number, and because they are generally a cryptic and isolationist group of people. This, and the fact that they control our mainstream media, is also the reason this notion that the majority of jews aren't zionists is so easily maintained.
Because it is not such an easy matter for most Americans to find jews to talk to and befriend, I encourage them to go visit the online bartcop.com forum, which is a site that is moderated by and mostly populated by mainstream, liberal, American jews. There gentile Americans can go and talk to mainstream jews about Israel, zionism, what's happening to the Palestinians, etc. But be forewarned before you go. They don't like to talk about these things. You'll have to bring those matters up yourself. And they won't be warmly received.
Bartcop is where I discovered the truth that virtually all jews are indeed zionists. That's where I learned to think of myself as a gentile. I never did that until the jews there made me cognizant of it. And that's also where I became disgusted with the sense of justice of mainstream jews, or more accurately stated, their lacking sense of justice.
After you've visited the people at bartcop a while, and hopefully raised the matters I've mentioned above, you can tell them RickB sent you. But don't tell them that up front. You may get kicked out before you have a chance to talk to them much.
P.S. Following are additional musings on this topic:
1) Do the overwhelming majority of jewish organizations in this country support zionism? Yes, most likcly.
Are they for the most part inculcating their followers with paranoia and supremacism, while naïve gentiles are taught that there's no difference between us, that it doesn't matter whether a person is jewish or ont? Yes, most likely!
2) Are any of our “mainstream” jewish congress people anti-zionists? No, not likely?
3) Apart from the crazy, marginalized Naturei Karta guys, who are Talmudists (and we know what that means: gentiles are speaking cattle), do you detect any zionist/anti-zionist schism in the jewish community? I don’t either.
4) Of all the jews that appear in our living rooms daily through our televisions, in virtually every scenario (news, sports, sitcoms, cooking shows) how many are anti-zionists? If there were a significant amount of “mainstream” jews that are anti-zionists, I think we’d see here some of that sentimentality slip out.
5) Are any of our mainstream jewish media pundits [Olberman, Maddow, etc.] anti-zionists? No, they aren’t?
6) All mainstream jewish corporate bosses, support the “war on terror,” i.e, the zionist agenda. A reflection of this can be seen in the fact that .all of our major sports leagues, which are controlled by jews, are enthusiastically supporting the war on terror.
7) And sports fans, jews also dominate the sports media industry. It seems as a general rule that all the white sports journalists are jewish [Bob Costas, Al Michaels, Chris Berman, Mike Greenberg (of the popular Mike & Mike morning sports show)], unless they're a former coach for player. So when you're watching any game of any sport, the geeky white guy that's not a former athlete is very likely to be jewish. Why should the sport industry be different from any other segment of our lives?
Note: In your personal investigation of whether most jews are zoinist or not, keep in mind that many zionist jews don’t think of themselves as zionists because they think zionists are only the most rabid and embarrassing bigoted of the zionists. They have no idea that believing in the need for and right to have a jewish state (and think that they can have jewish apartheid nicely makes them zionists. So you can’t just take their word for whether they’re zionists or not. Ask them if they believe jews should have and have the right to have a jewish state.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Anti-Semitic Musing 004: Telling the Truth is "Anti-Semitic"
In response to former White House correspondent Helen Thomas’s latest anti-Jewish comments, the Anti-Defamation League is calling on all journalism schools and professional organizations to rescind the honors they have granted her.
On Thursday in Dearborn, Mich., Thomas defended the comments that resulted in her abrupt resignation from Hearst Newspapers (telling the Jews to get out of Israel) and went on to assert that Zionists controlled America’s foreign policy and institutions.
“Congress, the White House and Hollywood, Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion,” Thomas said. “They put their money where their mouth is. We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way.”
Abraham Foxman, ADL national director, expressed his displeasure and called on those who have honored Thomas to revoke their support in a statement released Friday
“Helen Thomas has clearly, unequivocally revealed herself as a vulgar anti-Semite,” Foxman said. “Her suggestion that Zionists control government, finance and Hollywood is nothing less than classic, garden-variety anti-Semitism. This is a sad final chapter to an otherwise illustrious career. Unlike her previous, spontaneous remarks into a camera, these words were carefully thought out and conscious. It shows a prejudice that is deep-seated and obsessive.
Thomas has received more than 30 honorary degrees and has had several awards named in her honor, including the Society of Professional Journalists’ Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement.
Source article can be found here.
P.S. Telling the truth is "anti-Semitic". That is why we can't have the truth about 9/11 and the real reason for the "war on terror"... and why goyim can not ever, ever, never, never question the Holycaust. For naive gentiles that don't believe me, I suggest that you find out the truth of these matters and try to speak up about them. You'll seen discover that you have become an "anti-Semite".
Dayim, not only is Helen Thomas considered an "anti-Semite", she's a "vulgar anti-Semite". As the truth of things is becoming known, a new "anti-Semite" is being born every day. Merry Christmas!
On Thursday in Dearborn, Mich., Thomas defended the comments that resulted in her abrupt resignation from Hearst Newspapers (telling the Jews to get out of Israel) and went on to assert that Zionists controlled America’s foreign policy and institutions.
“Congress, the White House and Hollywood, Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion,” Thomas said. “They put their money where their mouth is. We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way.”
Abraham Foxman, ADL national director, expressed his displeasure and called on those who have honored Thomas to revoke their support in a statement released Friday
“Helen Thomas has clearly, unequivocally revealed herself as a vulgar anti-Semite,” Foxman said. “Her suggestion that Zionists control government, finance and Hollywood is nothing less than classic, garden-variety anti-Semitism. This is a sad final chapter to an otherwise illustrious career. Unlike her previous, spontaneous remarks into a camera, these words were carefully thought out and conscious. It shows a prejudice that is deep-seated and obsessive.
Thomas has received more than 30 honorary degrees and has had several awards named in her honor, including the Society of Professional Journalists’ Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime Achievement.
Source article can be found here.
P.S. Telling the truth is "anti-Semitic". That is why we can't have the truth about 9/11 and the real reason for the "war on terror"... and why goyim can not ever, ever, never, never question the Holycaust. For naive gentiles that don't believe me, I suggest that you find out the truth of these matters and try to speak up about them. You'll seen discover that you have become an "anti-Semite".
Dayim, not only is Helen Thomas considered an "anti-Semite", she's a "vulgar anti-Semite". As the truth of things is becoming known, a new "anti-Semite" is being born every day. Merry Christmas!
Friday, December 3, 2010
Anti-Semitic Musing 003: Zionists Control US Foreign Policy
Thomas, a former White House journalist, said Israel can never be criticized in the US because Zionists are in control of the American foreign policy as well as its main institutions.
"I can call a president of the US anything in the book, but I can't touch Israel, which has Jewish-only roads in the West Bank," Thomas said.
The 90-year-old national columnist says the White House, Congress, Wall Street and Hollywood are all owned by the Zionists.
"Congress, the White House, Hollywood, and Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion," she said.
Thomas also said that she stands by the comments she made about Israel earlier this year, which was condemned by the local Jewish community.
Thomas had said that Israelis should get out of Palestine and return to their homes in Europe and the US.
In an interview, Thomas said that criticizing Israel was the reason she was forced to resign from Hearst Newspapers and was ostracized in Washington.
The longtime White House correspondent, who grew up in Detroit as the daughter of Lebanese immigrants, was in Dearborn for a workshop on anti-Arab bias.
Jewish groups have called Thomas' earlier remarks unfair and bigoted. They have also slammed Thursday's remarks.
Source
P.S. Oh Helen, you can't say these things in the USA. Demonstrative of jewish control in America is the fact that virtually all Americans have no clue what zionism is [jewish supremacism, jewish exceptionalism, jewish apartheid from goyim] yet they're the jewish golum/gorilla responsible for shoving zionism down the world's throat. And if Americans should think about discussing who really runs things in America [jews] and venture to say the word "jew", they'll first look about, then say it in a whisper.
"I can call a president of the US anything in the book, but I can't touch Israel, which has Jewish-only roads in the West Bank," Thomas said.
The 90-year-old national columnist says the White House, Congress, Wall Street and Hollywood are all owned by the Zionists.
"Congress, the White House, Hollywood, and Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion," she said.
Thomas also said that she stands by the comments she made about Israel earlier this year, which was condemned by the local Jewish community.
Thomas had said that Israelis should get out of Palestine and return to their homes in Europe and the US.
In an interview, Thomas said that criticizing Israel was the reason she was forced to resign from Hearst Newspapers and was ostracized in Washington.
The longtime White House correspondent, who grew up in Detroit as the daughter of Lebanese immigrants, was in Dearborn for a workshop on anti-Arab bias.
Jewish groups have called Thomas' earlier remarks unfair and bigoted. They have also slammed Thursday's remarks.
Source
P.S. Oh Helen, you can't say these things in the USA. Demonstrative of jewish control in America is the fact that virtually all Americans have no clue what zionism is [jewish supremacism, jewish exceptionalism, jewish apartheid from goyim] yet they're the jewish golum/gorilla responsible for shoving zionism down the world's throat. And if Americans should think about discussing who really runs things in America [jews] and venture to say the word "jew", they'll first look about, then say it in a whisper.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
