Wednesday, October 22, 2014
One striking aspect of this new concern of the US President for the situation in Liberia and other west African states where alleged surges of Ebola are being claimed is the presence of oil, huge volumes of untapped oil.
The offshore coast of Liberia and east African ‘Ebola zones’ conveniently map with the presence of vast untapped oil and gas resources shown here
The issue of oil in west Africa, notably in the waters of the Gulf of Guinea have become increasingly strategic both to China who is roaming the world in search of future secure oil import sources, and the United States, whose oil geo-politics was summed up in a quip by then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the 1970’s: ‘If you control the oil, you control entire nations.’
The Obama Administration and Pentagon policy has continued that of George W. Bush who in 2008 created the US military Africa Command or AFRICOM, to battle the rapidly-growing Chinese economic presence in Africa’s potential oil-rich countries. West Africa is a rapidly-emerging oil treasure, barely tapped to date. A US Department of Energy study projected that African oil production would rise 91 percent between 2002 and 2025, much from the region of the present Ebola alarm.
Chinese oil companies are all over Africa and increasingly active in west Africa, especially Angola, Sudan and Guinea, the later in the epicenter of Obama’s new War on Ebola troop deployment.
If the US President were genuine about his concern to contain a public health emergency, he could look at the example of that US-declared pariah Caribbean nation, Cuba. Reuters reports that the Cuban government, a small financially distressed, economically sanctioned island nation of 11 million people, with a national budget of $50 billion, Gross Domestic Product of 121 billion and per capita GDP of just over $10,000, is dispatching 165 medical personnel to Africa to regions where there are Ebola outbreaks. Washington sends 3,000 combat troops. Something smells very rotten around the entire Ebola scare.
Read the rest of the article here.
Friday, October 10, 2014
Blog editor's note: When the Israelis commenced their most recent inglorious rampage through Gaza, I told a Palestinian friend that Netanyahu would be Israel's last prime minister. It was only an instinctive sensation. Seems by Gilad Atzmon's latest article, below, that he might agree.
Atzmon's "Israel, Here Comes The End"
An Israeli Facebook page launched earlier this month to assist Israelis in escaping their apocalypse through migration has now gone viral reaching more than 700,000 Israelis. It is called Olim Le-Berlin, ‘Ascending to Berlin,’ using the same positive Hebrew expression ‘Aliya’ attributed to the Jewish Diaspora emigrating to Israel.
Apparently, the confident Zio-patriotic balloon has been burst by a few Palestinian rockets landing in Tel Aviv. In truth, this implosion is occurring because the Jewish State is an inconvincible concept. As much as the Jews yearned to return to their phantasmic ‘homeland,’ they failed to make Palestine into a true home. On the contrary, Israel has become the definitive showcase of every problematic Jewish ideological and cultural trait: it is racially supremacist, it is exclusive, it is an abusive ghetto suffocated with goy hatred, and its treatment of its own people and especially its poor is despicable.
Yesterday, I learned from Israeli TV Arutz 2 that the migration campaign organizers have applied directly to German Kunstler Angela Merkel to request 25,000 temporary work visas. They did so in response to more than 9000 calls from desperate Israelis. Some Israeli patriots are clearly devastated by the recent dash to mass migration, they labeled the new campaign as an “insult to all Holocaust survivors.” “See you in the gas chambers,” commented one critic on the Facebook page. If any of these WMD obsessed Israelis really want to witness the way in which my exile Israeli friends interact artistically with me, jazz chambers rather than ‘gas chambers’ is probably the best place to do so.
According to Israeli officials, the number of Israeli ‘deserters’ is offset by incoming Jews from Eastern Europe, America and France, who tend to be “more religious and right-wing.” Israeli officials also admit that Western metropolitans are more attractive to Israeli secular and educated youngsters. A growing numbers of educated Israelis understand that Israel’s fate is pretty much sealed. It is crucial to remember that for more than a few years, Israelis of European descent have been queuing at German, Hungarian and Polish consulates for foreign passports. Their Sephardi brothers are also eagerly awaiting for the Spanish parliament to approve a plan to grant nationality to no less than three million Sephardi Jews.
The take home message is devastatingly clear. Israel has now officially entered its final terminal phase. The catastrophic situation has entered into Israeli collective awareness. Israelis are now running for their lives and they have good reason to believe that Europe will soon close its gates to avoid the Hebrew tsunami.
Predictably, it wasn’t the watery Soros funded ‘non-violent’ BDS movement that brought the Jewish State to its end. It was effectuated by authentic Palestinian resistance; an Islamic motivated willingness to fight and a fierce determination to win. It is the ability to send a ballistic message to Tel Aviv and Haifa that delivers the unmistakable message to Israelis that they are dwelling on stolen land.
Again, we see that it doesn’t take much for the Jews to reveal their flimsy ideological and spiritual bond to nationhood. If the IDF and Zionism initially inspired the fearless Jewish combative warrior; a few sirens in Tel Aviv revealed the feeble nature of Israel’s ideological bond and the depth of Israeli hedonistic inclinations. From a psychoanalytical perspective, it may be that the murderous barbarism Israel exhibited in every recent round of violence is the result of a desperate attempt to conceal the weakness and the crumbliness of Jewish nationalism.
Atzmon's article can be found here.
P.S. I'm sure that one good reason jews are fleeing Israel is that they realize the truth better than anybody else that reasoning with jews is impossible.
South Africa's largest trade union federation, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), has joined with health sector unions to demand the expulsion of the Israeli Medical Association (IMA) from the World Medical Association (WMA).
COSATU, along with NEHAWU (National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union), DENOSA (Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa), as well as the SA Medical Association (SAMA), issued the joint call earlier this week. Organisers will protest outside the WMA today, Friday 10 October, supported by campaign groups like BDS South Africa.
In issuing the call for expulsion, COSATU claimed that the IMA "has never denounced or seriously confronted the Israeli government on its shameless use of torture", and has "shown blatant disregard for the ethical issue of medical neutrality."
The South African trade unions also accused the IMA of having "stood silently in the face of...the killing, harassment and wounding of Palestinian health professionals on duty; and the destruction of the Palestinian health systems." They note that "direct appeals to the IMA [over many years] have been unavailing."
COSATU was one of the first trade unions in the world to endorse the Palestinian-led, international boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign. Citing the struggle against South African apartheid, COSTAU is urging the expulsion of the IMA from the WMA, until the Israeli body "unequivocally condemns, distances and actively counter's Israel's torture, occupation and apartheid policies."
Source for this article is here.
P.S. The South African trade unions deserve loud kudos... like the Nobel peace prize... from the larger gentile community for this action. A humble attaboy goes to them from this lil blogger. Thank you for humanity sake.
Thursday, October 9, 2014
The Third Iraq War has begun. With it, longstanding neocon dreams to partition Iraq into three along ethnic and religious lines have been resurrected.
White House officials now estimate that the fight against the region’s ‘Islamic State’ will last years, and may outlive the Obama administration. But this ‘long war’ vision goes back to nebulous ideas formally presented by late RAND Corp analyst Laurent Muraweic before the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board at the invitation of then chairman Richard Perle. That presentation described Iraq as a “tactical pivot” by which to transform the wider Middle East.
Brian Whitaker, former Guardian Middle East editor, rightly noted that the Perle-RAND strategy drew inspiration from a 1996 paper published by the Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, co-authored by Perle and other neocons who held top positions in the post-9/11 Bush administration.
The policy paper advocated a strategy that bears startling resemblance to the chaos unfolding in the wake of the expansion of the ‘Islamic State’ – Israel would “shape its strategic environment” by first securing the removal of Saddam Hussein. “Jordan and Turkey would form an axis along with Israel to weaken and ‘roll back’ Syria.” This axis would attempt to weaken the influence of Lebanon, Syria and Iran by “weaning” off their Shi’ite populations. To succeed, Israel would need to engender US support, which would be obtained by Benjamin Netanyahu formulating the strategy “in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into themes of American administrations during the cold war.”
The 2002 Perle-RAND plan was active in the Bush administration’s strategic thinking on Iraq shortly before the 2003 war. According to US private intelligence firm Stratfor, in late 2002, then vice-president Dick Cheney and deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz had co-authored a scheme under which central Sunni-majority Iraq would join with Jordan; the northern Kurdish regions would become an autonomous state; all becoming separate from the southern Shi’ite region.
The strategic advantages of an Iraq partition, Stratfor argued, focused on US control of oil:
“After eliminating Iraq as a sovereign state, there would be no fear that one day an anti-American government would come to power in Baghdad, as the capital would be in Amman [Jordan]. Current and potential US geopolitical foes Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria would be isolated from each other, with big chunks of land between them under control of the pro-US forces.
“Equally important, Washington would be able to justify its long-term and heavy military presence in the region as necessary for the defense of a young new state asking for US protection – and to secure the stability of oil markets and supplies. That in turn would help the United States gain direct control of Iraqi oil and replace Saudi oil in case of conflict with Riyadh.”
The expansion of the ‘Islamic State’ has provided a pretext for the fundamental contours of this scenario to unfold, with the US and British looking to re-establish a long-term military presence in Iraq.
In 2006, Cheney’s successor, Joe Biden, also indicated his support for the ‘soft partition’ of Iraq along ethno-religious lines – a position which the co-author of the Biden-Iraq plan, Leslie Gelb of the Council on Foreign Relations, now argues is “the only solution” to the current crisis.
In 2008, the strategy re-surfaced – once again via RAND Corp – through a report funded by the US Army Training and Doctrine Command on how to prosecute the ‘long war.’ Among its strategies, one scenario advocated by the report was ‘Divide and Rule’ which would involve “exploiting fault lines between the various Salafi-jihadist groups to turn them against each other and dissipate their energy on internal conflicts.”
Simultaneously, the report suggested that the US could foster conflict between Salafi-jihadists and Shi’ite militants by “shoring up the traditional Sunni regimes… as a way of containing Iranian power and influence in the Middle East and Persian Gulf.”
One way or another, the plan is in motion. Last week, Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Leiberman told US secretary of state John Kerry: “Iraq is breaking up before our eyes and it would appear that the creation of an independent Kurdish state is a foregone conclusion.”
P.S. Read the rest of the article, which provides a detailed explanation, authored by Nafeez Ahmed here. The jews who control us... Americans... got us into Iraq by lies and trickery; they keep us there the same way. Who is your favorite beheading actor? Will you get a vaccine for Ebola?
Sunday, October 5, 2014
Another Questionable ISIS Beheading Video Released
Strategically timed theatrical productions continue
Questionable beheading videos, unverified and unsubstantiated yet accepted as valid by governments and the establishment media, now appear with every political turn in the ISIS War.
The latest person allegedly killed is Alan Henning, a British citizen. His supposed beheading, not actually shown in the video, follows that of another British citizen, David Haines.
On Thursday, the British government announced it would resume training “rebels” fighting against the government of Bashar al-Assad, a move that aids a primary objective ISIS, a terror group supposedly spawned from al-Qaeda in Iraq.
Last week Britain joined the bombing campign in Syria that has killed numerous civilians.
British PM David Cameron explooited the alleged beheading video of Haines, said to be an aid worker, to rally Parliament to war.
“This is about psychopathic terrorists that are trying to kill us and we do have to realize that, whether we like it or not, they have already declared war on us,”Cameron said. “There isn’t a ‘walk on by’ option. There isn’t an option of just hoping this will go away.”
The first in the series of ISIS theatrical productions, the assumed beheading of American James Foley, was dismissed as a fake by vafrious researchers. In August, The Telegraph reported
…a study of the four-minute 40-second clip, carried out by an international forensic science company which has worked for police forces across Britain, suggested camera trickery and slick post-production techniques appear to have been used…no blood can be seen, even though the knife is drawn across the neck area at least six times.
Theatrical beheadings, conducted off camera for unmentioned reason, will continue to be strategically released as the ISIS war unfolds.
The above story was reported by Kurt Nimmo here.
P.S. Doncha just love these beheading videos? Which video was the best... so far? Who's been the best actor? Perhaps some supporting actor in the mainstream jewish media reporting them should get the nod. They've all been doing a knockout job since 9/11/2001. Doncha think? Or, doncha think?