Now a resident of London, Gilad Atzmon is a world-renowned saxophonist and the author of two novels, which have been translated into 22 languages. He left Israel in 1994 after service in the Israeli military convinced him Israel had become a racist, militarised state that was a danger to world peace.
"I was born in a place that happens to be very strategically crucial to quite a few empires, and I was indoctrinated to take part in these idiotic wars and I managed to escape eventually. When I was there I started to see the scale of the atrocities that are committed on my behalf by the Israelis in the name of the Israeli state, with the support of the Jewish people around the world.
"Now and then you hear about one Jew here and one Jew there who is against it, but institutionally this war is supported by world Jewry inside-out."
While he believes people run a risk speaking out against Israel, Gilad Atzmon says he has no choice.
"I think we are under severe danger. We are fighting against the most powerful people on this planet. Seemingly the national state has proved in the last couple of weeks that murdering is not any concern to them, so we have good reason to be afraid or be aware, but I want to tell you something - this planet is at the moment in a devastated state. I have two kids who I love a lot and this is their planet. I'll be here another 20 years, 30 years, maybe tomorrow I'm gone. But they are going to stay here.
"I think Jewish ideology is driving our planet into a catastrophe and we must stop."
"The difference between me and 99 percent of Jews on this planet is that I do not believe they have the right to a state."
"Considering the crimes they committed since the state was born, along with the murderous extravaganza of the past weeks, not only do they not have the right to a state, the state should be dismantled immediately before they turn our planet into a fireball."
"In Israel, 80 to 93 percent of people support this genocide of the Palestinian people, and by the way, the Israeli state is a theological state so it is in the name of the Jewish people - we are dealing here with a major criminal, political identity."
"What they are doing brings so much rage in so many people, including myself. I never felt any anger or rage towards anyone except my people. So I think if I feel it, an Arab or Muslim or person who was ethnically cleansed, or someone whose neighbours or kids have been wiped out? They are not going to forgive.
"They are really dragging us into a level of violence that this world has never seen. It's the quality, the essence of what they're doing. It is the strongest army in the world against innocent civilians."
"Many people ask me about peace and I say you cannot have peace with people who do not internalise the concept of 'love thy neighbour'. This is almost a paradox, because if they love their neighbour, they cease to be who they are [Jewish supremacists for Jewish apartheid].
The word Judeo-Christian is an artificial construct, he says "It's a joke. A joke. It's obviously a political campaign to try to unite the power of America to fight the Jewish enemies, because if the Americans are convinced that there is Judeo-Christian, so then the enemies are the Muslims."
source article
P.S. Gilad Atzmon confirms what I've said before. It's not ALL Jews. It's 99.99 percent of those that identify themselves as Jewish.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Friday, January 30, 2009
Bishop Williamsom: Gas Chambers, Anti-Semitism, Truth
Sorry Bishop, the anti-semitism card trumps truth. You go to jail. It doesn't matter what any gas chamber report says.
Holocaust a 'big lie': Iran government spokesman
Iran's government spokesman on Tuesday branded the Holocaust a "big lie" created to place the Islamic republic's arch-foe Israel in the Middle East, the state IRNA news agency reported.
"The Holocaust is a concept coming from a big lie in order to settle a rootless regime in the heart of the Islamic world," Gholam Hossein Elham told a conference on Gaza in central Iran's religious city of Qom.
Bibi: Iran threat trumps economic crisis
Keeping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons ranks above the economy in the challenges facing leaders in the 21st century, Likud head Binyamin Netanyahu told the World Economic Forum on Thursday.
Netanyahu said the global financial meltdown was reversible but the acquisition of nuclear weapons by a "fanatic radical regime" was not. "We have never had, since the dawn of the nuclear age, nuclear weapons in the hands of such a fanatical regime," he added.
Bibi: al Qaeda will destroy holiest Christian site
Benjamin Netanyahu, the favorite to win the upcoming Israeli election, says al Qaeda terrorists will destroy Jesus Christ's burial site.
Netanyahu, who claims he had predicted an Islamic extremists attack on the World Trade Center six years before the actual attack, said terrorists will target Church of the Holy Sepulchre also known as the Church of the Resurrection - Christianity's holiest site.
"Radical Islam is willing and will want to attack the symbolic heart of the Christian religion," said the former Israeli prime minister.
"This will incur a chain reaction we can't even envision. We will witness an escalation of religious conflict above and beyond the regional conflict we have now," Daily Telegraph quoted him as saying.
The Right-wing Likud leader said he had warned in a 1995 book -- six years before the September 11 attacks -- that "Islamist terrorists" would detonate a nuclear device in the World Trade Centre in New York.
P.S. Bibi, let me guess, will those Islamic terrorists be from Iran?
"The Holocaust is a concept coming from a big lie in order to settle a rootless regime in the heart of the Islamic world," Gholam Hossein Elham told a conference on Gaza in central Iran's religious city of Qom.
Bibi: Iran threat trumps economic crisis
Keeping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons ranks above the economy in the challenges facing leaders in the 21st century, Likud head Binyamin Netanyahu told the World Economic Forum on Thursday.
Netanyahu said the global financial meltdown was reversible but the acquisition of nuclear weapons by a "fanatic radical regime" was not. "We have never had, since the dawn of the nuclear age, nuclear weapons in the hands of such a fanatical regime," he added.
Bibi: al Qaeda will destroy holiest Christian site
Benjamin Netanyahu, the favorite to win the upcoming Israeli election, says al Qaeda terrorists will destroy Jesus Christ's burial site.
Netanyahu, who claims he had predicted an Islamic extremists attack on the World Trade Center six years before the actual attack, said terrorists will target Church of the Holy Sepulchre also known as the Church of the Resurrection - Christianity's holiest site.
"Radical Islam is willing and will want to attack the symbolic heart of the Christian religion," said the former Israeli prime minister.
"This will incur a chain reaction we can't even envision. We will witness an escalation of religious conflict above and beyond the regional conflict we have now," Daily Telegraph quoted him as saying.
The Right-wing Likud leader said he had warned in a 1995 book -- six years before the September 11 attacks -- that "Islamist terrorists" would detonate a nuclear device in the World Trade Centre in New York.
P.S. Bibi, let me guess, will those Islamic terrorists be from Iran?
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
How does a nice Jewish girl end up tanslating and releasing Al-Qaeda Messages?
Background of Nice Jewish Girl, Rita Katz, from Wikipedia:
Rita Katz (born 1963, Basra, Iraq) is the co-founder of the SITE Institute, a private intelligence firm based in Washington, DC which focuses on tracking global terrorist networks, and intercepting and distributing secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group's communications networks.
In October, 2007, it was revealed that Katz had discovered, and issued to the Bush Administration a copy of an Osama bin Laden video which had yet to be released by Al-Qaeda. Katz issued the video via a private link to a SITE web page to White House counsel Fred F. Fielding, and Joel Bagnal, deputy assistant to the president for homeland security. Within minutes, computers registered to various parts of the Executive Branch began downloading the video, and within hours a transcript referencing SITE had appeared on FOX News.
Katz, a fluent Arabic speaker, was born in Basra in 1963 to a wealthy Iraqi Jewish family. In 1968 her father was arrested on charges of spying for Israel and the rest of the family put under house arrest. The following year Katz's father was convicted and executed in a public hanging and Katz's mother managed to escape with the children to Israel.
While in Israel, Katz served in the Israeli Defense Forces and studied politics and history at Tel Aviv University. She later married a medical student and in 1997 came to the United States with her husband who received a National Institutes of Health fellowship.
Link to the originator of the question for discussion here.
Rita Katz (born 1963, Basra, Iraq) is the co-founder of the SITE Institute, a private intelligence firm based in Washington, DC which focuses on tracking global terrorist networks, and intercepting and distributing secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group's communications networks.
In October, 2007, it was revealed that Katz had discovered, and issued to the Bush Administration a copy of an Osama bin Laden video which had yet to be released by Al-Qaeda. Katz issued the video via a private link to a SITE web page to White House counsel Fred F. Fielding, and Joel Bagnal, deputy assistant to the president for homeland security. Within minutes, computers registered to various parts of the Executive Branch began downloading the video, and within hours a transcript referencing SITE had appeared on FOX News.
Katz, a fluent Arabic speaker, was born in Basra in 1963 to a wealthy Iraqi Jewish family. In 1968 her father was arrested on charges of spying for Israel and the rest of the family put under house arrest. The following year Katz's father was convicted and executed in a public hanging and Katz's mother managed to escape with the children to Israel.
While in Israel, Katz served in the Israeli Defense Forces and studied politics and history at Tel Aviv University. She later married a medical student and in 1997 came to the United States with her husband who received a National Institutes of Health fellowship.
Link to the originator of the question for discussion here.
Gaza 2009: We Will Never Forget
All of you politically correct zionist apologizers and sycophants that have been telling me that I've been too extreme in raising the alarm that zionism can only lead to WW3 can kiss my ass. The only way it can't lead to WW3 is if it's annulled or the world continues to lie down and just watches its genociding for Jewish apartheid.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Israel To Become More Rabid Yet
The Egyptian government is reportedly pressing Hamas to hurry up and agree to a ceasefire with Israel’s outgoing Kadima-led government before next month’s elections. Several terms are yet to be agreed upon by both sides, but they have maintained a ceasefire for over a week and negotiations continue.
But if Hamas pushes the negotiations past the election, officials caution, the likely victory of a coalition led by the right-wing Likud Party, which condemned the notion of ending the war in the first place, could derail negotiations. Hamas appears to have won some key concessions from the current Israeli government, including a promise to open the long-closed border crossings, critically important as the war torn nation struggles in vain to repair the damage from the invasion. The two sides continue to differ on the length of the ceasefire and other terms.
Polls continue to show the Likud Party with a significant lead in the upcoming elections, and likely coalition partner Yisrael Beiteinu gaining enormously on the back of leader Avigdor Lieberman’s attempts to ban Arab opposition parties and his pledge to require Arabs to take a loyalty oath or lose their citizenship.
Article with links at antiwar.com
But if Hamas pushes the negotiations past the election, officials caution, the likely victory of a coalition led by the right-wing Likud Party, which condemned the notion of ending the war in the first place, could derail negotiations. Hamas appears to have won some key concessions from the current Israeli government, including a promise to open the long-closed border crossings, critically important as the war torn nation struggles in vain to repair the damage from the invasion. The two sides continue to differ on the length of the ceasefire and other terms.
Polls continue to show the Likud Party with a significant lead in the upcoming elections, and likely coalition partner Yisrael Beiteinu gaining enormously on the back of leader Avigdor Lieberman’s attempts to ban Arab opposition parties and his pledge to require Arabs to take a loyalty oath or lose their citizenship.
Article with links at antiwar.com
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Israel's Horrible Peace
Three weeks after the war on Gaza, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire but refused to terminate its so-called defensive operations. In response, Hamas declared a ceasefire for one week, until the withdrawal of Israeli troops has been completed. For many in the West, the ceasefire might seem like an occasion to celebrate, for the cessation of military hostilities on both sides will perhaps renew the peace process. But there are reasons to be critical of this ceasefire, since it continues the situation in which Israel acts unilaterally. What we are actually witnessing is a new phase of the catastrophe in Gaza. While the characteristics of this phase are not yet known, Israel's violence has become ever more evident. And perhaps this is why Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did not mention the word "peace" once in the speech he gave to announce the ceasefire. The "peace process" might soon be revealed as the other side of the coin to war -- its continuation by other means -- that simultaneously feeds it.
There are at least two lessons to be gleaned from the war on Gaza. The first is to consider how both war-making and unilateral ceasefires constitute strategies for the extension of Israel's power over the Palestinian population in Gaza, as well as for the transformation of that population. Israel unilaterally demands peaceful co- existence with the Palestinians who must resign themselves to imprisonment, or otherwise threatens them with -- and practices -- the destruction of their lives. The Palestinians have two "choices" in the Israeli script: obedience or annihilation. Obedience is not an alternative to destruction, but another way that a population can be deadened within life. It entails remaking the Palestinians of Gaza into a needy recipient of humanitarian aid, thus docile and dependent. Worse, this humanitarian aid is more often denied than granted. Israel, in other words, demands that Gazans learn to live in their territorial prison for decades to come, while remaining under Israeli occupation and revealing no sign, in the form of a missile or otherwise, of their deprived existence in this world. Instead, they are commanded to remain statistics in international humanitarian agency reports, as well as stories feeding compassionate journalists. Such is the meaning of the initial Israeli and Egyptian proposals to establish a " hudna ", or truce, (meaning no Palestinian resistance) with Hamas for 15 to 30 years. A great scenario for two states in a state of war, but far from a just one when one state is occupying the land of the other party. Hamas's proposal for a one-year hudna was, in some sense, an attempt to avoid the equally disastrous options of obedience or annihilation.
As an open-ended process, peace in Gaza mobilised disciplinary and deadly operations; for one either abided by the terms of the peace process and hoped that perhaps one's grandchildren would see the end of colonisation, or one risked arrest, torture and death by Israel or its subcontractors. But worse, and as the diplomatic efforts around the war of Gaza show, peace has also become a sort of a "civilisational imperative" that the Palestinians are asked to abide by, while abandoning their resistance to the ongoing occupation. Only if they do so will they join the civilised world, or else they will be considered evil terrorists. Need we add that the operations of this civilisational imperative are far more violent than those they seek to repress? Faced with a Palestinian refusal to play along, the open-ended peace process engenders, provokes and inflames deadly operations that carry the power -- as we have seen during the three-week war -- to annihilate, erase and dismantle all that which stands in the face of the new "civilisational imperative". Peacemaking, in Palestine, and in other places in the world, is our contemporary civilising mission, and it is deadly.
The convening of the Arab Economic Summit in Kuwait may, or may not, lead to the suspension of the Arab peace initiative. The peace process between the Palestinian Authority and Israel may also survive this recent disaster. But meanwhile, Gaza reveals that what seems to be an opposition between war and peace, obedience and annihilation, is not really so. Rather, one side feeds the other and intensifies its possibilities. Therefore, it should be evident that the choice between the peace process and war making is not a real one, as these are not two radically different projects.
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza have been subjected to Israeli occupation for 41 years. In the meantime, they were a party to a peace process for more than 18 years. Almost half of their since-1967 occupation years were spent engaged in peace performances. Should not this simple fact alert us to the affinity between peace and occupation, obedience and destruction? Might it reveal to us that peace is not always the solution to war, but is often the ground from which war is waged? And if the alert is heard, can we begin to be awakened by the chimes of peace, not only the bombs of war?
Read the entire source article by Sameera Esmeir here.
P.S. Prior to 9/11 middle-east peace activists didn't include the likes of people like myself: people who’ve learned of zionism since that date. Since learning of it, I've become outraged by it and find it absolutely repulsive, and can't see how it makes any sense. But the experienced middle-east peace activists tell me that there's good zionism and that by now that I should no longer be outraged.
These veteran middle-east peace activists have become accustomed to debating within the parameters of zionism. I don't want to talk within the parameters of zionism; I don't want to talk to zionists, rabid or nice (Dershowitz or Finkelstein). I want to talk to about dissolving zionism. I don’t want zionists in the discussion or decision. There is no nice zionism. There is no making sense with zionists. There is no possibility of peace with zionism. If you want the kind of peace that accomodates zionism, talk to someone else. I don't have the stomach for it.
It's no wonder middle-east peace activists haven't been able to achieve peace. They've been talking to zionists and trying to achieve peace while accommodating zionism. Sorry, but if you want participation from new people on the scene such as myself, you need to stop talking to zionists [which translates to kissing their asses]. I don't think it's rational, and I definitely don't want to become accustomed to it.
There are at least two lessons to be gleaned from the war on Gaza. The first is to consider how both war-making and unilateral ceasefires constitute strategies for the extension of Israel's power over the Palestinian population in Gaza, as well as for the transformation of that population. Israel unilaterally demands peaceful co- existence with the Palestinians who must resign themselves to imprisonment, or otherwise threatens them with -- and practices -- the destruction of their lives. The Palestinians have two "choices" in the Israeli script: obedience or annihilation. Obedience is not an alternative to destruction, but another way that a population can be deadened within life. It entails remaking the Palestinians of Gaza into a needy recipient of humanitarian aid, thus docile and dependent. Worse, this humanitarian aid is more often denied than granted. Israel, in other words, demands that Gazans learn to live in their territorial prison for decades to come, while remaining under Israeli occupation and revealing no sign, in the form of a missile or otherwise, of their deprived existence in this world. Instead, they are commanded to remain statistics in international humanitarian agency reports, as well as stories feeding compassionate journalists. Such is the meaning of the initial Israeli and Egyptian proposals to establish a " hudna ", or truce, (meaning no Palestinian resistance) with Hamas for 15 to 30 years. A great scenario for two states in a state of war, but far from a just one when one state is occupying the land of the other party. Hamas's proposal for a one-year hudna was, in some sense, an attempt to avoid the equally disastrous options of obedience or annihilation.
As an open-ended process, peace in Gaza mobilised disciplinary and deadly operations; for one either abided by the terms of the peace process and hoped that perhaps one's grandchildren would see the end of colonisation, or one risked arrest, torture and death by Israel or its subcontractors. But worse, and as the diplomatic efforts around the war of Gaza show, peace has also become a sort of a "civilisational imperative" that the Palestinians are asked to abide by, while abandoning their resistance to the ongoing occupation. Only if they do so will they join the civilised world, or else they will be considered evil terrorists. Need we add that the operations of this civilisational imperative are far more violent than those they seek to repress? Faced with a Palestinian refusal to play along, the open-ended peace process engenders, provokes and inflames deadly operations that carry the power -- as we have seen during the three-week war -- to annihilate, erase and dismantle all that which stands in the face of the new "civilisational imperative". Peacemaking, in Palestine, and in other places in the world, is our contemporary civilising mission, and it is deadly.
The convening of the Arab Economic Summit in Kuwait may, or may not, lead to the suspension of the Arab peace initiative. The peace process between the Palestinian Authority and Israel may also survive this recent disaster. But meanwhile, Gaza reveals that what seems to be an opposition between war and peace, obedience and annihilation, is not really so. Rather, one side feeds the other and intensifies its possibilities. Therefore, it should be evident that the choice between the peace process and war making is not a real one, as these are not two radically different projects.
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza have been subjected to Israeli occupation for 41 years. In the meantime, they were a party to a peace process for more than 18 years. Almost half of their since-1967 occupation years were spent engaged in peace performances. Should not this simple fact alert us to the affinity between peace and occupation, obedience and destruction? Might it reveal to us that peace is not always the solution to war, but is often the ground from which war is waged? And if the alert is heard, can we begin to be awakened by the chimes of peace, not only the bombs of war?
Read the entire source article by Sameera Esmeir here.
P.S. Prior to 9/11 middle-east peace activists didn't include the likes of people like myself: people who’ve learned of zionism since that date. Since learning of it, I've become outraged by it and find it absolutely repulsive, and can't see how it makes any sense. But the experienced middle-east peace activists tell me that there's good zionism and that by now that I should no longer be outraged.
These veteran middle-east peace activists have become accustomed to debating within the parameters of zionism. I don't want to talk within the parameters of zionism; I don't want to talk to zionists, rabid or nice (Dershowitz or Finkelstein). I want to talk to about dissolving zionism. I don’t want zionists in the discussion or decision. There is no nice zionism. There is no making sense with zionists. There is no possibility of peace with zionism. If you want the kind of peace that accomodates zionism, talk to someone else. I don't have the stomach for it.
It's no wonder middle-east peace activists haven't been able to achieve peace. They've been talking to zionists and trying to achieve peace while accommodating zionism. Sorry, but if you want participation from new people on the scene such as myself, you need to stop talking to zionists [which translates to kissing their asses]. I don't think it's rational, and I definitely don't want to become accustomed to it.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
AIPAC: My Fellow Americans Let Israel Finish the Job.
My fellow Americans, Look what you've done! After warning that Israel is fighting a pivotal war for its life, the expected chorus of international condemnation of Israel's actions and Europe's call for a cease-fire immediately, only one nation in the world came out and flatly declared: Let Israel finish the job. That nation is the United States of America--and the reason it had such a clear, unambiguous view of the situation is you and the rest of America Jewry. How do we do it? The answer is decades of long hard work which never ends. Not only is it hard work--but it's eternal.
AIPAC meets with every candidate running for Congress. These candidates receive in-depth briefings to help them completely understand the complexities of Israel's predicament and that of the Middle East as a whole. We even ask each candidate to author a 'position paper' on their views of the U.S.-Israel relationship--so it's clear where they stand on the subject.
Members of Congress, staffers and administration officials have come to rely on AIPACs memos. They are very busy people and they know that they can count on AIPAC for clear-eyed analysis.. We present this information in concise form to elected officials. The information and analyzes are impeccable--after all our reputation is at stake. This results in policy and legislation that make up Israel's lifeline. Unfortunately, our work has just begun! Hizballah must be defeated. And finally, The war is a diversion"!!!! Now is the time for us, American Jews, to stand up and tell our elected officials that they must demand Iran halt its pursuit of atomic arms.
August 16, 2006, Howard Friedman, President of AIPAC, in his letter of July 30, 2006 to friends and supporters of AIPAC.
See more revealing self-congratulatory AIPAC here.
P.S. Mr. Finkelstein, it seems that Mr. Friedman would disagree with you and your fellow good-guy zionist idol Mr. Chomsky on the question of Jewish power in America. Maybe its from these Americans where you and your zionist idol Chomsky get the idea that Israel follows America's orders, and that the majority of Americans support Israel. Well damn, Mr. Finkelstein, you're right in a round about way. The majority of Americans are indeed following the marching orders of these Americans...and supporting Israel.
AIPAC meets with every candidate running for Congress. These candidates receive in-depth briefings to help them completely understand the complexities of Israel's predicament and that of the Middle East as a whole. We even ask each candidate to author a 'position paper' on their views of the U.S.-Israel relationship--so it's clear where they stand on the subject.
Members of Congress, staffers and administration officials have come to rely on AIPACs memos. They are very busy people and they know that they can count on AIPAC for clear-eyed analysis.. We present this information in concise form to elected officials. The information and analyzes are impeccable--after all our reputation is at stake. This results in policy and legislation that make up Israel's lifeline. Unfortunately, our work has just begun! Hizballah must be defeated. And finally, The war is a diversion"!!!! Now is the time for us, American Jews, to stand up and tell our elected officials that they must demand Iran halt its pursuit of atomic arms.
August 16, 2006, Howard Friedman, President of AIPAC, in his letter of July 30, 2006 to friends and supporters of AIPAC.
See more revealing self-congratulatory AIPAC here.
P.S. Mr. Finkelstein, it seems that Mr. Friedman would disagree with you and your fellow good-guy zionist idol Mr. Chomsky on the question of Jewish power in America. Maybe its from these Americans where you and your zionist idol Chomsky get the idea that Israel follows America's orders, and that the majority of Americans support Israel. Well damn, Mr. Finkelstein, you're right in a round about way. The majority of Americans are indeed following the marching orders of these Americans...and supporting Israel.
Friday, January 23, 2009
Colbert: Happy Police State
And here's some especially good news for antisemites: there'll be no Jews in the FEMA camps.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Bye Bye Bush
Good bye, village idiot. You never should have been allowed to leave your parents' back yard. Yet there you were, our "decider."
You serve one good purpose: Anyone who expresses any admiration for you, is obviously another idiot.
For G+d’s Sake Speak Nicely of Jews!
Today I saw some shocking news
A journalist has UPSET Jews!!!
And now our nation’s set alight
For what he said - it just ain’t right!
He wanted to do good you see
(He’d like the Holy Land hate-free)
But sadly, ‘Zionists’ got shitty
And so, for him, I penned this ditty…
We must ALWAYS speak well of The Jews!
Never, oh never, speak ill of The Jews!
If ever you do - you’re certain to lose!
It’s acceptable, though, to speak well of The Jews
(But don’t even jest that they rhythm with ‘loose screws’!)
You can say that the pious and diligent Prots
Have less sense of humour than dogmatic Trots.
You can mention, as well, that the Catholic folk
Use ritual chants inside clouds of blue smoke.
The orthodox Christians - both Greeks and Russians -
Are used to abuse and will cop it like Prussians,
While pagans and animists thrive on contempt
For their under-washed armpits and manners unkempt.
Why not shout that most Muslims have stinky bare feet?
Whether Sunni or Shiite. it’s normal to beat
Them over the head and complain if they bleat.
How dare they, those rag heads! Why aren’t they discrete?
You can say that a Parsi (or is it a Parsee?)
Is an odious word that reminds you of karsi.
If you feel like a laugh, why not insult some Shintus?
And it’s usually fine to be vulgar to Hindus!
There is nothing so droll as teasing a Buddhist
Who usually tries to react like a Trappist
While an Atheist thanks you for calling him ’sod’
(At least you were good enough not to say ‘God’)
Never mind the murdered Palestinian foetus: Beware 'hate speech' against Jews!
But never, oh never, say boo to A Jew!
For that is disgraceful! The worst thing to do!
Remember, Jews suffer a LOT more than you
So always speak well of the self-chosen few!
Source with links here.
A journalist has UPSET Jews!!!
And now our nation’s set alight
For what he said - it just ain’t right!
He wanted to do good you see
(He’d like the Holy Land hate-free)
But sadly, ‘Zionists’ got shitty
And so, for him, I penned this ditty…
We must ALWAYS speak well of The Jews!
Never, oh never, speak ill of The Jews!
If ever you do - you’re certain to lose!
It’s acceptable, though, to speak well of The Jews
(But don’t even jest that they rhythm with ‘loose screws’!)
You can say that the pious and diligent Prots
Have less sense of humour than dogmatic Trots.
You can mention, as well, that the Catholic folk
Use ritual chants inside clouds of blue smoke.
The orthodox Christians - both Greeks and Russians -
Are used to abuse and will cop it like Prussians,
While pagans and animists thrive on contempt
For their under-washed armpits and manners unkempt.
Why not shout that most Muslims have stinky bare feet?
Whether Sunni or Shiite. it’s normal to beat
Them over the head and complain if they bleat.
How dare they, those rag heads! Why aren’t they discrete?
You can say that a Parsi (or is it a Parsee?)
Is an odious word that reminds you of karsi.
If you feel like a laugh, why not insult some Shintus?
And it’s usually fine to be vulgar to Hindus!
There is nothing so droll as teasing a Buddhist
Who usually tries to react like a Trappist
While an Atheist thanks you for calling him ’sod’
(At least you were good enough not to say ‘God’)
Never mind the murdered Palestinian foetus: Beware 'hate speech' against Jews!
But never, oh never, say boo to A Jew!
For that is disgraceful! The worst thing to do!
Remember, Jews suffer a LOT more than you
So always speak well of the self-chosen few!
Source with links here.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Gaza Villages Wiped Off the Map
How can you not admire these people? How can you not come to their aid? Is that antisemitism card that strong still? God must ask: Is it stronger than me? Is it strong enough still, to keep you from me?
9-11 Coverup Commission Does Not Approve of this Photograph
People look at a half-constructed building caught on fire in Foshan, south China's Guangdong province, Friday, Jan. 16, 2009. The fire on the 26-story office building lasted for four hours. Cause of the fire accident is under investigation. (AP Photo/Color China Photo)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
