Confronted with clear evidence that she tried to obstruct justice in the case of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman — two former top AIPAC officials slated to go on trial for espionage on June 2 — Rep. Jane Harman, a California Democrat, did what politicians usually do when forced to face unpleasant facts: she brazened it out. In a response to the Congressional Quarterly piece by Jeff Stein that has proved such an entertaining embarrassment, she brayed:
“These claims are an outrageous and recycled canard, and have no basis in fact. I never engaged in any such activity. Those who are peddling these false accusations should be ashamed of themselves.”
Notice how she doesn’t deny saying that she would “engage in any such activity,” i.e. that she would intervene with the Bush White House and the Justice Department to get the charges in the Rosen-Weissman case reduced or dropped — instead, she says she never kept her promise to the “suspected Israeli agent,” as the CQ piece described her interlocutor. What? A politician who breaks a promise? I’m shocked! — shocked!
Seriously, though, from this one might infer that Harman is utterly shameless, but, then again, maybe not. On Wednesday night, she showed up at the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s glitzy “Welcome to Washington” event, although, as Roll Call reported, “she kept a low profile. [Heard on the Hill] spotted the Congresswoman entering the theater in darkness just after the curtain went up, and then saw her slip out while performers gave their final bows.”
As Shakespeare put it in Cymbelline:
“Though those that are betrayed
Do feel the treason sharply, yet the traitor
Stands in worse case of woe.”
Could it be that Harman does have a sense of shame — or was she just trying to avoid reporters?
In any case, Rep. Harman is not alone in her shamelessness, not as long as there are people like David Frum around. Frum, you ‘ll recall, is the author of the “axis of evil” trope, fired from his White House speechwriting job for grandstanding — or, rather, for his wife’s grandstanding — and now embarked on a crusade to save the GOP from “extremism” — this from a man who wrote a book calling for the invasion of nearly every country in the Middle East, and advocating total surveillance of the American people by government authorities. He also wrote a deranged piece for National Review that attacked antiwar conservatives as “traitors.” This last is a bit much to take given his latest: a piece portraying Harman — and Rosen and Weissman — as “heroes,” and smearing US prosecutors as anti-Semites and worse.
According to Frum, the thievery of vital US intelligence engaged in by Rosen and Weissman — stealing highly classified secrets related to Al Qaeda, providing documents revealing internal US government discussions, and various other sensitive items — never happened. These acts are described in the indictment, but Frum isn’t interested in the indictment, or in even knowing the details of the government’s case. All that he tells us is that “the story is almost insanely complicated” — when it actually isn’t at all complicated, unless one is trying willfully to misunderstand the charges and their basis in fact.
Rosen and Weissman systematically milked former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin for top secret information to which he had access, and he handed over a veritable treasure trove of secrets: Franklin kept over 80 top secret documents, filched from Pentagon files, at his home, doubtless for reference in case his handlers (Rosen and Weissman) needed to answer an inquiry from their handler (Naor Gilon, chief of political affairs at the Israeli embassy). The spy nest met over a period of two years, always after taking elaborate security precautions: the indictment details one meeting during which the spies switched locations three times. These guys knew what they were doing was treasonous, and rightly feared they were being followed.
None of this makes it into Frum’s narrative, however. Instead, he narrowly focuses in on one detail of the case, and comes up with a truly lame ”explanation” for the arrest and alleged “persecution” of all involved:
“Elements within the FBI and other U.S. agencies have been convinced for years that Israeli spy agencies have penetrated the U.S. government. These anti-Israel elements responded with what spy types call a ‘mole hunt’ — a ferocious search for the suspected infiltrator. Again and again, the search has turned up empty. But from the point of view of a mole hunter, nothing is more damning than the absence of evidence: The inability to discover the mole only proves the mole’s vicious cunning!”
Gee, they thought a “mole” had penetrated our national security defenses — now why do you suppose they thought that?
From the point of view of a committed Israel-Firster like Frum, there can never be such a creature as an Israeli mole, and so a “mole hunt” only proves the inherent wickedness (and ill-disguised anti-Semitism) of the hunters. And of course, these mole-hunters are “anti-Israel” — never mind that their job requires them to protect US national security, no matter what country is trying to penetrate our defenses. We all have a duty to look the other way! Frum cites a supposed “lack of evidence,” and yet refuses to even so much as mention the details of the government’s case — except in one instance, which he manages to get totally wrong. Frum writes:
“At last, in October 2005 the mole hunters found their man: a career Defense Department employee named Larry Franklin. Franklin’s offense? Brace yourself …
“Franklin had learned of U.S. intelligence reports that Iranian sabotage teams were operating inside Iraqi Kurdistan. These reports were being disregarded for a reason very familiar in the Bush years: They contained uncomfortable news that higher-ups did not wish to know.
“Franklin, however, thought the information important — maybe vitally important. He thought it needed to be pushed up the organization chart. Lacking the clout to move the information himself, he decided to do what frustrated officials often do: He leaked it.
“Specifically, he leaked the information to two employees — American citizens both — of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, in hope that they could galvanize a response from their contacts in the White House. The two, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, shared Franklin’s information with journalists, colleagues, and the Israeli embassy. For this action, all three were charged with criminal offenses.”
In reality, the story about Iranian “sabotage teams” in Kurdistan was completely made up — by the “mole-hunters,” i.e. the FBI’s counterespionage unit, which had been watching Franklin (as well as his handlers) ever since he showed up at a luncheon attended by Rosen, Weissman, and Naor Gilon, volunteering to commit espionage on Israel’s behalf. They tracked his movements, and listened in on his phone conversations, as he responded to requests for specific information from Rosen and Weissman. After clearly establishing their target’s criminal intent, the G-men pounced, showing up at Franklin’s Alexandria, Virginia, home and confronting him with his treason. Franklin admitted his crimes, and agreed to help the feds nab his accomplices in exchange for leniency.
Toward that end, the FBI planted a story — the Kurdistan “sabotage team” story — and sent a “turned” Franklin to meet with his co-conspirators. Franklin told Rosen and Weissman that Israelis who had infiltrated Kurdistan and were engaged in “training” Kurdish militias were in mortal danger from Iranian “saboteurs,” and that furthermore this information was highly classified: he warned them not to use it. It didn’t take too long for them to leak it, bigtime, not only to the Israeli embassy and other AIPAC employees, but to the media as well.
The point of planting this story was to clearly establish the criminal intent of the two AIPAC spies and seal the legal case against them. It’s not clear whether Frum just doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or if he’s deliberately using this story to throw up a smokescreen so as to avoid mentioning the real crimes of Rosen and Weissman — in Frum’s case, I would tilt toward the latter. Whatever — the fact is that Frum is misinforming his readers on a story that is easily checked. Whether it’s sheer laziness, or the habit of deception, I leave to my readers (and Frum’s editors) to decide.
While Frum’s response to the Harman spy scandal is all too predictable, the response from Congress has been to call for an investigation — not of Harman, but of those who uncovered her corruption! If Rep. Harman was overheard telling an Israeli agent that she’d help him get the charges dropped or reduced, in return for political favors from AIPAC — then it’s the eavesdroppers who’re at fault and must be brought to justice. It doesn’t seem to matter that the FBI went before a judge and got approval before they started listening in — nor does the fact that they weren’t listening in on Harman, specifically, but on the “suspected Israeli agent.” All the Democratic-controlled Congress is concerned with is protecting one of its own.
I might add that the Republicans, who are usually quick to pounce on the merest hint of scandal in Democratic ranks, have said not one word about Harman’s embarrassing ties to a spy nest — not a peep. Which makes sense, because they’re just as firmly in the Lobby’s pocket as the Democrats in Congress. Not to mention that whiff of Bush era corruption wafting into the room once we take into account the quashing of the investigation into Harman by then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who saved her skin by averring “We need Jane.” Rep. Harman was the Bush administration’s biggest Democratic ally when it came to massively violating the civil liberties of Americans.
Both parties are in this up to their necks. That’s why Obama’s Justice Department is now openly leaking the information that they’re considering dropping the charges against the AIPAC spies — with nary a protest from either side of the aisle.
It looks like Harman, Frum, and the Lobby have won, after all — despite the mountains of evidence against Rosen and Weissman, and the protests of hardworking patriotic law enforcement officials who are dismayed and demoralized by the blank check our Justice Department is giving Israel to spy and steal our secrets with impunity. They leaked the dirt on Harman out of desperation, in the hope that popular outrage would prevent Israel’s American spies from beating the law and slithering back to their nests.
These decisions, of course, are never made in a vacuum: it’s all about politics, and the politic thing to do is to give in to the Lobby, and neo-Pollardites like Frum. Overseas, this will score the administration some brownie points in Israel, and perhaps soften the right-wing government’s increasingly intransigent stance against the new American president, while domestically it will placate and temporarily silence a vocal claque of critics.
After all, what else could we expect a self-proclaimed “pragmatist” to do?
In a better world [in a world that's rightside up, a non-zionist world], a member of Congress caught on tape agreeing to obstruct justice at the request of an agent of a foreign power would have stepped down as soon as the news hit the headlines. In our shameless era, however, that isn’t likely to happen. Instead, the spies will get off, Israel will continue to steal us blind, and a trial that would have shocked the American people and portrayed Israel in a far more realistic light than our news media dares will never take place.
How’s that for change we can believe in?
However, it doesn’t have to turn out that way. It could be that the patriotic, pro-national security counter-intelligence officials who have exposed the AIPAC spy nest and their enablers in government will have their hopes vindicated — their hope that the American people will protest once they understand how and why espionage is allowed to be practiced openly in our nation’s capital, protected and defended in the very halls of Congress.
The outlook of this shocking case doesn’t look too good at the moment, but that could change — if enough Americans are informed and angry enough to protest. The decision to drop the case, as of this writing, has yet to be made: it’s only that they’re considering dropping it. There’s just one way to lodge your protest, at this point, and that is to contact the US Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Virginia, where the case is being tried.
Remember, there are no doubt people in that office fighting to keep this case alive — so be polite. Briefly express your disappointment upon reading news reports that the case might be dropped, and your hope that this is not the case.
Call 703-299-3700 — and remember, be nice!
Or, better yet, write a letter, send a telegram, or whatever, and address it to:
US Attorney
Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s Building
2100 Jamieson Ave
Alexandria, VA 22314
Source article is here.
P.S. Should there be some separation between Israel and the United States? Or are we them and viceversa?
Friday, April 24, 2009
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Lying Zionists Exculpate Themselves of War Crimes
The Israel Defense Forces announced on Wednesday that an internal investigation has determined that no civilians were purposefully harmed by IDF troops during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip.
Following the release of the investigation results, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that the army's willingness to probe itself "once again proves that the IDF is one of the most moral armies in the world.
Source article is here.
P.S. How long will the civilized world tolerate the zionist criminal lying logic and having every value of human decency turned upside down?
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Stupid Stunt Reveals Israel's Grip on the West
Stupid Stunt to Silence Meaningful Debate
The truth never suits Israel's flag-wavers and stooges. They have to twist it or strangulate it.
When Mr. Ahmadjinedad got up to speak at the UN racism conference the British Ambassador, Peter Gooderham, was among those who walked out in the worst show of diplomatic bad manners this century. Gooderham is reported to have said that "such inflammatory rhetoric has no place whatsoever in a United Nations conference addressing the whole issue of racism and how to address it.
"As soon as President Ahmadinejad, started talking about Israel, that was the cue for us to walk out. We agreed in advance that if there was any such rhetoric there would be no tolerance for it." Referring to the Iranian leader's accusation of Israeli racism he added: "That is a charge we unreservedly condemn and so we had no hesitation at that point in leaving the conference hall."
TV inquisitor Jeremy Paxman asked Gooderham the difference between Zionism and racism, to which he replied that Zionism is a political movement and racism is something else - we recognize it when we see it.
The trouble is, these characters don't recognize it at all. Nor are they daily on the receiving end, as the Palestinians are, of Israel's brutal racist policies. Nor were they under Israel's genocidal blitzkrieg on Gaza that vaporized and incinerated women and children in their hundreds and blew their body-parts to kingdom-come.
Everyone knows that the Zionist project aims to create a Jewish state from the Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea and from the Euphrates to the Nile by ethnically cleansing the Arab population from their homeland, stealing their lands and resources at gunpoint, and effectively wiping Palestine off the map. If that isn't naked racism, what is it? Haven’t Mr. Gooderham and his colleagues read the manifestoes of the Likud and Kadima parties?
The question is, why do supposedly moral and civilized people support it and seek to perpetuate it?
Right on cue David Miliband, Britain's foreign secretary, condemned President Ahmadinejad's remarks about Israel being a 'racist government' as “offensive, inflammatory and utterly unacceptable." He didn't say why.
Indeed, nobody has explained what was offensive about the Iranian president's speech. He presented the unvarnished truth. The offence was refusing to listen. But truth has been a major casualty at the UN for 60 years. It doesn't help when its Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, whines about "this august platform" being used "to accuse, divide and even incite. This is the opposite of what this conference seeks to achieve." And what exactly are the powers-that-be seeking to achieve, if not to whitewash the truth as usual?
Last November's Bulletin Board of the Board of Deputies of British Jews - the equivalent in Britain of AIPAC - announced that Elizabeth Harris, their Director of Public Affairs, attended the “preparatory committee” meeting in Geneva for the Anti-racism Conference and used the opportunity to have "constructive" meetings with the British Ambassador and representatives of other European countries. No doubt that's when the stooges received their orders.
So the walkout at the UN had long been premeditated and pre-planned. It was a stupid stunt.
The biggest disgrace is that racist thugs in Tel Aviv are able orchestrate such a thing. It is now self-evident that Zionists have infiltrated and embedded themselves in the political, financial, economic and social fabric of the western world to everyone else’s detriment.
Source article is here.
P.S. It's surprising how grown men were so easily willing to cowtow and shame themselves publicly as puppets for an empty ideology such as Jewish apartheid.
The truth never suits Israel's flag-wavers and stooges. They have to twist it or strangulate it.
When Mr. Ahmadjinedad got up to speak at the UN racism conference the British Ambassador, Peter Gooderham, was among those who walked out in the worst show of diplomatic bad manners this century. Gooderham is reported to have said that "such inflammatory rhetoric has no place whatsoever in a United Nations conference addressing the whole issue of racism and how to address it.
"As soon as President Ahmadinejad, started talking about Israel, that was the cue for us to walk out. We agreed in advance that if there was any such rhetoric there would be no tolerance for it." Referring to the Iranian leader's accusation of Israeli racism he added: "That is a charge we unreservedly condemn and so we had no hesitation at that point in leaving the conference hall."
TV inquisitor Jeremy Paxman asked Gooderham the difference between Zionism and racism, to which he replied that Zionism is a political movement and racism is something else - we recognize it when we see it.
The trouble is, these characters don't recognize it at all. Nor are they daily on the receiving end, as the Palestinians are, of Israel's brutal racist policies. Nor were they under Israel's genocidal blitzkrieg on Gaza that vaporized and incinerated women and children in their hundreds and blew their body-parts to kingdom-come.
Everyone knows that the Zionist project aims to create a Jewish state from the Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea and from the Euphrates to the Nile by ethnically cleansing the Arab population from their homeland, stealing their lands and resources at gunpoint, and effectively wiping Palestine off the map. If that isn't naked racism, what is it? Haven’t Mr. Gooderham and his colleagues read the manifestoes of the Likud and Kadima parties?
The question is, why do supposedly moral and civilized people support it and seek to perpetuate it?
Right on cue David Miliband, Britain's foreign secretary, condemned President Ahmadinejad's remarks about Israel being a 'racist government' as “offensive, inflammatory and utterly unacceptable." He didn't say why.
Indeed, nobody has explained what was offensive about the Iranian president's speech. He presented the unvarnished truth. The offence was refusing to listen. But truth has been a major casualty at the UN for 60 years. It doesn't help when its Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, whines about "this august platform" being used "to accuse, divide and even incite. This is the opposite of what this conference seeks to achieve." And what exactly are the powers-that-be seeking to achieve, if not to whitewash the truth as usual?
Last November's Bulletin Board of the Board of Deputies of British Jews - the equivalent in Britain of AIPAC - announced that Elizabeth Harris, their Director of Public Affairs, attended the “preparatory committee” meeting in Geneva for the Anti-racism Conference and used the opportunity to have "constructive" meetings with the British Ambassador and representatives of other European countries. No doubt that's when the stooges received their orders.
So the walkout at the UN had long been premeditated and pre-planned. It was a stupid stunt.
The biggest disgrace is that racist thugs in Tel Aviv are able orchestrate such a thing. It is now self-evident that Zionists have infiltrated and embedded themselves in the political, financial, economic and social fabric of the western world to everyone else’s detriment.
Source article is here.
P.S. It's surprising how grown men were so easily willing to cowtow and shame themselves publicly as puppets for an empty ideology such as Jewish apartheid.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Bishop Chastized for Questioning Pavlovic Myth
Everyone must get on bended knee and bow before the holocaust altar. Hey, it's easy for most Americans. It's automatic.
Monday, April 20, 2009
How Israel kills at will and in total impunity while the world asks the Palestinians for non-violent resistance
On April the 17th, like any Friday afternoon for the last 4 years, the small village of Bil’in, north of Ramallah, was preparing for the usual demonstration against Israel’s annexation wall … The village of Bil’in has, since the mid eighties, lost more than 60% of its land for the purpose of Israeli growing settlements and the construction of the wall. The inhabitants of the village used to live mainly from agriculture and olive tree plantations but more and more, the people of Bil’in have to rely on the women to survive. Embroidery has become one of the main resource of the place, located a few kilometres away from Tel Aviv (on a nice day, you can see the “inaccessible”–for the Palestinians– beach from the roof tops of Bil’in).
In January 2005, a village committee (led by Mohamed Khatib, Iyad Burnat and Abdullah Abu Rahme) was created and a month later non-violent demonstrations started, first taking part every day, then once a week, on Yum Al Juma’a (Friday, day of prayer).
The village won a huge battle in August 2008 when the Israeli High Court of Justice ruled that the new route of the barrier in Bil’in was in violation of the Court ruling released on September 2007 (which ruled that the Wall path was prejudicial to Bil’in and must be altered) and ordered the State to present within 45 days a new route, which will uphold the principles of the ruling.
On Friday the 17th of April 2009, the wall still had not moved one inch and while the inhabitants of the village were praying at the village mosque, many internationals (coming from all around the world) and the strong Israeli contingent (including people from the Alternative Information Centre and Anarchists Against the Wall were looking for some shade (to hide from the baking sun) and chatting about the day’s event. As soon as prayer was over with, the demonstration started to move forward in direction of the wall, a few kilometres away.
You can be sure that Bassem (aka Phil) was right at the front of the march. He always was. I had met Bassem a few times while visiting Bil’in. He was a strong looking man, singing the loudest, joking all the time, jumping around and leading the way, accompanied by the rest of the village committee and the Israeli contingent.
As it usually happens, as soon as the march reached the corner where the Israeli soldiers can be seen, the tear gas started. A few brave ones, always continue anyway and reach the beginning of the wall, after a few minutes. Bassem, as usual, was one of those. The Israelis present at the front of the demonstration started talking with the nearby soldiers in Hebrew and Bassem too, screamed “We are in a non violent protest, there are kids and internationals…”. He was shot in the chest and never managed to finished his sentence. He fell on the ground, moved a little bit, fell again, and died. See a report with video and pictures here.
Bassem was shot by a new kind of Tear Gas, called “the rocket”. The soldier who shot was a mere 40 meters away. This is the same type of tear gas that critically injured US citizen Tristan Anderson a few weeks ago. Those tear gas canisters are as fast and lethal as live ammunition. Very hard to get away from. Normally, tear gas canisters fly in the air for a long time, then fall and bounce a few times. Those ones fly like a bullet and go straight, not up and down.
Once more, Israel using the West Bank as its testing ground, the Palestinians as guinea pigs.
The soldier who fired, knew what he was doing and who he was targeting. The shame is that he probably knew Bassem. Bassem was always at the front, and had been for a few years now. The soldiers often come back more than once in Bil’in and start to get to know the ones facing them. Bassem did not get a chance to say hi, or bye.
On April the 17th , Bil’in and Palestine lost one of their heroes.
What is going to happen next?
Israel has already said that it will investigate the incident (out of every single investigation into such crimes, only 6% of the soldiers were ever prosecuted, often let off with a few weeks suspension), but before it did, started the usual propaganda, saying that the protest had been really violent and that the soldiers had to react (the video of the demonstration clearly shows otherwise).
We might even hear in a few days that it was actually the Palestinians who fired the tear gas and killed their beloved friend.
The P.A, instead of issuing the strongest statement against this act, stopping once and for all the negotiations with the Israeli government and joining the demonstrators every Friday to be hand in hand with its people, said next to nothing, and is looking forward to the coming up White House meeting between Mahmoud Abbas and Obama.
The media hardly reported this. The Palestinians do not count. Even more shocking when a video of the event is available to all and could have been used to great effect.
The international community (for what it means) will not mention this “incident” (it is for them) and continue issuing calls for the Palestinians to renounce violence and resist peacefully while saying nothing about Israel’s killings (since the start of the second intifada, 87% of the dead have been Palestinians), violations of international law and oppression of the Palestinians.
It is therefore down to us, the citizens of this world, to act, join solidarity groups, write articles, make films and talk, constantly, about the plight of the Palestinian people. Palestine has to become the number one issue.
This is a must.
For Bassem, his family, Bil’in and Palestine.
Frank Barat is in the organizing committee of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine and a member of Palestine Solidarity Campaign UK.
The village of Bil’in is organizing its fourth conference from the 22nd till the 24th of April. For more information click here.
Source article is here.
P.S. Hey Norman... Finkelstein. I know you're studying Gandhi and are anxious to expound on peaceful resistance for the Palestinians. The recent Gaza massacre by your co-religionists was so embarrassing that you put a hold on your plans. I suggest you go to Bil'in and start your campaign there.
This guy Max gets it
Subject (from myspace): For those of you who criticize me on my JEWISH stance, here
Listen guys, you can say whatever you want to make yourselves feel better, but the fact is MOST Jews are Jewish Supremacists, or at least sympathizers. ALL Jews only make up 2% of the entire U.S. population but wherever you look and find anything, any group, agenda that is SUBVERSIVE to the U.S. you will find Jews leading the way, that is just a fact. EVen Jews who do not take an active roll in this anti-American network, benefit from it and they know it, so they look the other way. There ARE exceptions but they are RARE and in numbers they are insignificant. We are late in the game, and in my opinion these people need to be exposed. If you disagree that's fine. Alex Jones disagrees with me on this and I'm his biggest fan. I guess we will see in the end how it all plays out. All I know is that the powers that be want YOU and ME dead! And its coming quick. I personally think we need to quit pussyfooting around about it, but that's just me and I will continue to do what I do. You do it your way. -max
p.s. People like Alex Jones find the whole "racist" anti-Semite, redneck, mean people, prejudice, ignoramouses to be a big turn-off and not a recipe for success in waking people up, right. I can see that argument. I could see it a LOT MORE if Jews made up 25% of the population or even 18%........OR even 12%. I could see the argument then. But, when you have a 2% minority that has a compelete stranglehold on the U.S. Media where the American citizen has gotten the information and opinions to make their own opinions, the complete BRAINWASHNG that has gone on for a hundred years!!!! in this country, you've got a MAJOR JEW PROBLEM. They run the State Department, the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve, the IMF, the World Bank, etc, etc, etc,, they run the White House, ALWAYS DO from behind the scenes. Obama's own Chief of Staff, his brain, is a radicalized Jewish Supremacist!!!! THAT IS A FACT. And HE tells Obama what to do.
Obama's OWN National Security Advisor takes his DAILY ORDERS from known Rothshild Crime Syndicate operative Dr. Henry Kissinger. He ADMITTED IT!!!!!! Kissinger is a Jew. George W. Bush met with Kissinger once a week, every week during his entire 8 years in the White House and said he was his most important and influential advisor!!!!
WHAT WE HAVE MEN, is a Jew problem.
I am not, nor would I ever condone any violence against Jews, certainly not the ones who are not directly involved in the criminal networks but I do condone Jews being EXPOSED, and NEUTRALIZED!!!! They have orchestrated and supported the downfall, the spiritual, moral, and economic DESTRUCTION OF THIS COUNTRY. THAT IS A FACT. I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT HURTING THEIR FEELINGS. THEY WERE ALL INVOLVED IN THIS BY THEIR SILENCE IF NOTHING ELSE. -max
P.S. If you don't see that the jews control this country--and absolutely, you're blind... or you're just so well conditioned that you're afraid to see that truth and admit it, which is a genuine American phenomenon. Has anyone noticed that "anti-semitic" and truth seem to be going hand in hand more and more? Now why would that be? -- Yours truly, Rick.
Listen guys, you can say whatever you want to make yourselves feel better, but the fact is MOST Jews are Jewish Supremacists, or at least sympathizers. ALL Jews only make up 2% of the entire U.S. population but wherever you look and find anything, any group, agenda that is SUBVERSIVE to the U.S. you will find Jews leading the way, that is just a fact. EVen Jews who do not take an active roll in this anti-American network, benefit from it and they know it, so they look the other way. There ARE exceptions but they are RARE and in numbers they are insignificant. We are late in the game, and in my opinion these people need to be exposed. If you disagree that's fine. Alex Jones disagrees with me on this and I'm his biggest fan. I guess we will see in the end how it all plays out. All I know is that the powers that be want YOU and ME dead! And its coming quick. I personally think we need to quit pussyfooting around about it, but that's just me and I will continue to do what I do. You do it your way. -max
p.s. People like Alex Jones find the whole "racist" anti-Semite, redneck, mean people, prejudice, ignoramouses to be a big turn-off and not a recipe for success in waking people up, right. I can see that argument. I could see it a LOT MORE if Jews made up 25% of the population or even 18%........OR even 12%. I could see the argument then. But, when you have a 2% minority that has a compelete stranglehold on the U.S. Media where the American citizen has gotten the information and opinions to make their own opinions, the complete BRAINWASHNG that has gone on for a hundred years!!!! in this country, you've got a MAJOR JEW PROBLEM. They run the State Department, the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve, the IMF, the World Bank, etc, etc, etc,, they run the White House, ALWAYS DO from behind the scenes. Obama's own Chief of Staff, his brain, is a radicalized Jewish Supremacist!!!! THAT IS A FACT. And HE tells Obama what to do.
Obama's OWN National Security Advisor takes his DAILY ORDERS from known Rothshild Crime Syndicate operative Dr. Henry Kissinger. He ADMITTED IT!!!!!! Kissinger is a Jew. George W. Bush met with Kissinger once a week, every week during his entire 8 years in the White House and said he was his most important and influential advisor!!!!
WHAT WE HAVE MEN, is a Jew problem.
I am not, nor would I ever condone any violence against Jews, certainly not the ones who are not directly involved in the criminal networks but I do condone Jews being EXPOSED, and NEUTRALIZED!!!! They have orchestrated and supported the downfall, the spiritual, moral, and economic DESTRUCTION OF THIS COUNTRY. THAT IS A FACT. I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT HURTING THEIR FEELINGS. THEY WERE ALL INVOLVED IN THIS BY THEIR SILENCE IF NOTHING ELSE. -max
P.S. If you don't see that the jews control this country--and absolutely, you're blind... or you're just so well conditioned that you're afraid to see that truth and admit it, which is a genuine American phenomenon. Has anyone noticed that "anti-semitic" and truth seem to be going hand in hand more and more? Now why would that be? -- Yours truly, Rick.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
"The American taxpayers are the Jews for Obama's ovens."
I bet this guy didn't get a free pass to The Glenn Beck Show.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Dennis Ross's "Kinetic" Iran Plan
When Dennis Ross, a hawkish, pro-Israel adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign, was elevated in February to the post of special adviser on "the Gulf and Southwest Asia"--i.e., Iran--Ross's critics hoped that his influence would be marginal. After all, unlike special envoys George Mitchell (Israel-Palestine) and Richard Holbrooke (Afghanistan-Pakistan), whose appointments were announced with fanfare, Ross's appointment was long delayed and then announced quietly, at night, in a press release.
But diplomats and Middle East watchers hoping Ross would be sidelined are wrong. He is building an empire at the State Department: hiring staff and, with his legendary flair for bureaucratic wrangling, cementing liaisons with a wide range of US officials. The Iran portfolio is his, says an insider. "Everything we've seen indicates that Ross has completely taken over the issue," says a key Iran specialist. "He's acting as if he's the guy. Wherever you go at State, they tell you, 'You've gotta go through Dennis.'"
It's paradoxical that Obama, who made opening a dialogue with Iran into a crucial plank in his campaign, would hand the Iran file to Ross. Since taking office, Obama has taken a number of important steps to open lines to Iran, including a remarkable holiday greeting by video in which the president spoke directly to "the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran," adding, "We seek engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect." He invited Iran to attend an international conference on Afghanistan, where a top Iranian diplomat shook hands with Holbrooke; he's allowing American diplomats to engage their Iranian counterparts; and he's reportedly planning to dispatch a letter directly to Iran's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet Ross, like his neoconservative co-thinkers, is explicitly skeptical about the usefulness of diplomacy with Iran.
Widely viewed as a cog in the machine of Israel's Washington lobby, Ross was not likely to be welcomed in Tehran--and he wasn't. Iran's state radio described his appointment as "an apparent contradiction" with Obama's "announced policy to bring change in United States foreign policy." Kazem Jalali, a hardline member of the Iranian parliament's national security committee, joked that it "would have been so much better to pick Ariel Sharon or Ehud Olmert as special envoy to Iran." More seriously, a former White House official says that Ross has told colleagues that he believes the United States will ultimately have no choice but to attack Iran in response to its nuclear program.
Not quite a neoconservative himself, Ross has palled around with neocons for most of his career. In the 1970s and '80s he worked alongside Paul Wolfowitz at the Defense and State Departments, and with Andrew Marshall, a neoconservative strategist who leads the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessments. In 1985 Ross helped launch the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the Israel lobby's leading think tank.
From the late 1980s through 2000, Ross served as point man on Arab-Israeli issues for George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, acquiring a reputation as a highly skilled diplomat, albeit one with a pronounced pro-Israel tilt. He led the US side at the July 2000 Camp David summit, but he was deeply mistrusted by Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat, and the feeling was mutual. At a crucial moment in the negotiations, Ross threw a tantrum, hurling a briefing book into a table full of juice and fruit. Not surprisingly, when Arafat rejected the Israelis' less-than-generous offer, Ross heaped blame on the Palestinians for scuttling the talks, the failure of which led directly to Ariel Sharon's rise to power and the second intifada. Daniel Kurtzer, an Orthodox Jew who served as US ambassador to Israel and Egypt and who was one of Obama's top Middle East advisers last year, co-wrote a book in which he explained, "The perception always was that Dennis started from the Israeli bottom line, that he listened to what Israel wanted and then tried to sell it to the Arabs."
From 2001 until his appointment in February, Ross was at WINEP, where he helped to oversee a series of reports designed to ring alarm bells about Iran's nuclear research and to support closer US-Israeli ties in response. Last summer, while advising Obama, he co-chaired a task force that produced a paper titled "Strengthening the Partnership: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge." That report opted for an alarmist view of Iran's nuclear program and proposed that the next president set up a formal US-Israeli mechanism for coordinating policy toward Iran (including any future need for "preventive military action"). Along with Holbrooke, Ross also helped found United Against Nuclear Iran, a group established to publicize warnings about Iran to the American public and the media. UANI's advisory board includes former CIA director James Woolsey and Fouad Ajami, perhaps the top Middle East expert for the neoconservative movement.
In September, Ross served as a key member of another task force organized by the Bipartisan Policy Center. The group assembled a flock of hawks under the leadership of Michael Makovsky, brother of WINEP's David Makovsky, who served in the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the heyday of the Pentagon neocons from 2002 to 2006. Its report, "Meeting the Challenge: U.S. Policy Toward Iranian Nuclear Development"--written by Michael Rubin, a neoconservative hardliner at the American Enterprise Institute--read like a declaration of war.
The core of the Bipartisan Policy Center report predicted that diplomacy with Iran is likely to fail. Anticipating failure, Ross and his colleagues recommended "prepositioning military assets" by the United States--i.e., a military buildup--coupled with a US "show of force" in the Gulf. This would be followed almost immediately by a blockade of Iranian gasoline imports and oil exports, meant to paralyze Iran's economy, followed by what they call, not so euphemistically, "kinetic action."
That "kinetic action"--a US assault on Iran--should, in fact, be massive, suggested the Ross-Rubin task force. It should hit dozens of sites alleged to be part of Iran's nuclear research program, along with other targets, including Iranian air defense sites, Revolutionary Guard facilities, much of Iran's military-industrial complex, communications systems, munitions storage facilities, airfields and naval facilities. Eventually, the report concluded, the United States would also have to attack Iran's ground forces, electric power plants and electrical grids, bridges and "manufacturing plants, including steel, autos, buses, etc."
Like virtually all of his neoconservative confreres, Ross does not argue that negotiations with Iran should not proceed. Surrendering to the inevitability of a US-Iran dialogue, they insist instead that any such talks proceed according to a strict time limit, measured in weeks or, at most, a few months. In November, Iran specialist Patrick Clawson, Ross's colleague at WINEP, described any US-Iran dialogue that might emerge as mere theater. "What we've got to do is...show the world that we're doing a heck of a lot to try and engage the Iranians," he said. "Our principal target with these offers [to Iran] is not Iran. Our principal target with these offers is, in fact, American public opinion [and] world public opinion." Once that's done, he implied, the United States would have to take out its big stick.
The reality, however, is that negotiations between Iran and the United States might take many, many months, perhaps years. Putting US-Iran diplomacy on a short fuse, as Ross and his colleagues want to do, guarantees its failure, setting the stage for harsher sanctions, embargoes and the "kinetic action" that Ross has suggested might follow.
Source article is here.
But diplomats and Middle East watchers hoping Ross would be sidelined are wrong. He is building an empire at the State Department: hiring staff and, with his legendary flair for bureaucratic wrangling, cementing liaisons with a wide range of US officials. The Iran portfolio is his, says an insider. "Everything we've seen indicates that Ross has completely taken over the issue," says a key Iran specialist. "He's acting as if he's the guy. Wherever you go at State, they tell you, 'You've gotta go through Dennis.'"
It's paradoxical that Obama, who made opening a dialogue with Iran into a crucial plank in his campaign, would hand the Iran file to Ross. Since taking office, Obama has taken a number of important steps to open lines to Iran, including a remarkable holiday greeting by video in which the president spoke directly to "the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran," adding, "We seek engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect." He invited Iran to attend an international conference on Afghanistan, where a top Iranian diplomat shook hands with Holbrooke; he's allowing American diplomats to engage their Iranian counterparts; and he's reportedly planning to dispatch a letter directly to Iran's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet Ross, like his neoconservative co-thinkers, is explicitly skeptical about the usefulness of diplomacy with Iran.
Widely viewed as a cog in the machine of Israel's Washington lobby, Ross was not likely to be welcomed in Tehran--and he wasn't. Iran's state radio described his appointment as "an apparent contradiction" with Obama's "announced policy to bring change in United States foreign policy." Kazem Jalali, a hardline member of the Iranian parliament's national security committee, joked that it "would have been so much better to pick Ariel Sharon or Ehud Olmert as special envoy to Iran." More seriously, a former White House official says that Ross has told colleagues that he believes the United States will ultimately have no choice but to attack Iran in response to its nuclear program.
Not quite a neoconservative himself, Ross has palled around with neocons for most of his career. In the 1970s and '80s he worked alongside Paul Wolfowitz at the Defense and State Departments, and with Andrew Marshall, a neoconservative strategist who leads the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessments. In 1985 Ross helped launch the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the Israel lobby's leading think tank.
From the late 1980s through 2000, Ross served as point man on Arab-Israeli issues for George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, acquiring a reputation as a highly skilled diplomat, albeit one with a pronounced pro-Israel tilt. He led the US side at the July 2000 Camp David summit, but he was deeply mistrusted by Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat, and the feeling was mutual. At a crucial moment in the negotiations, Ross threw a tantrum, hurling a briefing book into a table full of juice and fruit. Not surprisingly, when Arafat rejected the Israelis' less-than-generous offer, Ross heaped blame on the Palestinians for scuttling the talks, the failure of which led directly to Ariel Sharon's rise to power and the second intifada. Daniel Kurtzer, an Orthodox Jew who served as US ambassador to Israel and Egypt and who was one of Obama's top Middle East advisers last year, co-wrote a book in which he explained, "The perception always was that Dennis started from the Israeli bottom line, that he listened to what Israel wanted and then tried to sell it to the Arabs."
From 2001 until his appointment in February, Ross was at WINEP, where he helped to oversee a series of reports designed to ring alarm bells about Iran's nuclear research and to support closer US-Israeli ties in response. Last summer, while advising Obama, he co-chaired a task force that produced a paper titled "Strengthening the Partnership: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge." That report opted for an alarmist view of Iran's nuclear program and proposed that the next president set up a formal US-Israeli mechanism for coordinating policy toward Iran (including any future need for "preventive military action"). Along with Holbrooke, Ross also helped found United Against Nuclear Iran, a group established to publicize warnings about Iran to the American public and the media. UANI's advisory board includes former CIA director James Woolsey and Fouad Ajami, perhaps the top Middle East expert for the neoconservative movement.
In September, Ross served as a key member of another task force organized by the Bipartisan Policy Center. The group assembled a flock of hawks under the leadership of Michael Makovsky, brother of WINEP's David Makovsky, who served in the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the heyday of the Pentagon neocons from 2002 to 2006. Its report, "Meeting the Challenge: U.S. Policy Toward Iranian Nuclear Development"--written by Michael Rubin, a neoconservative hardliner at the American Enterprise Institute--read like a declaration of war.
The core of the Bipartisan Policy Center report predicted that diplomacy with Iran is likely to fail. Anticipating failure, Ross and his colleagues recommended "prepositioning military assets" by the United States--i.e., a military buildup--coupled with a US "show of force" in the Gulf. This would be followed almost immediately by a blockade of Iranian gasoline imports and oil exports, meant to paralyze Iran's economy, followed by what they call, not so euphemistically, "kinetic action."
That "kinetic action"--a US assault on Iran--should, in fact, be massive, suggested the Ross-Rubin task force. It should hit dozens of sites alleged to be part of Iran's nuclear research program, along with other targets, including Iranian air defense sites, Revolutionary Guard facilities, much of Iran's military-industrial complex, communications systems, munitions storage facilities, airfields and naval facilities. Eventually, the report concluded, the United States would also have to attack Iran's ground forces, electric power plants and electrical grids, bridges and "manufacturing plants, including steel, autos, buses, etc."
Like virtually all of his neoconservative confreres, Ross does not argue that negotiations with Iran should not proceed. Surrendering to the inevitability of a US-Iran dialogue, they insist instead that any such talks proceed according to a strict time limit, measured in weeks or, at most, a few months. In November, Iran specialist Patrick Clawson, Ross's colleague at WINEP, described any US-Iran dialogue that might emerge as mere theater. "What we've got to do is...show the world that we're doing a heck of a lot to try and engage the Iranians," he said. "Our principal target with these offers [to Iran] is not Iran. Our principal target with these offers is, in fact, American public opinion [and] world public opinion." Once that's done, he implied, the United States would have to take out its big stick.
The reality, however, is that negotiations between Iran and the United States might take many, many months, perhaps years. Putting US-Iran diplomacy on a short fuse, as Ross and his colleagues want to do, guarantees its failure, setting the stage for harsher sanctions, embargoes and the "kinetic action" that Ross has suggested might follow.
Source article is here.
Friday, April 10, 2009
Netanyahu To The West: Destroy Iran Before Israel Destroys You
“What would serve the Jew-hating world better as repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a nuclear winter? Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?” – Professor David Perlmutter, writing in the Los Angeles Times, April 7, 2002
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…We have the capability to take the world down with us, and I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” – Martin Van Creveld, Israeli Historian
In early February 2009, a mere few days before the elections in Israel that delivered into Benjamin Netanyahu’s hands the launch codes to several hundred nuclear weapons aimed at every major capital in the Western world, former U.S. Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller predicted that upon assuming the seat of power Netanyahu’s first priority would be “strategic conversation” with America’s new president, Barack Obama. Miller further predicted that the aim of this “very serious” conversation would be to “scare the daylights out of the president”, the ultimate objective of which would be mobilizing–not only the United States, but indeed the entire “international community”–into addressing the Iranian situation in a manner deemed “acceptable” to the Jewish state and her agenda.
Now, almost as if Miller were some wizard with a magic crystal ball, indeed Netanyahu (the same former Israeli commando-turned politician who gloated over the deaths of 3,000 Americans on 9/11 saying the event was “good” because it would generate “immediate sympathy” for Israel) has made good on the former diplomat’s predictions and delivered his threats, and not only to America but as well to the entire Western world. Rather than do it face to face with the US President however, he chose instead to use his own personal emissary, none other than writer Jeffrey Goldberg, pro-Zionist fanatic, propagandist, de-facto disinformation agent for a foreign power and more-than-willing accomplice to Israel’s war crimes, both in the Middle East and beyond.
Appearing in last month’s Atlantic magazine, Goldberg’s piece entitled “Netanyahu to Obama: Stop Iran—Or I Will” features newly-made capo di tutti capi “Bibi” dishing up a whole smorgasbord of goodies for a world sick to death of Israel’s nauseating wars. With all the grace of an overweight mob boss sticking a gun in the face of one of his would-be extortion victims, Netanyahu makes it clear in the interview he views the American president as his boy out to do the bidding of the Jewish state and little more.
According to Netanyahu, the “two great missions” facing President Obama are–(1) fixing the economy, and (2) that he “must” stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and “quickly”. As if he were a cub scout den leader telling scary stories to a group of boys seated around a campfire he theatricizes the urgency of it all by saying “You don’t want a messianic, apocalyptic cult controlling atomic bombs…When the wide-eyed believer gets hold of the reins of power and the weapons of mass death, then the entire world should start worrying, and that is what is happening in Iran.” He then went one step further in saying the Iranian nuclear challenge represents a “hinge of history” and that Western civilization “will have failed” if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons.
P.S. Read the rest of the source article [here] to read alarming news, that should be obvious to Americans, if they were informed by "their" media instead of jingoed and manipulated. Read the inciteful comments to the article. Don't miss the comments of Jewish supremacist Ruth Bernstein. Her comments are exemplary of Jewish supremacism.
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…We have the capability to take the world down with us, and I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” – Martin Van Creveld, Israeli Historian
In early February 2009, a mere few days before the elections in Israel that delivered into Benjamin Netanyahu’s hands the launch codes to several hundred nuclear weapons aimed at every major capital in the Western world, former U.S. Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller predicted that upon assuming the seat of power Netanyahu’s first priority would be “strategic conversation” with America’s new president, Barack Obama. Miller further predicted that the aim of this “very serious” conversation would be to “scare the daylights out of the president”, the ultimate objective of which would be mobilizing–not only the United States, but indeed the entire “international community”–into addressing the Iranian situation in a manner deemed “acceptable” to the Jewish state and her agenda.
Now, almost as if Miller were some wizard with a magic crystal ball, indeed Netanyahu (the same former Israeli commando-turned politician who gloated over the deaths of 3,000 Americans on 9/11 saying the event was “good” because it would generate “immediate sympathy” for Israel) has made good on the former diplomat’s predictions and delivered his threats, and not only to America but as well to the entire Western world. Rather than do it face to face with the US President however, he chose instead to use his own personal emissary, none other than writer Jeffrey Goldberg, pro-Zionist fanatic, propagandist, de-facto disinformation agent for a foreign power and more-than-willing accomplice to Israel’s war crimes, both in the Middle East and beyond.
Appearing in last month’s Atlantic magazine, Goldberg’s piece entitled “Netanyahu to Obama: Stop Iran—Or I Will” features newly-made capo di tutti capi “Bibi” dishing up a whole smorgasbord of goodies for a world sick to death of Israel’s nauseating wars. With all the grace of an overweight mob boss sticking a gun in the face of one of his would-be extortion victims, Netanyahu makes it clear in the interview he views the American president as his boy out to do the bidding of the Jewish state and little more.
According to Netanyahu, the “two great missions” facing President Obama are–(1) fixing the economy, and (2) that he “must” stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and “quickly”. As if he were a cub scout den leader telling scary stories to a group of boys seated around a campfire he theatricizes the urgency of it all by saying “You don’t want a messianic, apocalyptic cult controlling atomic bombs…When the wide-eyed believer gets hold of the reins of power and the weapons of mass death, then the entire world should start worrying, and that is what is happening in Iran.” He then went one step further in saying the Iranian nuclear challenge represents a “hinge of history” and that Western civilization “will have failed” if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons.
P.S. Read the rest of the source article [here] to read alarming news, that should be obvious to Americans, if they were informed by "their" media instead of jingoed and manipulated. Read the inciteful comments to the article. Don't miss the comments of Jewish supremacist Ruth Bernstein. Her comments are exemplary of Jewish supremacism.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Debunking Glenn Beck
It really isn't necessary to debunk Glenn Beck, right? But then again, a lot of people still think the world of "The Decider".
Monday, April 6, 2009
Gazans Deliver Video Message to Americans
Unfortunately for these Gazans, talking to Americans about justice, human rights and controlling their government is like talking to the wall.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Cats and Arabs and the USS Liberty
Cats and Arabs and the USS Liberty... and Disgusting Jewish Supremacism
1. Obadiah Shoher is the pen name of a “veteran politician” who left the USSR for Israel. He has a website called Sampson Blinded which expresses in very clear prose the bigoted notions we see in the likes of those such as Judea Pearl who is hard at work, as is Abe Foxman, trying to establish the claim that to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Semitic.
Why did Shoher name his blog (and a book he authored) “Sampson Blinded?” Biblical Samson, blinded by the Philistines, killed thousands of them in (a) suicide attack. Israeli nuclear weapons are aptly called the Samson Option.
How lovely. At least we know now who it was who invented suicide missions in the region.
Mr. Shoher does not think that Jews should just engage in suicide attacks. Rather, he believes they should be much more on the offensive. Among the tactics he endorses is the murder of POWs. He acknowledges that Israel has killed ” a lot” of Arab POW’s and he approves. Red text below is my emphasis.
Jews need not be perfect, but rather normal, and that includes committing normal atrocities. Yes, we did attack some UN buildings, and have no qualms about that. Even more, in many areas IDF soldiers received an order to shoot at everything that moves, cats and Arabs included. Still more, when IDF was the IDF, we used to kill POWs, and a lot of them. Not some right-wingers, because the commanders were all leftists, but mainstream Jewish soldiers killed scores of Syrian and Egyptians POWs. I can justify the killing on religious grounds or by necessity, but that would be superfluous. Yes, we killed POWs like every other nation did, including Americans, Canadians, and Australians. The Egyptians screamed after a silly Israeli movie showed IDF massacring their POWs, and Israeli establishment wrung their hands that that is just a movie, a fantasy. Now, there is no fantasy in my words: we indeed killed a lot of Egyptian POWs, especially in 1967, less in 1973.
I have no problem with that.
Gee, I’m really seeing now the pearls of wisdom in Judea Pearl’s assertion that to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Semitic. It’s nice to see that Shoher can justify murder on “religious grounds.” In main-stream-media-speak when talking of things Judaic this kind of attitude is called “ultra-nationalism.” I’m sure some of you might be able to come up with more accurate appellations. The above quote, btw, is from his post called “The Jewish Way of War” though the headline on the post is a less utlra-nationalistic phrase: “War, Our Style.”
Elsewhere he tells us: There is no reason to be Jewish other than being religious.
And we also learn that Jews are better than the rest of us.
Why take on the Jewish nationalism rather than any other? Because Jews are smarter, more ethical than any other nation. But most importantly - because Jews are different. Many people just want to be different from those around them, and Jewishness is a scientific theory which establishes such difference. I, for one, never felt any attachment to the Christian crowds around me.
2. Phil Tourney is one of the countless victims of people who think exactly like Obadiah Shoher and Judea Pearl. Phil is a USS Liberty survivor who about a year ago decided he had had enough and decided to call Israel out on the carpet for its brutal attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 which resulted in the deaths of 34 American sailors and the wounding of over 170 more. Phil has a weekly two-hour radio show on RBN that runs each Saturday morning from 10am to noon Central Time. The show is dedicated to the sailors on that ship. You can listen live on the Internet and, if you pay the whopping sum of $1.33 a month, you can download past shows from the archives.
Below is an excerpt of Phil on a rant during part of last week’s show. Worth listening to for the honest, heart-felt quality of his discourse.
Listen to Phil here.
Source article is here.
P.S. After learning all that I've learned about Zionism, Judeaism and Jews since 9/11/2001, I thank God I was not born Jewish. That culture is such a deep pit --and ever deepening-- to climb out of. I sure am glad I don't have their karma... and I pray for justice. Does that make me “anti-Semitic”?… the question is rhetorical.
1. Obadiah Shoher is the pen name of a “veteran politician” who left the USSR for Israel. He has a website called Sampson Blinded which expresses in very clear prose the bigoted notions we see in the likes of those such as Judea Pearl who is hard at work, as is Abe Foxman, trying to establish the claim that to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Semitic.
Why did Shoher name his blog (and a book he authored) “Sampson Blinded?” Biblical Samson, blinded by the Philistines, killed thousands of them in (a) suicide attack. Israeli nuclear weapons are aptly called the Samson Option.
How lovely. At least we know now who it was who invented suicide missions in the region.
Mr. Shoher does not think that Jews should just engage in suicide attacks. Rather, he believes they should be much more on the offensive. Among the tactics he endorses is the murder of POWs. He acknowledges that Israel has killed ” a lot” of Arab POW’s and he approves. Red text below is my emphasis.
Jews need not be perfect, but rather normal, and that includes committing normal atrocities. Yes, we did attack some UN buildings, and have no qualms about that. Even more, in many areas IDF soldiers received an order to shoot at everything that moves, cats and Arabs included. Still more, when IDF was the IDF, we used to kill POWs, and a lot of them. Not some right-wingers, because the commanders were all leftists, but mainstream Jewish soldiers killed scores of Syrian and Egyptians POWs. I can justify the killing on religious grounds or by necessity, but that would be superfluous. Yes, we killed POWs like every other nation did, including Americans, Canadians, and Australians. The Egyptians screamed after a silly Israeli movie showed IDF massacring their POWs, and Israeli establishment wrung their hands that that is just a movie, a fantasy. Now, there is no fantasy in my words: we indeed killed a lot of Egyptian POWs, especially in 1967, less in 1973.
I have no problem with that.
Gee, I’m really seeing now the pearls of wisdom in Judea Pearl’s assertion that to be anti-Zionist is to be anti-Semitic. It’s nice to see that Shoher can justify murder on “religious grounds.” In main-stream-media-speak when talking of things Judaic this kind of attitude is called “ultra-nationalism.” I’m sure some of you might be able to come up with more accurate appellations. The above quote, btw, is from his post called “The Jewish Way of War” though the headline on the post is a less utlra-nationalistic phrase: “War, Our Style.”
Elsewhere he tells us: There is no reason to be Jewish other than being religious.
And we also learn that Jews are better than the rest of us.
Why take on the Jewish nationalism rather than any other? Because Jews are smarter, more ethical than any other nation. But most importantly - because Jews are different. Many people just want to be different from those around them, and Jewishness is a scientific theory which establishes such difference. I, for one, never felt any attachment to the Christian crowds around me.
2. Phil Tourney is one of the countless victims of people who think exactly like Obadiah Shoher and Judea Pearl. Phil is a USS Liberty survivor who about a year ago decided he had had enough and decided to call Israel out on the carpet for its brutal attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 which resulted in the deaths of 34 American sailors and the wounding of over 170 more. Phil has a weekly two-hour radio show on RBN that runs each Saturday morning from 10am to noon Central Time. The show is dedicated to the sailors on that ship. You can listen live on the Internet and, if you pay the whopping sum of $1.33 a month, you can download past shows from the archives.
Below is an excerpt of Phil on a rant during part of last week’s show. Worth listening to for the honest, heart-felt quality of his discourse.
Listen to Phil here.
Source article is here.
P.S. After learning all that I've learned about Zionism, Judeaism and Jews since 9/11/2001, I thank God I was not born Jewish. That culture is such a deep pit --and ever deepening-- to climb out of. I sure am glad I don't have their karma... and I pray for justice. Does that make me “anti-Semitic”?… the question is rhetorical.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Martin Luther King: Silence Is Betrayal
Why are you silent, Americans? Is it because you're so ashamed that you can't speak? Or is it because you're being silenced by your Jewish media who betray you by ignoring your protests... over 8 million people pouring into the streets the world over before the war... including millions here in America.
People poured out into the streets by a burden of morality from God. Thus it was in effect God speaking; God saying don't do this. And the Jewish media covered the world's eyes so it could lie and say this is a popular war. The Jewish media and powers show they are anti-God --anti-Christ-- by their going against what everyone in their heart of hearts knows is right and turning things upside down: occupation is freedom; torture is OK, etc, etc.
Americans, turn out your betrayers, the liars lying to you.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Why Is Judaism Counted Among The World's Great Religions?
Have any of you ever wondered why Judaism is counted among the worlds great religions? Christianity has over 2 billion subscribers, Islam about 1.5 and we secular non religious types number over a billion. Even the Sikhs, Juche and Spiritist's out number the subscribers to Judaism estimated at only 14 million. So how can Judaism even be mentioned among great religions? And what is a Jew anyway? Someone who subscribes to Judaism or is it an ethnic identity? These folks whoever or whatever they are represent zero percent of the worlds population (rounded). Why are we wasting our time talking about this?
Lets take a look at Judaism's most important belief. Fundamental to Judaism is the belief that the people of Israel are God’s chosen people, who must serve as a light for other nations. First of all, what sort of omnipotent god would choose one ethnic group among we who have descended from monkeys over all others. Why would God in all of his or her perfection show this sort of bias. It seems to me a perfect god would be impartial. I submit to you there must have been an error on the part of the scribe taking God's dictation. Secondly how could anyone look at the modern Jewish State of Apartheid Israel and think it was a light upon anything.
But here God would seem to have an omnipotence problem. What happened to those whom God delivered his or her original message. Most are now subscribers to the faith of Islam calling themselves Palestinians. Surely God knew that those now calling themselves Jews in Apartheid Israel and elsewhere were more likely descended from Genghis Khan than Jesus(which may explain this overly aggressive behavior on the part of some). The Khasarians converted to Judaism almost a thousand years ago by order of their king long after God is purported to have delivered this message. Doesn't it seem logical that those calling themselves Jews today more likely descended from the Khazar's than the ancient Israelites. Especially when their ancestors came from Russia and Poland(most of them) which of course was much closer to the Kingdom of Khasaria. If so they are completely unrelated to the ancient Israelites that God thought were so special. Many of the original Zionist founders of modern Apartheid Israel were well aware of their true ancestry.
But even if these people are not the special people the God of the Old Testament spoke, one cannot deny that they are truly unique. Wherever they go and no matter how small their numbers they seem to rise to unprecedented levels of power, wealth and influence. Through acquisition and control of the media in many of their host countries, they have been successful in convincing most of you that if you notice these patterns, you yourself are anti-Semitic, notwithstanding the fact that they themselves were not actually Semites. Who else could pull something like this off.
But in our recent history where have many of these highly motivated practitioners of Judaism led us? In the old Soviet Union almost half of it's early leadership were Jewish. Many of these Bolsheviks were responsible for turning what could have been a noble experiment into one of the most murderous enterprises in modern history. Like Genrikh Yagoda, one of the most dastardly Homo-Sapiens of all time, a Jew. But don't expect to read about Yagoda in our history books. His Jewishness could never get past the gatekeepers.
Then there is Apartheid Israel where many of the former Jewish Bolsheviks had to skedaddle after even Joe Stalin got tired of their murderousness. Many a Rabbi have stated that these men stopped being Jews when they became murderous Bolsheviks. Apparently they became Jews again however when their murderous talents were required in Palestine. After sixty years of savagery against God's real chosen people(God, why have you forsaken them) the Jews are now in the majority. Apparently in States where Jews dominate if you are not a Jew, you are a second class of citizen without the full rights of citizenship in the Jewish State. If you happen to be in a Zionist occupied territory, you are without any basic human rights. Your land can be stolen or you can be murdered at will. And if anyone in any way criticises these circumstances they are of course anti-Semites.
But none of this hideous behavior would have been possible without the support of many subscribers to Judaism right here in America. How is this possible? For those paying attention it is not hard to figure out. In the Six Day War in 1967 (Israeli land theft-phase II), for example, when an American ship, the Liberty was intentionally attacked by Israel resulting in the deaths of many American Sailors, the dark hand of the Zionist Lobby sprang into action in order to cover up this murderous assault. Even just a few years ago when a Government commission made available the details of what really happened, not one media outlet was there to cover the story. And this of course is how it works. Many of these folks have become so entrenched in our Government, our major corporations, our educational institutions, our trades and professions and of course our media that they have the ability to shape our perceptions of reality for their own purposes and Zionist political objectives. They have amassed wealth and political power far out of proportion with their numbers. They can even convince us that they are the oppressed even when they are the oppressors. And of course they can convince us that Judaism is one of the worlds great religions, even when their major underlying belief is completely fraudulent.
Will we in the future continue to believe we live in the land of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and other great patriots, or will be convinced that we live in the land of Theodore Herzl? I'm no longer sure. Only time will tell.
Source article is here.
P.S. Why is Judaism counted among the world's great religions? Good question. Since 9/11, since I've been looking at it, I don't see anything positive about it. Could the reason that it's counted among the world's great religions have anything to do with why things seem upside down, i.e., invading, destroying and occupying a country is considered liberating it... and truth is such a rare commodity?
Lets take a look at Judaism's most important belief. Fundamental to Judaism is the belief that the people of Israel are God’s chosen people, who must serve as a light for other nations. First of all, what sort of omnipotent god would choose one ethnic group among we who have descended from monkeys over all others. Why would God in all of his or her perfection show this sort of bias. It seems to me a perfect god would be impartial. I submit to you there must have been an error on the part of the scribe taking God's dictation. Secondly how could anyone look at the modern Jewish State of Apartheid Israel and think it was a light upon anything.
But here God would seem to have an omnipotence problem. What happened to those whom God delivered his or her original message. Most are now subscribers to the faith of Islam calling themselves Palestinians. Surely God knew that those now calling themselves Jews in Apartheid Israel and elsewhere were more likely descended from Genghis Khan than Jesus(which may explain this overly aggressive behavior on the part of some). The Khasarians converted to Judaism almost a thousand years ago by order of their king long after God is purported to have delivered this message. Doesn't it seem logical that those calling themselves Jews today more likely descended from the Khazar's than the ancient Israelites. Especially when their ancestors came from Russia and Poland(most of them) which of course was much closer to the Kingdom of Khasaria. If so they are completely unrelated to the ancient Israelites that God thought were so special. Many of the original Zionist founders of modern Apartheid Israel were well aware of their true ancestry.
But even if these people are not the special people the God of the Old Testament spoke, one cannot deny that they are truly unique. Wherever they go and no matter how small their numbers they seem to rise to unprecedented levels of power, wealth and influence. Through acquisition and control of the media in many of their host countries, they have been successful in convincing most of you that if you notice these patterns, you yourself are anti-Semitic, notwithstanding the fact that they themselves were not actually Semites. Who else could pull something like this off.
But in our recent history where have many of these highly motivated practitioners of Judaism led us? In the old Soviet Union almost half of it's early leadership were Jewish. Many of these Bolsheviks were responsible for turning what could have been a noble experiment into one of the most murderous enterprises in modern history. Like Genrikh Yagoda, one of the most dastardly Homo-Sapiens of all time, a Jew. But don't expect to read about Yagoda in our history books. His Jewishness could never get past the gatekeepers.
Then there is Apartheid Israel where many of the former Jewish Bolsheviks had to skedaddle after even Joe Stalin got tired of their murderousness. Many a Rabbi have stated that these men stopped being Jews when they became murderous Bolsheviks. Apparently they became Jews again however when their murderous talents were required in Palestine. After sixty years of savagery against God's real chosen people(God, why have you forsaken them) the Jews are now in the majority. Apparently in States where Jews dominate if you are not a Jew, you are a second class of citizen without the full rights of citizenship in the Jewish State. If you happen to be in a Zionist occupied territory, you are without any basic human rights. Your land can be stolen or you can be murdered at will. And if anyone in any way criticises these circumstances they are of course anti-Semites.
But none of this hideous behavior would have been possible without the support of many subscribers to Judaism right here in America. How is this possible? For those paying attention it is not hard to figure out. In the Six Day War in 1967 (Israeli land theft-phase II), for example, when an American ship, the Liberty was intentionally attacked by Israel resulting in the deaths of many American Sailors, the dark hand of the Zionist Lobby sprang into action in order to cover up this murderous assault. Even just a few years ago when a Government commission made available the details of what really happened, not one media outlet was there to cover the story. And this of course is how it works. Many of these folks have become so entrenched in our Government, our major corporations, our educational institutions, our trades and professions and of course our media that they have the ability to shape our perceptions of reality for their own purposes and Zionist political objectives. They have amassed wealth and political power far out of proportion with their numbers. They can even convince us that they are the oppressed even when they are the oppressors. And of course they can convince us that Judaism is one of the worlds great religions, even when their major underlying belief is completely fraudulent.
Will we in the future continue to believe we live in the land of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and other great patriots, or will be convinced that we live in the land of Theodore Herzl? I'm no longer sure. Only time will tell.
Source article is here.
P.S. Why is Judaism counted among the world's great religions? Good question. Since 9/11, since I've been looking at it, I don't see anything positive about it. Could the reason that it's counted among the world's great religions have anything to do with why things seem upside down, i.e., invading, destroying and occupying a country is considered liberating it... and truth is such a rare commodity?
John Yoo Arrested in Italy!
ROME (Reuters) - John C. Yoo, a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the United States, was arrested on Tuesday in Milan, Italy, and is being held for possible extradition to Spain, where he and five other retired officials who served under former President George W. Bush are expected to be indicted by a Spanish court for violations of the Geneva Conventions, the Convention Against Torture, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Yoo, 41, is a visiting professor of Law at the Chapman University School of Law in Orange County, California, on leave from the University of California Berkeley School of Law. He served in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice from 2001 to 2003. Yoo authored memos permitting the use of torture. Torture is banned by both U.S. law and international conventions.
Milan prosecutor Andrea Spolini released a statement indicating that Yoo can be held for up to 90 days awaiting an indictment in Spain under the international standard of "Rompi Testiculo.
Source article is here.
P.S. Could it be possible that the world is rightside up outside the United States?
Yoo, 41, is a visiting professor of Law at the Chapman University School of Law in Orange County, California, on leave from the University of California Berkeley School of Law. He served in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice from 2001 to 2003. Yoo authored memos permitting the use of torture. Torture is banned by both U.S. law and international conventions.
Milan prosecutor Andrea Spolini released a statement indicating that Yoo can be held for up to 90 days awaiting an indictment in Spain under the international standard of "Rompi Testiculo.
Source article is here.
P.S. Could it be possible that the world is rightside up outside the United States?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
