Mumbai is ablaze. This attack is huge. My guess is that over a hundred people are involved. All of the people in on this plot ran on a well laid out schedule. Whatever the f*** is going on has been well organised. And whatever it was the organisers intended to achieve, they've achieved it.
Sure enough, it's Muslims. Or so the media tells me. Apparently the terrorists are unhappy with the treatment of Muslims in India. Their plan, as best I can tell, is to kill Indians and foreigners indiscriminately, set fire to major pubic buildings, and take hostages and refuse to release them until Muslims are treated better. Good thinking. Am I alone in wondering at this disconnect?
Between me and the media, it sure looks like it. But it's early days yet. Me, I confidently look forward to the members of the media stating the obvious and saying, 'This doesn't make any sense at all. Who in their right mind would expect that a huge Muslim murder spree would improve the lot of Muslims? How will this achieve anything but having Hindus and Muslims at each other's throats? How would this be in the interest of Muslims?'
Just joking - those questions will never be asked. But if they were I imagine the answer would be that these people are not in their right mind. They're nuts. Nuts who can pull off a coordinated 100 man attack. When it comes to the 'how' they're rational, but on the subject of 'why', they are insane. Um, okay.
Sorry, but between the two prospects of madmen seeking one thing and achieving the obvious and inevitable opposite, and perfectly rational people seeking discord by way of lies and dupes, and succeeding admirably, I'm going to put my money on the latter.
The difference between me and the media is that I have a smattering of history. I know that in 1954 Israeli agents pretending to be Muslims blew up American targets in Cairo in the hopes of prompting the US to attack Egypt. They didn't succeed because the bombers were caught and spilled all the beans. I know that they did it again in 1967 when they attempted to sink the USS Liberty with the loss of all hands and blame it on the Egyptians. The nuke-laden skyhawks were already on their way to Cairo before LBJ and McNamara realised that the Israelis had failed to sink the most lightly armed boat in the US navy and called them back. Oops.
Clearly the Israelis decided that their previous lies had been too modest and on the 11th of September 2001, they attacked multiple US targets and killed 3000. Finally success! Christians and Muslims, at each other's throats. High fives all round. Confirmation indeed that they were precisely as great as they thought they were.
The media obviously doesn't do history. Not unless it's Nazis, that is. Anyway, who in the media has time for history? They can be barely keep up with the script on the autocue, never mind all that boring history stuff about who bombed who whilst pretending to be Muslims. As they say in the media - Don't think, just read the script! And are the words, 'false-flag', 'Israeli agents', or 'overpaid media whores' in the script? Of course not.
Nor should one ask who writes the script. Whoever they are, they're very clever. Without them how would we know that Muslims are irrational murderous motherf***ers who will kill us in spite of the fact that it will advance their interests in no way, shape, or form.
Bullshit!
source article
P.S. Those Muslim terrorists sure know how to pull off mind boggling terrorism events that serve Israel's interests. They're the quintessential bad guys.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Primer on Israeli House Demolitions
part 2 | part 3
P.S. According to one local prominent antiwar/middle eastern activist there is "good" zionism. According to another, after a period of time after being awakened to zionism I should no longer be outraged. Well it's been about five years since I've become aware of zionism and the plight of the Palestinians, and I still haven't seen any evidence of that "good" zionism, and it's awfully hard for me not to be outraged still. I must be wrong headed because these two individuals are embraced by the local Palestinian/Muslim community and I am shunned. So I'll no longer attempt to express solidarity with the local Palestinian/Muslim community or seek solidarity with them. I will however still attempt to raise consciousness to the evil of zionism.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Breaking FKN News: Mumbai Not a CIA/Mossad Job
And Zionists will stop short of WW3 for the cause of Jewish supremacy. And besides, the problem isn't Jewish supremacism, it's terrorism.
Zionists and Unrest in India
The vision of a majority of people of the Asian subcontinent of a united federation spanning from the eastern borders of Bangladesh to the western reaches of Pakistan and from the southern most tip of India to the northern most frontiers of Kashmir can be a reality: through cooperation, mutual respect, and shunning distrust of each other.
Each member state of the new federation will have maximum autonomy, and yet be part of a greater union whose member states are neither superior, nor inferior but equal to other members of the federation; unlike the present Indian system, where the federal government is perceived as being superior to the state governments.
For someone to accept a new idea, the questions that need to be asked are who benefits most and who is there to lose from this new prospect. Although, factually speaking, this really is not a novel idea; all these countries have been united as a single nation throughout much of history.
The people of Pakistan, Kashmir, Bangladesh, and each state of India will be the main benfeciaries.
The losers in this new federation will be the trouble makers who are responsible for causing unrest in India and Pakistan and continually prod the two countries to escalate tension between them. They are defnitely going to be the losers since they lose the monopoly on arms sales to both India and Pakistan. Dont beleive me? Check out the new 20 billion dollar arms sales that Israel recently signed with India. Just google it and you'll see what I am talking about. Israel has been a trouble maker since its inception and has no problem causing death and destruction in other coutries to further chances of its own survival.
For now, let's familiarize ourselves with a widely accepted definition of Zionism, about which I'll be talking about today: Zi·on·ism n. A Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century to occupy Palestinian lands, displace local arabs and establish a Jewish country. Modern Zionism is concerned with the support and survival of the state of Israel.
Israel sees India as its new 'minion' in the region, but little does it know that Indians are smarter, more tolerant and generally peaceful compared to their counterparts in appartheid-ridden Israel. Does anyone else see the conincidence that whenever India and Pakistan come close to having peace talks to normalise relations there is either a terrorist attack in India or some sort of attack in Pakistan.
See the "Tabut Gyadd" plying on the roads of kashmir. (For benefit of non-kashmiri readers, it literlly translates to "Coffin vehicle"). Anyways, these menacing looking bullet-proof Indian Army patrol vehicles were sold by Israel. There are thousands of them in Kashmir and each costs not less than half-a-million US dollars. Israel is laughing all the way to the bank and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that it relishes the thought of more death and destruction in Kashmir and will do everything in its power to escalate the hostilities between Kashmir, India and Pakistan. After all, for their sales pitch to the Indian government, they claim that these vehicles have been tried and tested on the Palestinian people and that these vehicles are perfect for suppressing a hostile people seeking independence.
How convenient it was for Israel. Until the insurgency started in Kashmir, India did not even recognise its existense- in solidarity with the Palestinian people. Thats right! there were no diplomatic relations between Israel and India until the kashmir insurgency started in 1989. You can call me a conspiracy theorist all you want but in 1989 Israel offered a hand to India to battle Kashmiri fighters and India gladly accepted and that was the start of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of arms sales from Israel to India.
A very simple analogy is of two members of a family, who live side by side, and are having a disagreement. And instead of counselling both to reach an agreement, an unscrupulous neighbour starts selling them rocks to throw at each other: Israel is that unscrupulous neighbour!
source more here and here
P.S. Oh yeah. When there's trouble, look for zionists. Think they'll stop short of WW3 pushing their cause of Jewish supremacism?
Each member state of the new federation will have maximum autonomy, and yet be part of a greater union whose member states are neither superior, nor inferior but equal to other members of the federation; unlike the present Indian system, where the federal government is perceived as being superior to the state governments.
For someone to accept a new idea, the questions that need to be asked are who benefits most and who is there to lose from this new prospect. Although, factually speaking, this really is not a novel idea; all these countries have been united as a single nation throughout much of history.
The people of Pakistan, Kashmir, Bangladesh, and each state of India will be the main benfeciaries.
The losers in this new federation will be the trouble makers who are responsible for causing unrest in India and Pakistan and continually prod the two countries to escalate tension between them. They are defnitely going to be the losers since they lose the monopoly on arms sales to both India and Pakistan. Dont beleive me? Check out the new 20 billion dollar arms sales that Israel recently signed with India. Just google it and you'll see what I am talking about. Israel has been a trouble maker since its inception and has no problem causing death and destruction in other coutries to further chances of its own survival.
For now, let's familiarize ourselves with a widely accepted definition of Zionism, about which I'll be talking about today: Zi·on·ism n. A Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century to occupy Palestinian lands, displace local arabs and establish a Jewish country. Modern Zionism is concerned with the support and survival of the state of Israel.
Israel sees India as its new 'minion' in the region, but little does it know that Indians are smarter, more tolerant and generally peaceful compared to their counterparts in appartheid-ridden Israel. Does anyone else see the conincidence that whenever India and Pakistan come close to having peace talks to normalise relations there is either a terrorist attack in India or some sort of attack in Pakistan.
See the "Tabut Gyadd" plying on the roads of kashmir. (For benefit of non-kashmiri readers, it literlly translates to "Coffin vehicle"). Anyways, these menacing looking bullet-proof Indian Army patrol vehicles were sold by Israel. There are thousands of them in Kashmir and each costs not less than half-a-million US dollars. Israel is laughing all the way to the bank and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that it relishes the thought of more death and destruction in Kashmir and will do everything in its power to escalate the hostilities between Kashmir, India and Pakistan. After all, for their sales pitch to the Indian government, they claim that these vehicles have been tried and tested on the Palestinian people and that these vehicles are perfect for suppressing a hostile people seeking independence.
How convenient it was for Israel. Until the insurgency started in Kashmir, India did not even recognise its existense- in solidarity with the Palestinian people. Thats right! there were no diplomatic relations between Israel and India until the kashmir insurgency started in 1989. You can call me a conspiracy theorist all you want but in 1989 Israel offered a hand to India to battle Kashmiri fighters and India gladly accepted and that was the start of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of arms sales from Israel to India.
A very simple analogy is of two members of a family, who live side by side, and are having a disagreement. And instead of counselling both to reach an agreement, an unscrupulous neighbour starts selling them rocks to throw at each other: Israel is that unscrupulous neighbour!
source more here and here
P.S. Oh yeah. When there's trouble, look for zionists. Think they'll stop short of WW3 pushing their cause of Jewish supremacism?
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Palestinian Village Fights For Survival
On Friday, 21 November, upwards of 500 people—Palestinians, Israelis and Internationals—marched toward the gate of the Wall in the West Bank Palestinian village of Jayyous, and within a few minutes the gate was open and in pieces.
The villagers were ecstatic at what had been accomplished, waving pieces of the gate in the air with smiles ear-to-ear.
Yet, when Israeli soldiers arrived on the scene, they responded by shooting live and rubber bullets at villagers and firing teargas canisters into the air. Five villagers were injured.
After the violence subsided, the soldiers took control of the village, imposed a curfew, and declared it a closed military zone.
Approximately one hour later, the soldiers detained five internationals as they attempted to leave the village in a car along with a number of Palestinians.
“This was a clear message to internationals that they will pay for being present at these demonstrations” said one of the internationals. “The Israeli authorities do not want us here so that they can do what they want with the Palestinians.”
Jayyous was the first village to engage in regular nonviolent protests against the Wall six years ago this month. The situation was so bad for Jayyous that the municipality actually managed to get their case heard at the Israeli High Court.
After years of debate and legal charades, the Court finally ruled on 4 November that the Wall should be moved back by two kilometers.
While sounding like a positive development, the decision will actually make things worse for this small farming community.
Prior to the decision, Jayyous villagers were able to cross the Wall through a gate twice per day to access their olive and citrus groves on the other side of the Wall. Now, the gate will permanently be shut, leaving plenty of space for the expansion of Zufit settlement and the development of an Israeli industrial zone.
The High Court decision is notably in direct contradiction with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 2004, which states that the Wall is illegal in international law, that farmers should be compensated, and that all settlers should be repatriated to the other side of the Green Line.
In all, 5,585 dunam of land will be confiscated from Jayyous once construction of the new Wall is complete, leaving the majority of Jayyous’ farmers stripped of their livelihoods and unemployed.
Given these circumstances, it is certain that the villagers of Jayyous will continue to protest against the Wall, despite the recent High Court decision.
And, as in other villages adversely affected by the Wall, internationals will continue to maintain their presence, despite the arrests and intimidations.
source artice with video
P.S. As long as there is any human decency, there will be resistance to Zionism: Jewish apartheid, Jewish supremacism.
The villagers were ecstatic at what had been accomplished, waving pieces of the gate in the air with smiles ear-to-ear.
Yet, when Israeli soldiers arrived on the scene, they responded by shooting live and rubber bullets at villagers and firing teargas canisters into the air. Five villagers were injured.
After the violence subsided, the soldiers took control of the village, imposed a curfew, and declared it a closed military zone.
Approximately one hour later, the soldiers detained five internationals as they attempted to leave the village in a car along with a number of Palestinians.
“This was a clear message to internationals that they will pay for being present at these demonstrations” said one of the internationals. “The Israeli authorities do not want us here so that they can do what they want with the Palestinians.”
Jayyous was the first village to engage in regular nonviolent protests against the Wall six years ago this month. The situation was so bad for Jayyous that the municipality actually managed to get their case heard at the Israeli High Court.
After years of debate and legal charades, the Court finally ruled on 4 November that the Wall should be moved back by two kilometers.
While sounding like a positive development, the decision will actually make things worse for this small farming community.
Prior to the decision, Jayyous villagers were able to cross the Wall through a gate twice per day to access their olive and citrus groves on the other side of the Wall. Now, the gate will permanently be shut, leaving plenty of space for the expansion of Zufit settlement and the development of an Israeli industrial zone.
The High Court decision is notably in direct contradiction with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 2004, which states that the Wall is illegal in international law, that farmers should be compensated, and that all settlers should be repatriated to the other side of the Green Line.
In all, 5,585 dunam of land will be confiscated from Jayyous once construction of the new Wall is complete, leaving the majority of Jayyous’ farmers stripped of their livelihoods and unemployed.
Given these circumstances, it is certain that the villagers of Jayyous will continue to protest against the Wall, despite the recent High Court decision.
And, as in other villages adversely affected by the Wall, internationals will continue to maintain their presence, despite the arrests and intimidations.
source artice with video
P.S. As long as there is any human decency, there will be resistance to Zionism: Jewish apartheid, Jewish supremacism.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist, The "War on Terror" is Fake.
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist is a new documentary from The Corbett Report that interrogates the mythology of Al Qaeda as a shadowy terrorist organization led by arch-villain Osama Bin Laden. The film will look at the group's founding and funding by American intelligence, the Al Qaeda agents who are harboured and protected by foreign governments, the 9/11 myth and the fake videos that have been released in order to propagate the Al Qaeda myth. The documentary will also look at the reasons behind the creation of this phoney enemy and what the average citizen can do to work against the propaganda of the controlled corporate media.
P.S. Anyone with functioning brain matter between their ears knows that the "war on terror" is fake, and that 9-11 was an inside job.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Apartheid in Palestine
Friday, November 21, 2008
Irrefutably 9-11 Was An Inside Job
Why is the mainstream press avoiding the truth about 9-11? If you're avoiding and denying the truth about 9-11, why are you? And if you are, what/who is that helping?
Thursday, November 20, 2008
I would have killed her even if she was three years old.
An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.
The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.
Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah's hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.
On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that's mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."
A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".
source article
P.S. It may be difficult for those non-indoctrinated in the culture to understand the self-chosenites' ethics. We'll just have to accept things until we understand.
The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.
Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah's hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.
On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that's mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."
A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".
source article
P.S. It may be difficult for those non-indoctrinated in the culture to understand the self-chosenites' ethics. We'll just have to accept things until we understand.
Israel-Firsters: The Greatest Danger
Special thanks to kosher anti-war organizations for not bringing up Israel or the Isael-firsters, the real war mongers, in your protests. We probably couldn't continue the "war on terror" without your cooperation. The people might be up in arms to stop it otherwise.
The Lonely Decider
Googling "Bush" and "Bully" together brings up over two million references. I wonder how many references would come up for "Bush" with "Dummy" or "Stupid" or "Nitwit."
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Israeli Air Force Ready To Attack Iran
Israeli Air Force says it is ready to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. Israeli Air Force Commander General Ido Nehushtan claims his forces are ready to follow any order to thwart Iran's nuclear programs.
"The IAF is a very robust and flexible force … ready to do whatever is demanded," Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel on Tuesday.
He added, however, a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities "is a political decision" and has nothing to do with Israel's military capabilities.
The Nehushtan interview coincides with recent remarks by former Israeli military general, Moshe Ya'alon, who said that Israeli armed forces have the 'right capabilities' to launch a successful strike against Iran.
Ya'alon also revealed the wider ambitions of the Israeli regime aimed at toppling the Iranian government.
"[A strike] is not the end of the game. Then, we should follow it up with a viable, sustainable military operation to target the facilities [serving] the regime's interests, and not allow the regime to rehabilitate itself."
The threats against Iran's nuclear program conflict with the latest report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, which revealed that its inspectors have not found any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
source article
P.S. Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Is it World War Three yet?
"The IAF is a very robust and flexible force … ready to do whatever is demanded," Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel on Tuesday.
He added, however, a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities "is a political decision" and has nothing to do with Israel's military capabilities.
The Nehushtan interview coincides with recent remarks by former Israeli military general, Moshe Ya'alon, who said that Israeli armed forces have the 'right capabilities' to launch a successful strike against Iran.
Ya'alon also revealed the wider ambitions of the Israeli regime aimed at toppling the Iranian government.
"[A strike] is not the end of the game. Then, we should follow it up with a viable, sustainable military operation to target the facilities [serving] the regime's interests, and not allow the regime to rehabilitate itself."
The threats against Iran's nuclear program conflict with the latest report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, which revealed that its inspectors have not found any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
source article
P.S. Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Is it World War Three yet?
ZOA, Israeli Rabbis Ask for Pollard Pardon
The Zionist Organization of America and 200 Israeli chief rabbis asked President Bush to pardon Jonathan Pollard.
Requests to pardon the former U.S. Navy analyst, sentenced in 1987 to life for spying for Israel, are routine, but these pleas come as Bush prepares to leave office at a record low popularity – a condition that has paradoxically in the past freed presidents to make unpopular pardons.
Bush’s father, for instance, pardoned officials in his administration allegedly involved in the illegal arms—for-hostages deal with Iran after his defeat to President Clinton in 1992.
In its letter, the ZOA emphasized the relative harshness of the sentence – life for passing information to an ally, comparable to sentences for Cold War spies whose betrayals led to the deaths of Americans.
"The on-going imprisonment of Jonathan Pollard is unnecessary, unjust, disproportionate and inexplicable in terms of protecting the national interest," the ZOA said. "We respectfully appeal to you to put an end to what is now an inequitable term of imprisonment and pardon Jonathan Pollard."
Separately, Israel’s Sephardi and Ashkenazi chief rabbis rallied around 200 regional and municipal chief rabbis to sign a pardon request. "Jonathan Pollard is currently serving his 23rd year in prison," the letter said. "He is ill and his condition is serious. We respectfully request that you act mercifully towards him. Please grant him clemency as a humanitarian gesture to the Jewish People and the State of Israel."
source article
P.S. And besides, the USA is Israel and Israel is the USA. We are all Israelis.
Requests to pardon the former U.S. Navy analyst, sentenced in 1987 to life for spying for Israel, are routine, but these pleas come as Bush prepares to leave office at a record low popularity – a condition that has paradoxically in the past freed presidents to make unpopular pardons.
Bush’s father, for instance, pardoned officials in his administration allegedly involved in the illegal arms—for-hostages deal with Iran after his defeat to President Clinton in 1992.
In its letter, the ZOA emphasized the relative harshness of the sentence – life for passing information to an ally, comparable to sentences for Cold War spies whose betrayals led to the deaths of Americans.
"The on-going imprisonment of Jonathan Pollard is unnecessary, unjust, disproportionate and inexplicable in terms of protecting the national interest," the ZOA said. "We respectfully appeal to you to put an end to what is now an inequitable term of imprisonment and pardon Jonathan Pollard."
Separately, Israel’s Sephardi and Ashkenazi chief rabbis rallied around 200 regional and municipal chief rabbis to sign a pardon request. "Jonathan Pollard is currently serving his 23rd year in prison," the letter said. "He is ill and his condition is serious. We respectfully request that you act mercifully towards him. Please grant him clemency as a humanitarian gesture to the Jewish People and the State of Israel."
source article
P.S. And besides, the USA is Israel and Israel is the USA. We are all Israelis.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Howard Zinn: Whether 9-11 was an inside job, is irrelevant.
This is a perfect example of the incredible Jewish logic that has gentiles pulling out their hair trying to accommodate. This is how you get zionism (Jewish apartheid) being "beside the point." This doesn't make sense folks. We are having this illogic forced down our throats. It's insane logic. And it's criminal. And it's being done for, by and in behalf of criminals, no matter how nice they're comming off.
Monday, November 17, 2008
USS Liberty: Shameful, Cowardly Coverup
We in America really are afraid of the Jews. How else can you explain the zipped lips about the USS Liberty? Until we're not afraid to say "Jew" outloud in this country, we won't be free of their tyranny. Sorry if that sounds offensive, but that's just the way it is. If you realize the extent of that tyranny and all that it encompasses, then you'd realize that I needn't apologize. But unfortunately, most Americans are blind to that tyranny. It's so pervasive, it's like we drink it in our drinking water. In fact, we do.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
US/Israeli Home Foreclosures
Israeli homeowners don't appear to be the crosshairs of their financial institutions like millions are in America.Maybe Uncle Sam can stop those yearly welfare checks sent to Israel [for home subsidies], and in a show of appreciation for all the support America has given that racist and apartheid nation, Israel will now start repaying back some of those trillions of dollars we've gave them.
Most of these homes [for which we send welfare checks] are NOT in Israel; they are for Israelis moving into settlements on Palestinian land under a land acquisition program considered illegal by every civilized western nation, except ours. So while your friend and neighbor is packing up, or while the little old couple’s house down the street sits vacant, I want you to know what your tax dollars are paying for. They’re paying for the eviction of a carpenter or a fisherman in Palestine. A family that has never raised a hand in anger toward us or Israel for that matter. Your tax dollars ultimately pay for the bulldozers that knock down their home and for the Israeli carpenters who build another on the land. Another home to hand over to a "settler" family for next to nothing so that Israel can get a deeper hold on another nation’s land. They build these illegal settlements on hillsides and they put up Israeli flags and they deem, under no rule of international law, that the land is then the sovereign soil of Israel. Even their outgoing Prime Minister has stated that this practice is wrong and must stop.
source article
P.S. National healthcare for US citizens? Sure, after we fullfil our welfare commitments to apartheid Israel. Or hey, you could become Jewish and start a new life in Israel. Then you could live in government subsidized housing and have healthcare.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Dershowitz: I helped keep Carter silent.
Why didn't Jimmy Carter speak from the podium at the Democratic National Convention? Alan Dershowitz said he had something to do with it.
In an interview with Shalom TV, the Harvard Law School professor says he "pushed" Barack Obama "very hard to make that decision," Dershowitz said in an interview with Shalom TV. "Barack Obama had to make a choice between his Jewish supporters and his anti-Israel supporters like Jimmy Carter, and he did not choose Jimmy Carter. And that was an embarrassment for Jimmy Carter and a show of disrespect."
"It was a good decision, a wise decision, a moral decision," Dershowitz added.
Carter did appear in the convention hall after a video of the former prersident helping with Katrina relief was shown at the Denver gathering. But he did not make any remarks from the podium.
In the interview, Dershowitz also said he believes that Obama's support in the pro-Palestinian community could make it easier to advance the peace process.
"The fact that there are some in the pro-Palestinian community who like him may be a positive thing -- that he can reach out to both communities and be an honest broker who, without compromising Israel's security, can facilitate a kind of peace that will be both in the best interests of Israel and the best interests of the Palestinian people," Dershowitz said. "I have a high level of confidence, not perfect confidence but a high level of confidence, that he will do the right thing."
source article
P.S. It's a good thing Obama made the right decision. He must keep making the right decision, or he may wind up like JFK.
In an interview with Shalom TV, the Harvard Law School professor says he "pushed" Barack Obama "very hard to make that decision," Dershowitz said in an interview with Shalom TV. "Barack Obama had to make a choice between his Jewish supporters and his anti-Israel supporters like Jimmy Carter, and he did not choose Jimmy Carter. And that was an embarrassment for Jimmy Carter and a show of disrespect."
"It was a good decision, a wise decision, a moral decision," Dershowitz added.
Carter did appear in the convention hall after a video of the former prersident helping with Katrina relief was shown at the Denver gathering. But he did not make any remarks from the podium.
In the interview, Dershowitz also said he believes that Obama's support in the pro-Palestinian community could make it easier to advance the peace process.
"The fact that there are some in the pro-Palestinian community who like him may be a positive thing -- that he can reach out to both communities and be an honest broker who, without compromising Israel's security, can facilitate a kind of peace that will be both in the best interests of Israel and the best interests of the Palestinian people," Dershowitz said. "I have a high level of confidence, not perfect confidence but a high level of confidence, that he will do the right thing."
source article
P.S. It's a good thing Obama made the right decision. He must keep making the right decision, or he may wind up like JFK.
Friday, November 14, 2008
The War On Terror Is a Resounding Success
The war on terror is a resounding success. We've had no terrorist attacks here since 9-11, that day when the evil terrorists knew that the laws of physics would relax and just mere fires would cause buildings to collapse at free-fall speed into a cloud of dust into their own foot prints, which on any other day would've been the path of most resistance. (Good thing only three buildings caught fire that day.) Also since 9-11, because of our increased security, and the fact that we're keeping terrorists on the run throughout the world, we've kept the sun safe to rise every day.
A big shoutout to the anti-war protestors: thank you so much for not mentioning zionism in your protests... a special shoutout to Peace Action Milwaukee for this. We know you had one troublesome protestor. We shouldn't be disparaging our best friend in the Middle East. 9-11 just proved that Israel's enemies are also America's enemies. We have the same enemies! They hate us for our freedoms. Some people just hate democracy and freedom. We just have to talk to them. No war. We have to talk to them and convince them that democracy and freedom are good. If they'd all have a democracy like Israel, they could be our friends too. Oh, and if they want to have a good democracy they shouldn't entertain crazy 9-11 conspiracy theories or question the holocaust. And of course, stop all that talk about Israel being Jewish apartheid. Besides, it's Jewish apartheid, which is a good thing, which you'd understand if you read the Talmud.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Warning to America from a Former Hitler Youth
Because it has abandoned moral absolutes and its historic Christian faith, the U.S. is moving closer to a Nazi-style totalitarianism, warns a former German member of the Hitler Youth in a new book.
"Every day brings this nation closer to a Nazi-style totalitarian abyss," writes Hilmar von Campe, now a U.S. citizen, and author of "Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America."
"I lived the Nazi nightmare, and, as the old saying goes, 'A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument,'" writes von Campe. "Everything I write is based on my personal experience in Nazi Germany. There is nothing theoretical about my description of what happens when a nation throws God out of government and society, and Christians become religious bystanders. I don't want to see a repetition. The role of God in human society is the decisive issue for this generation. My writing is part of my life of restitution for the crimes of a godless government, of the evil of which I was a part."
Von Campe grew up under the Nazis, served in the Hitler Youth and fought against the Red Army in the Yugoslavian theater as a tank gunner in the German army. He was captured at the end of the war and escaped five months later from a prisoner of war camp in Communist Yugoslavia.
"It took me a long time to understand and define the nature of National Socialism," says von Campe. "And, unfortunately, their philosophy continues to flourish under different labels remaining a menace to America and free human society."
He writes: "The most painful part of defining National Socialism was to recognize my own moral responsibility for the Nazi disaster and their crimes against humanity. It boiled down to accepting the truth that 'as I am, so is my nation,' and realizing that if every German was like me, it was no wonder that the nation became a cesspool of gangsters. This realization is as valid today for any person in any nation as it was then, and it is true for America and every American now."
Von Campe's message is that political freedom and democratic rules alone are not sufficient to govern humanity justly.
"Democratic procedures can be subverted and dishonest politicians are like sand in the gearbox, abundant, everywhere and destructive," he writes. "What I see in America today is people painting their cabins while the ship goes down. Today in America we are witnessing a repeat performance of the tragedy of 1933 when an entire nation let itself be led like a lamb to the Socialist slaughterhouse. This time, the end of freedom is inevitable unless America rises to her mission and destiny."
Von Campe says he sees spiritual parallels among Americans and his childhood Germany.
"The silence from our pulpits regarding the moral collapse of American society from within is not very different from the silence that echoed from the pulpits in Germany toward Nazi policies," he explains. "Our family lived through the Nazi years in Germany, an experience typical of millions of Europeans regardless of what side they were on. We paid a high price for the moral perversions of a German government, which excluded God and His Commandments from their policies. America must not continue following the same path to destruction, but instead heed the lessons of history and the warning I am giving."
Specifically, von Campe warns Americans their political leaders are on the wrong footing, "denying our cultural and traditional roots based on our unique Constitution and Christian orientation as a nation. Christians don't understand their mission."
source article
P.S. That's "Christian" orientation. Not "Judeo-Christian." And definitely not anti-Christ "Jewish."
"Every day brings this nation closer to a Nazi-style totalitarian abyss," writes Hilmar von Campe, now a U.S. citizen, and author of "Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America."
"I lived the Nazi nightmare, and, as the old saying goes, 'A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument,'" writes von Campe. "Everything I write is based on my personal experience in Nazi Germany. There is nothing theoretical about my description of what happens when a nation throws God out of government and society, and Christians become religious bystanders. I don't want to see a repetition. The role of God in human society is the decisive issue for this generation. My writing is part of my life of restitution for the crimes of a godless government, of the evil of which I was a part."
Von Campe grew up under the Nazis, served in the Hitler Youth and fought against the Red Army in the Yugoslavian theater as a tank gunner in the German army. He was captured at the end of the war and escaped five months later from a prisoner of war camp in Communist Yugoslavia.
"It took me a long time to understand and define the nature of National Socialism," says von Campe. "And, unfortunately, their philosophy continues to flourish under different labels remaining a menace to America and free human society."
He writes: "The most painful part of defining National Socialism was to recognize my own moral responsibility for the Nazi disaster and their crimes against humanity. It boiled down to accepting the truth that 'as I am, so is my nation,' and realizing that if every German was like me, it was no wonder that the nation became a cesspool of gangsters. This realization is as valid today for any person in any nation as it was then, and it is true for America and every American now."
Von Campe's message is that political freedom and democratic rules alone are not sufficient to govern humanity justly.
"Democratic procedures can be subverted and dishonest politicians are like sand in the gearbox, abundant, everywhere and destructive," he writes. "What I see in America today is people painting their cabins while the ship goes down. Today in America we are witnessing a repeat performance of the tragedy of 1933 when an entire nation let itself be led like a lamb to the Socialist slaughterhouse. This time, the end of freedom is inevitable unless America rises to her mission and destiny."
Von Campe says he sees spiritual parallels among Americans and his childhood Germany.
"The silence from our pulpits regarding the moral collapse of American society from within is not very different from the silence that echoed from the pulpits in Germany toward Nazi policies," he explains. "Our family lived through the Nazi years in Germany, an experience typical of millions of Europeans regardless of what side they were on. We paid a high price for the moral perversions of a German government, which excluded God and His Commandments from their policies. America must not continue following the same path to destruction, but instead heed the lessons of history and the warning I am giving."
Specifically, von Campe warns Americans their political leaders are on the wrong footing, "denying our cultural and traditional roots based on our unique Constitution and Christian orientation as a nation. Christians don't understand their mission."
source article
P.S. That's "Christian" orientation. Not "Judeo-Christian." And definitely not anti-Christ "Jewish."
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Don Henley: Inside Job
Whoa! Are people really starting to see the zionist connection? Check out this video while you can.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Obama Will Represent One Minority Group...
Obama will represent one minority group, the one that has usurped the country. The rest of Americans will have to get in line and hope for crumbs.
Arab Americans and Obama, How to Vote Against Your Own Interests
During my first year as a U.S. Senator, I was visited by a member of the Brazilian parliament. He was in the opposition to the dictatorship in Brazil, and that he was sick because of what he knew about the torture the military junta undertook in order to stay in power.
“What can I do?” I asked.
“You have the ability to expose, to publicize what’s happening there.”
“I don’t think I have enough influence to put a stop to it,” I countered.
“You don’t understand,” he said, “if those people who are in prison for political crimes know that someone outside knows of what’s happening them, they will feel hope. As it is now, they despair of anyone ever knowing of their suffering.”
I had not known about conditions in Brazil, but what he said was enough to galvanize me into trying to publicize what the dictatorship was doing. I began introducing amendments to foreign aid legislation that would cut off funds for any country that tortured its own people. I was never able to pass such an amendment, even though, amazingly, the Democrats controlled the Senate back then. I was able, however, to close down the “School for Torture” that was being operated under the name of the School of the Americas, but it was only later that Tom Harkin, after he was elected to the Senate, was able to pass an anti-torture amendment.
I relate this anecdote to remind readers how important it is for people under occupation to know that someone is aware, that there are people who care about what’s happening to them. This sentiment is especially true for those Palestinians who have lived under Israeli occupation since 1948, and the years following. There is a feeling by those people that the world doesn’t care what happens to them. That is why it is doubly important that voices of protest over the illegal Israeli occupation continue to be heard, despite the seeming hopelessness of their condition.
The backbone of protest here in the United States has been, by and large, the Arab American community. This is a group of people who, by virtue of their special knowledge of what is happening to the Palestinians on a daily basis, have been able to articulate to the American public at large what is going on. Of course, overcoming the political power of the Israeli Lobby has been extremely difficult; the knowledge by those under occupation that someone cares and that someone is trying to do something about it sustains hope when it looks the darkest.
That hope grew dimmer this election year. In spite of the fealty paid to the Israeli Lobby both by Obama and by McCain, and in spite of Ralph Nader doing his best to publicize the brutality of the Israeli occupation, a great many Arab Americans abandoned Nader and his message in favor of the other candidates.
Of course, we all understood that Nader would not win the election, but the movement of Arab Americans away from him regrettably deprives him of the political influence he might have gained to press his positions, including his strong criticism of Israel’s illegal occupation. His voice is considerably weakened because of the movement of Arab American voters to other candidates, which is unfortunate for those Palestinians who live in desperation on a daily basis. The same is true for the people of Lebanon and Syria who are in constant fear of being bombed by U.S. warplanes flown by Israeli pilots.
In this election, a great many Arab Americans joined Obama’s winning coalition, despite Obama’s clear indication that he wanted nothing to do with Arabs, either Christian or Muslim. We saw, during his campaign, that his staff prevented Muslim women with head scarves from sitting behind him in view of the television cameras during his campaign rallies. He visited Christian churches and Jewish Synagogues, but he refused to visit even one Mosque during the campaign. And, finally, joining John McCain, he made the obligatory bow and scrape to the Israeli Lobby—AIPAC—during that group’s 2008 convention. He made no attempt to hide any of these clearly pro-Israeli actions from Arab Americans. Had he done the same toward any other ethnic group, we would expect that the group would find another electoral home for their support and their votes. But that, apparently, is not what happened this year. Arab Americans voted overwhelmingly in support of Obama, rushing right past Ralph Nader, who has articulated the community’s feelings about the Israeli occupation.
This is a continuation of the self-destructive attitude held by people of Arab descent. We see it in the Arab world, and we see it among the Arab diaspora. We see the urge to defeat or to overlook one of our own in favor of catering to those we think are certain to hold power.
Someone once said that when the Zionists looked around for a place to organize an exclusive Jewish state, they chose their target wisely. When Arab Americans, and Arabs as well, learn to act in their own interests, then the day will come when politicians will begin to listen to what they have to say. Arab Americans desperately need to learn to reward their friends. Failing that, all that remains for them will be their enemies.
source article
P.S. Well, maybe now Obama will shake your hand. Just don't be wearing any head scarves when cameras are around. And never ever talk about zionism.
“What can I do?” I asked.
“You have the ability to expose, to publicize what’s happening there.”
“I don’t think I have enough influence to put a stop to it,” I countered.
“You don’t understand,” he said, “if those people who are in prison for political crimes know that someone outside knows of what’s happening them, they will feel hope. As it is now, they despair of anyone ever knowing of their suffering.”
I had not known about conditions in Brazil, but what he said was enough to galvanize me into trying to publicize what the dictatorship was doing. I began introducing amendments to foreign aid legislation that would cut off funds for any country that tortured its own people. I was never able to pass such an amendment, even though, amazingly, the Democrats controlled the Senate back then. I was able, however, to close down the “School for Torture” that was being operated under the name of the School of the Americas, but it was only later that Tom Harkin, after he was elected to the Senate, was able to pass an anti-torture amendment.
I relate this anecdote to remind readers how important it is for people under occupation to know that someone is aware, that there are people who care about what’s happening to them. This sentiment is especially true for those Palestinians who have lived under Israeli occupation since 1948, and the years following. There is a feeling by those people that the world doesn’t care what happens to them. That is why it is doubly important that voices of protest over the illegal Israeli occupation continue to be heard, despite the seeming hopelessness of their condition.
The backbone of protest here in the United States has been, by and large, the Arab American community. This is a group of people who, by virtue of their special knowledge of what is happening to the Palestinians on a daily basis, have been able to articulate to the American public at large what is going on. Of course, overcoming the political power of the Israeli Lobby has been extremely difficult; the knowledge by those under occupation that someone cares and that someone is trying to do something about it sustains hope when it looks the darkest.
That hope grew dimmer this election year. In spite of the fealty paid to the Israeli Lobby both by Obama and by McCain, and in spite of Ralph Nader doing his best to publicize the brutality of the Israeli occupation, a great many Arab Americans abandoned Nader and his message in favor of the other candidates.
Of course, we all understood that Nader would not win the election, but the movement of Arab Americans away from him regrettably deprives him of the political influence he might have gained to press his positions, including his strong criticism of Israel’s illegal occupation. His voice is considerably weakened because of the movement of Arab American voters to other candidates, which is unfortunate for those Palestinians who live in desperation on a daily basis. The same is true for the people of Lebanon and Syria who are in constant fear of being bombed by U.S. warplanes flown by Israeli pilots.
In this election, a great many Arab Americans joined Obama’s winning coalition, despite Obama’s clear indication that he wanted nothing to do with Arabs, either Christian or Muslim. We saw, during his campaign, that his staff prevented Muslim women with head scarves from sitting behind him in view of the television cameras during his campaign rallies. He visited Christian churches and Jewish Synagogues, but he refused to visit even one Mosque during the campaign. And, finally, joining John McCain, he made the obligatory bow and scrape to the Israeli Lobby—AIPAC—during that group’s 2008 convention. He made no attempt to hide any of these clearly pro-Israeli actions from Arab Americans. Had he done the same toward any other ethnic group, we would expect that the group would find another electoral home for their support and their votes. But that, apparently, is not what happened this year. Arab Americans voted overwhelmingly in support of Obama, rushing right past Ralph Nader, who has articulated the community’s feelings about the Israeli occupation.
This is a continuation of the self-destructive attitude held by people of Arab descent. We see it in the Arab world, and we see it among the Arab diaspora. We see the urge to defeat or to overlook one of our own in favor of catering to those we think are certain to hold power.
Someone once said that when the Zionists looked around for a place to organize an exclusive Jewish state, they chose their target wisely. When Arab Americans, and Arabs as well, learn to act in their own interests, then the day will come when politicians will begin to listen to what they have to say. Arab Americans desperately need to learn to reward their friends. Failing that, all that remains for them will be their enemies.
source article
P.S. Well, maybe now Obama will shake your hand. Just don't be wearing any head scarves when cameras are around. And never ever talk about zionism.
Project for No American Century
The Project for a New American Century cut America's stability short by almost a century.
If the "New Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had so lustily recommended hadn't been allowed to "accidentally" happen, if its call for taking out Saddam and using preemptive war hadn't been carried out, the U.S. would still be solvent, and we wouldn't have created enemies all over the globe.
China may still have overtaken us as the world's leader eventually, but we would have at least had a century to live relatively peacefully and prosperously.
Instead, even before 2008, PNAC's agenda bankrupted America economically, socially, and spiritually.
Bill Kristol is thinking of cranking PNAC back up. But there is not much of America left for him and the boys to destroy, since the original Project for No American Century succeeded so brilliantly.
PNAC was launched, of course, by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cambone, Dov Zakheim, Kristol and other leading Neocon architects of America's disastrous foreign policy from 2001 to the present.
source
P.S. But placing all the chips on the table to save Jewish apartheid was worth it, right Madeleine? I mean, we had to give it our all, right? Oh well, time to move to Israel and learn Chinese. Now if we can only get those pesky Palestinians to lie down as easily as the Americans... a TV for every Palestinian home.
If the "New Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had so lustily recommended hadn't been allowed to "accidentally" happen, if its call for taking out Saddam and using preemptive war hadn't been carried out, the U.S. would still be solvent, and we wouldn't have created enemies all over the globe.
China may still have overtaken us as the world's leader eventually, but we would have at least had a century to live relatively peacefully and prosperously.
Instead, even before 2008, PNAC's agenda bankrupted America economically, socially, and spiritually.
Bill Kristol is thinking of cranking PNAC back up. But there is not much of America left for him and the boys to destroy, since the original Project for No American Century succeeded so brilliantly.
PNAC was launched, of course, by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cambone, Dov Zakheim, Kristol and other leading Neocon architects of America's disastrous foreign policy from 2001 to the present.
source
P.S. But placing all the chips on the table to save Jewish apartheid was worth it, right Madeleine? I mean, we had to give it our all, right? Oh well, time to move to Israel and learn Chinese. Now if we can only get those pesky Palestinians to lie down as easily as the Americans... a TV for every Palestinian home.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Dennis Ross: Diplomacy as Strategy
Will Obama continue the overt agression of the Bush administration? Or will he deftly switch to overt diplomacy and covert agression? The diplomacy is merely used as strategy in pursuing the same goals as always. Dennis Ross, and the likes of him, would say to their hard right companions, 'Hey, I want the same thing you want. It's just that our approach is different.'
The covert agression is just as ugly and evil as the overt agression. But it will be out of the headlines. The headlines will be portraying our 'altruistic' diplomacy to get along with everybody. When you know zionists, you know that diplomacy and "friendship" is merely strategy. The "war on terror" to shove zionism down the world's throat will go on. It'll go on for generations in one form or another by successive administrations, but it must go on, as the Decider himself stated.
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Conned Again.. or Obama Brings Out His Really Scary Friends
If the change President-elect Obama has promised includes a halt to America’s wars of aggression and an end to the rip-off of taxpayers by powerful financial interests, what explains Obama’s choice of foreign and economic policy advisors? Indeed, Obama’s selection of Rahm Israel Emanuel as White House chief of staff is a signal that change ended with Obama’s election. The only thing different about the new administration will be the faces.
Rahm Israel Emanuel is a supporter of Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Emanuel rose to prominence in the Democratic Party as a result of his fundraising connections to AIPAC. A strong supporter of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, he comes from a terrorist family. His father was a member of Irgun, a Jewish terrorist organization that used violence to drive the British and Palestinians out of Palestine in order to create the Jewish state. During the 1991 Gulf War, Rahm Israel Emanuel volunteered to serve in the Israel Defense Forces. He was a member of the Freddie Mac board of directors and received $231,655 in directors fees in 2001. According to Wikipedia, “during the time Emanuel spent on the board, Freddie Mac was plagued with scandals involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities.”
In “Hail to the Chief of Staff,” Alexander Cockburn describes Emanuel as “a super-Likudnik hawk,” who as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2006 “made great efforts to knock out antiwar Democratic candidates.”
My despondent friends in the Israeli peace movement ask, “What is this man doing in Obama’s administration?”
Obama’s election was necessary as the only means Americans had to hold the Republicans accountable for their crimes against the Constitution and human rights, for their violations of US and international laws, for their lies and deceptions, and for their financial chicanery. As an editorial in Pravda put it, “Only Satan would have been worse than the Bush regime. Therefore it could be argued that the new administration in the USA could never be worse than the one which divorced the hearts and minds of Americans from their brothers in the international community, which appalled the rest of the world with shock and awe tactics that included concentration camps, torture, mass murder and utter disrespect for international law.”
But Obama’s advisers are drawn from the same gang of Washington thugs and Wall Street banksters as Bush’s. Richard Holbrooke, son of Russian and German Jews, was an assistant secretary of state and ambassador in the Clinton administration. He implemented the policy to enlarge NATO and to place the military alliance on Russia’s border in contravention of Reagan’s promise to Gorbachev. Holbrooke is also associated with the Clinton administration’s illegal bombing of Serbia, a war crime that killed civilians and Chinese diplomats. If not a neocon himself, Holbrooke is closely allied with them.
According to Wikipedia, Madeline Albright was born Marie Jana Korbelova in Prague to Jewish parents who had converted to Catholicism in order to escape persecution. She is the Clinton era secretary of state who told Leslie Stahl (60 Minutes) that the US policy of Iraq sanctions, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, had goals important enough to justify the children’s deaths. Albright’s infamous words: “we think the price is worth it.” Wikipedia reports that this immoralist served on the board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange at the time of Dick Grasso’s $187.5 million compensation scandal.
Dennis Ross has long associations with the Israeli-Palestinian “peace negotiations.” A member of his Clinton era team, Aaron David Miller, wrote that during 1999-2000 the US negotiating team led by Ross acted as Israel’s lawyer: “we had to run everything by Israel first.” This “stripped our policy of the independence and flexibility required for serious peacemaking. If we couldn't put proposals on the table without checking with the Israelis first, and refused to push back when they said no, how effective could our mediation be?” According to Wikipedia, Ross is “chairman of a new Jerusalem-based think tank, the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, funded and founded by the Jewish Agency.”
Clearly, this is not a group of advisors that is going to halt America’s wars against Israel’s enemies or force the Israeli government to accept the necessary conditions for a real peace in the Middle East.
Ralph Nader predicted as much. In his “Open Letter to Barack Obama (November 3, 2008), Nader pointed out to Obama that his “transformation from an articulate defender of Palestinian rights . . . to a dittoman for the hard-line AIPAC lobby” puts Obama at odds with “a majority of Jewish-Americans” and “64% of Israelis.” Nader quotes the Israeli writer and peace advocate Uri Avnery’s description of Obama’s appearance before AIPAC as an appearance that “broke all records for obsequiousness and fawning.” Nader damns Obama for his “utter lack of political courage [for] surrendering to demands of the hard-liners to prohibit former president Jimmy Carter from speaking at the Democratic National Convention.” Carter, who achieved the only meaningful peace agreement between Israel and the Arabs, has been demonized by the powerful AIPAC lobby for criticizing Israel’s policy of apartheid toward the Palestinians whose territory Israel forcibly occupies.
Obama’s economic team is just as bad. Its star is Robert Rubin, the bankster who was secretary of the treasury in the Clinton administration. Rubin has responsibility for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and, thereby, responsibility for the current financial crisis. In his letter to Obama, Nader points out that Obama received unprecedented campaign contributions from corporate and Wall Street interests. “Never before has a Democratic nominee for President achieved this supremacy over his Republican counterpart.”
Obama’s victory speech was magnificent. The TV cameras scanning faces in the audience showed the hope and belief that propelled Obama into the presidency. But Obama cannot bring change to Washington. There is no one in the Washington crowd that he can appoint who is capable of bringing change. If Obama were to reach outside the usual crowd, anyone suspected of being a bringer of change could not get confirmed by the Senate. Powerful interest groups--AIPAC, the military-security complex, Wall Street--use their political influence to block unacceptable appointments.
As Alexander Cockburn put it in his column, “Obama, the first-rate Republican,” “never has the dead hand of the past had a ‘reform’ candidate so firmly by the windpipe.” Obama confirmed Cockburn’s verdict in his first press conference as president-elect. Disregarding the unanimous US National Intelligence Estimate, which concluded that Iran stopped working on nuclear weapons five years ago, and ignoring the continued certification by the International Atomic Energy Agency that none of the nuclear material for Iran’s civilian nuclear reactor has been diverted to weapons use, Obama sallied forth with the Israel Lobby’s propaganda and accused Iran of “development of a nuclear weapon” and vowing “to prevent that from happening.”
The change that is coming to America has nothing to do with Obama. Change is coming from the financial crisis brought on by Wall Street greed and irresponsibility, from the eroding role of the US dollar as reserve currency, from countless mortgage foreclosures, from the offshoring of millions of America’s best jobs, from a deepening recession, from pillars of American manufacturing--Ford and GM--begging the government for taxpayers’ money to stay alive, and from budget and trade deficits that are too large to be closed by normal means.
Traditionally, the government relies on monetary and fiscal policy to lift the economy out of recession. But easy money is not working. Interest rates are already low and monetary growth is already high, yet unemployment is rising. The budget deficit is already huge--a world record--and the red ink is not stimulating the economy. Can even lower interest rates and even higher budget deficits help an economy that has moved offshore, leaving behind jobless consumers overburdened with debt?
How much more can the government borrow? America’s foreign creditors are asking this question. An official organ of the Chinese ruling party recently called for Asian and European countries to “banish the US dollar from their direct trade relations, relying only on their own currencies.”
“Why,” asks another Chinese publication, “should China help the US to issue debt without end in the belief that the national credit of the US can expand without limit?” The world has tired of American hegemony and had its fill of American arrogance. America’s reputation is in tatters: the financial debacle, endless red ink, Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, rendition, torture, illegal wars based on lies and deception, disrespect for the sovereignty of other countries, war crimes, disregard for international law and the Geneva Conventions, the assault on habeas corpus and the separation of powers, a domestic police state, constant interference in the internal affairs of other countries, boundless hypocrisy.
The change that is coming is the end of American empire. The hegemon has run out of money and influence. Obama as “America’s First Black President” will lift hopes and, thus, allow the act to be carried on a little longer. But the New American Century is already over.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts.
P.S. I don't give a damn about the friends McCain's campaign was trying to scare us with. Obama's Jewish puppet masters are the ones that should really scare Americans. Can you say "United States of Israel"? Hell, we are all its subjects.
Rahm Israel Emanuel is a supporter of Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Emanuel rose to prominence in the Democratic Party as a result of his fundraising connections to AIPAC. A strong supporter of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, he comes from a terrorist family. His father was a member of Irgun, a Jewish terrorist organization that used violence to drive the British and Palestinians out of Palestine in order to create the Jewish state. During the 1991 Gulf War, Rahm Israel Emanuel volunteered to serve in the Israel Defense Forces. He was a member of the Freddie Mac board of directors and received $231,655 in directors fees in 2001. According to Wikipedia, “during the time Emanuel spent on the board, Freddie Mac was plagued with scandals involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities.”
In “Hail to the Chief of Staff,” Alexander Cockburn describes Emanuel as “a super-Likudnik hawk,” who as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2006 “made great efforts to knock out antiwar Democratic candidates.”
My despondent friends in the Israeli peace movement ask, “What is this man doing in Obama’s administration?”
Obama’s election was necessary as the only means Americans had to hold the Republicans accountable for their crimes against the Constitution and human rights, for their violations of US and international laws, for their lies and deceptions, and for their financial chicanery. As an editorial in Pravda put it, “Only Satan would have been worse than the Bush regime. Therefore it could be argued that the new administration in the USA could never be worse than the one which divorced the hearts and minds of Americans from their brothers in the international community, which appalled the rest of the world with shock and awe tactics that included concentration camps, torture, mass murder and utter disrespect for international law.”
But Obama’s advisers are drawn from the same gang of Washington thugs and Wall Street banksters as Bush’s. Richard Holbrooke, son of Russian and German Jews, was an assistant secretary of state and ambassador in the Clinton administration. He implemented the policy to enlarge NATO and to place the military alliance on Russia’s border in contravention of Reagan’s promise to Gorbachev. Holbrooke is also associated with the Clinton administration’s illegal bombing of Serbia, a war crime that killed civilians and Chinese diplomats. If not a neocon himself, Holbrooke is closely allied with them.
According to Wikipedia, Madeline Albright was born Marie Jana Korbelova in Prague to Jewish parents who had converted to Catholicism in order to escape persecution. She is the Clinton era secretary of state who told Leslie Stahl (60 Minutes) that the US policy of Iraq sanctions, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children, had goals important enough to justify the children’s deaths. Albright’s infamous words: “we think the price is worth it.” Wikipedia reports that this immoralist served on the board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange at the time of Dick Grasso’s $187.5 million compensation scandal.
Dennis Ross has long associations with the Israeli-Palestinian “peace negotiations.” A member of his Clinton era team, Aaron David Miller, wrote that during 1999-2000 the US negotiating team led by Ross acted as Israel’s lawyer: “we had to run everything by Israel first.” This “stripped our policy of the independence and flexibility required for serious peacemaking. If we couldn't put proposals on the table without checking with the Israelis first, and refused to push back when they said no, how effective could our mediation be?” According to Wikipedia, Ross is “chairman of a new Jerusalem-based think tank, the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, funded and founded by the Jewish Agency.”
Clearly, this is not a group of advisors that is going to halt America’s wars against Israel’s enemies or force the Israeli government to accept the necessary conditions for a real peace in the Middle East.
Ralph Nader predicted as much. In his “Open Letter to Barack Obama (November 3, 2008), Nader pointed out to Obama that his “transformation from an articulate defender of Palestinian rights . . . to a dittoman for the hard-line AIPAC lobby” puts Obama at odds with “a majority of Jewish-Americans” and “64% of Israelis.” Nader quotes the Israeli writer and peace advocate Uri Avnery’s description of Obama’s appearance before AIPAC as an appearance that “broke all records for obsequiousness and fawning.” Nader damns Obama for his “utter lack of political courage [for] surrendering to demands of the hard-liners to prohibit former president Jimmy Carter from speaking at the Democratic National Convention.” Carter, who achieved the only meaningful peace agreement between Israel and the Arabs, has been demonized by the powerful AIPAC lobby for criticizing Israel’s policy of apartheid toward the Palestinians whose territory Israel forcibly occupies.
Obama’s economic team is just as bad. Its star is Robert Rubin, the bankster who was secretary of the treasury in the Clinton administration. Rubin has responsibility for the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and, thereby, responsibility for the current financial crisis. In his letter to Obama, Nader points out that Obama received unprecedented campaign contributions from corporate and Wall Street interests. “Never before has a Democratic nominee for President achieved this supremacy over his Republican counterpart.”
Obama’s victory speech was magnificent. The TV cameras scanning faces in the audience showed the hope and belief that propelled Obama into the presidency. But Obama cannot bring change to Washington. There is no one in the Washington crowd that he can appoint who is capable of bringing change. If Obama were to reach outside the usual crowd, anyone suspected of being a bringer of change could not get confirmed by the Senate. Powerful interest groups--AIPAC, the military-security complex, Wall Street--use their political influence to block unacceptable appointments.
As Alexander Cockburn put it in his column, “Obama, the first-rate Republican,” “never has the dead hand of the past had a ‘reform’ candidate so firmly by the windpipe.” Obama confirmed Cockburn’s verdict in his first press conference as president-elect. Disregarding the unanimous US National Intelligence Estimate, which concluded that Iran stopped working on nuclear weapons five years ago, and ignoring the continued certification by the International Atomic Energy Agency that none of the nuclear material for Iran’s civilian nuclear reactor has been diverted to weapons use, Obama sallied forth with the Israel Lobby’s propaganda and accused Iran of “development of a nuclear weapon” and vowing “to prevent that from happening.”
The change that is coming to America has nothing to do with Obama. Change is coming from the financial crisis brought on by Wall Street greed and irresponsibility, from the eroding role of the US dollar as reserve currency, from countless mortgage foreclosures, from the offshoring of millions of America’s best jobs, from a deepening recession, from pillars of American manufacturing--Ford and GM--begging the government for taxpayers’ money to stay alive, and from budget and trade deficits that are too large to be closed by normal means.
Traditionally, the government relies on monetary and fiscal policy to lift the economy out of recession. But easy money is not working. Interest rates are already low and monetary growth is already high, yet unemployment is rising. The budget deficit is already huge--a world record--and the red ink is not stimulating the economy. Can even lower interest rates and even higher budget deficits help an economy that has moved offshore, leaving behind jobless consumers overburdened with debt?
How much more can the government borrow? America’s foreign creditors are asking this question. An official organ of the Chinese ruling party recently called for Asian and European countries to “banish the US dollar from their direct trade relations, relying only on their own currencies.”
“Why,” asks another Chinese publication, “should China help the US to issue debt without end in the belief that the national credit of the US can expand without limit?” The world has tired of American hegemony and had its fill of American arrogance. America’s reputation is in tatters: the financial debacle, endless red ink, Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, rendition, torture, illegal wars based on lies and deception, disrespect for the sovereignty of other countries, war crimes, disregard for international law and the Geneva Conventions, the assault on habeas corpus and the separation of powers, a domestic police state, constant interference in the internal affairs of other countries, boundless hypocrisy.
The change that is coming is the end of American empire. The hegemon has run out of money and influence. Obama as “America’s First Black President” will lift hopes and, thus, allow the act to be carried on a little longer. But the New American Century is already over.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts.
P.S. I don't give a damn about the friends McCain's campaign was trying to scare us with. Obama's Jewish puppet masters are the ones that should really scare Americans. Can you say "United States of Israel"? Hell, we are all its subjects.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Obama's Choice Draws Anti-Arab Taunt
In strikingly racist remarks, the father of Rahm Emanuel has said Israel will benefit from Obama's choice of White House chief of staff.
"Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House," Benjamin Emanuel, father of Rahm Emanuel, told the Israeli Ma'ariv daily.
In a Thursday statement, US president-elect Barack Obama announced that Rahm Emanuel had accepted his offer to serve as the next White House chief of staff, the highest-ranking member of the Executive Office of the President of the United States.
News of Benjamin Emanuel's comments came as Israeli newspapers rejoiced over Obama's choice of the Illinois Congressman to become 'the second-most powerful man in Washington'.
According to the Israeli Ha'aretz paper, Benjamin Emanuel 'is a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948.'
Rahm Emanuel, who is named after a Zionist combatant, also served for the Israeli military during the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
The appointment of Emanuel has not been welcomed in the Muslim world, where many feel that rather than reflecting Obama's campaign cry of 'Change', the move demonstrates the president-elect will continue to play the same old Washington foreign policy tune.
"There could not be a more provocative appointment than Rahm Emanuel, if he wanted to send a signal that he is going to stick by a quite hard-line pro-Israel policy," Ali Abunimah of the Electronic Intifadah said on Democracy Now.
“[Emanuel's father] was a gun runner for the Irgun, the Zionist, pre-Israel Zionist, militia that carried out numerous terrorist attacks on Palestinian civilians, including the bombing of the King David Hotel," said Abunimah.
He added that although Rahm Israel Emanuel himself was not responsible for those activities, his record is “far to the right of President [George] Bush when it comes to supporting Israel.”
source
P.S. Obama's administration will be a reflection of American society: complete subjugation to the cause of zionism [Jewish apartheid/Jewish exceptionalism].
"Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House," Benjamin Emanuel, father of Rahm Emanuel, told the Israeli Ma'ariv daily.
In a Thursday statement, US president-elect Barack Obama announced that Rahm Emanuel had accepted his offer to serve as the next White House chief of staff, the highest-ranking member of the Executive Office of the President of the United States.
News of Benjamin Emanuel's comments came as Israeli newspapers rejoiced over Obama's choice of the Illinois Congressman to become 'the second-most powerful man in Washington'.
According to the Israeli Ha'aretz paper, Benjamin Emanuel 'is a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948.'
Rahm Emanuel, who is named after a Zionist combatant, also served for the Israeli military during the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
The appointment of Emanuel has not been welcomed in the Muslim world, where many feel that rather than reflecting Obama's campaign cry of 'Change', the move demonstrates the president-elect will continue to play the same old Washington foreign policy tune.
"There could not be a more provocative appointment than Rahm Emanuel, if he wanted to send a signal that he is going to stick by a quite hard-line pro-Israel policy," Ali Abunimah of the Electronic Intifadah said on Democracy Now.
“[Emanuel's father] was a gun runner for the Irgun, the Zionist, pre-Israel Zionist, militia that carried out numerous terrorist attacks on Palestinian civilians, including the bombing of the King David Hotel," said Abunimah.
He added that although Rahm Israel Emanuel himself was not responsible for those activities, his record is “far to the right of President [George] Bush when it comes to supporting Israel.”
source
P.S. Obama's administration will be a reflection of American society: complete subjugation to the cause of zionism [Jewish apartheid/Jewish exceptionalism].
Ahmadinejhad's Letter to Obama
In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
Mr. Barack Obama
President-elect of the United States of America
I congratulate you on having gained the majority of the votes of those who took part in the election. As you know, the chances that God gives to his subjects pass swiftly. They can be used for the perfection of humanity and to the benefit of nations or, God forbid, to the detriment of nations.
I hope you will choose to honor the real interests of people and justice and equity over the insatiable appetites of the selfish minority. Use this chance to serve to the extent you can. And leave a good name behind for yourself.
People expect an immediate and clear response to the pressure for fundamental change in the American government's policies, both foreign and domestic. This is the desire of all the world's nations and of the American nation as well, and it should be the objective and basis of all your future government's programs and actions.
On the one hand, the American nation, which has spiritual inclinations, expects your government to focus its energy and will on serving the people; dealing with the current economic crisis; restoring the country's standing, morale and hope; eradicating poverty and discrimination; and renewing respect for individuals, their safety and their rights. It also expects policies that will strengthen the foundations of the family -- part of the teachings of the holy prophets, who are also revered in America.
On the other hand, the nations of the world expect an end to policies based on warmongering, invasion, bullying, trickery, the humiliation of other countries by the imposition of biased and unfair requirements, and a diplomatic approach that has bred hatred for America's leaders and undermined respect for its people. They want to see actions based on justice, respect for the rights of human beings and nations, friendship and non-intervention in the affairs of others. They want the American government to keep its interventions within its own country's borders.
In the sensitive Middle East region, in particular, the expectation is that the unjust actions of the past 60 years will give way to a policy encouraging full rights for all nations, especially the oppressed nations of Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan.
The great civilization-building and justice-seeking nation of Iran would welcome major, fair and real changes, in policies and actions, especially in this region.
If steps are taken in the path of righteousness, toward the goal of carrying out the teachings of the holy prophets, it is hoped that almighty God will help and that the enormous damage done in the past will be somewhat diminished.
I ask the high God to grant all of humanity and all nations health and happiness, honor and prosperity, and to grant rulers and officials the ability to learn from the past and to use every chance to serve, to spread love and kindness, to eradicate oppression, to do justice and to follow the holy guidelines.
Mahmoud Ahmadiniejad
source
P.S. Dear Mahmoud, sorry, Jewish apartheid trumps every other issue. We're going to bomb, bomb, bomb Iran
Mr. Barack Obama
President-elect of the United States of America
I congratulate you on having gained the majority of the votes of those who took part in the election. As you know, the chances that God gives to his subjects pass swiftly. They can be used for the perfection of humanity and to the benefit of nations or, God forbid, to the detriment of nations.
I hope you will choose to honor the real interests of people and justice and equity over the insatiable appetites of the selfish minority. Use this chance to serve to the extent you can. And leave a good name behind for yourself.
People expect an immediate and clear response to the pressure for fundamental change in the American government's policies, both foreign and domestic. This is the desire of all the world's nations and of the American nation as well, and it should be the objective and basis of all your future government's programs and actions.
On the one hand, the American nation, which has spiritual inclinations, expects your government to focus its energy and will on serving the people; dealing with the current economic crisis; restoring the country's standing, morale and hope; eradicating poverty and discrimination; and renewing respect for individuals, their safety and their rights. It also expects policies that will strengthen the foundations of the family -- part of the teachings of the holy prophets, who are also revered in America.
On the other hand, the nations of the world expect an end to policies based on warmongering, invasion, bullying, trickery, the humiliation of other countries by the imposition of biased and unfair requirements, and a diplomatic approach that has bred hatred for America's leaders and undermined respect for its people. They want to see actions based on justice, respect for the rights of human beings and nations, friendship and non-intervention in the affairs of others. They want the American government to keep its interventions within its own country's borders.
In the sensitive Middle East region, in particular, the expectation is that the unjust actions of the past 60 years will give way to a policy encouraging full rights for all nations, especially the oppressed nations of Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan.
The great civilization-building and justice-seeking nation of Iran would welcome major, fair and real changes, in policies and actions, especially in this region.
If steps are taken in the path of righteousness, toward the goal of carrying out the teachings of the holy prophets, it is hoped that almighty God will help and that the enormous damage done in the past will be somewhat diminished.
I ask the high God to grant all of humanity and all nations health and happiness, honor and prosperity, and to grant rulers and officials the ability to learn from the past and to use every chance to serve, to spread love and kindness, to eradicate oppression, to do justice and to follow the holy guidelines.
Mahmoud Ahmadiniejad
source
P.S. Dear Mahmoud, sorry, Jewish apartheid trumps every other issue. We're going to bomb, bomb, bomb Iran
Friday, November 7, 2008
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Obama Presidency: More of the Same...but Worse!
If the masses of people in this nation knew or had known the pertinent facts pertaining to the war mongering “we can fight the war better,” pro-apartheid Zionist, corporate Wall Street-backed, slippery tongued Barack Obama, it is doubtful they would have been so thoroughly bamboozled and hoodwinked to their own detriment and that of the world. Wall Street and the corporate media, however, have, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, engaged in a relentless, ruthless, and absolutely unprecedented campaign of corporate branding and marketing on behalf of Barack Obama, with the peoples of the United States as their targets.
Assuming that the corporate Wall Street elite and its concomitant opinion-forming, omission, and misinformation machinery of the US corporate media successfully installs their favorite choice - Democratic Party Republicrat Barack Obama - as the first colored President of the US Empire, the majority of people in the United States are in for a rude awakening in the form of increased economic austerity, internal political repression, deepened racial disharmony, external US military adventurism, and an endless stream of misleading disinformation from the corporate government.
The peoples of the world will face intensified imperialistic and military assault and attempts at US hegemony. This time, however, the imperialism of the US Empire will be conveniently spearheaded, condoned and rationalized by its newest and most potent weapon: the dangerously double-talking “Emperor” in black face - Barack Obama. Moreover, in one fell and foul swoop, the corporate / military elite of the US Empire intends to utilize Barack Obama as the “messiah” (created by none other than corporate America and its corporate media) to neutralize and destroy the ongoing Black liberation struggle for justice and equality in this nation, and in people’s liberation struggles throughout the world.
In relative short order - inside the United States itself - under a Barack Obama presidency, the living conditions of the majority of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples will continue to steadily and massively deteriorate while the corporate Wall Street barons prolong their glut of the every day people’s finances, resources, hopes, and dreams. Under an Obama presidency those non Blacks who stand in opposition to Barack Obama’s de facto pro Wall Street backers and their blood-sucking policies will be branded as racists and traitors, while those Blacks who oppose Obama’s policies will be ignored and/or branded as fringe radicals and traitors. Thus, the horrors of the US Empire will continue unabated, and in many respects, under Barack Obama, actually worsen. The blame for the deteriorating economy and continued war will of course quickly be laid by the Obama / Biden regime and the Democratic Party Republicrats on the previous Bush / Cheney regime, despite the fact that it was the complicity of the Democratic Party itself with the Bush / Cheney Republican Republicrat regime that facilitated the despicable policies and practices of the Bush / Cheney regime. The fact is that the Democratic and Republican Parties are de facto Republicrats with the objective of exploiting the majority of people and maintaining US Empire abroad.
“I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation. I believe that there will be that kind of clash, but I don’t think it will be based on the color of the skin…” -Malcolm X
After the Democratic Party Republicrats so-called election euphoria and celebrating is over, the Obama / Biden Republicrat regime will get down to the business of placing the ongoing exploitation of the every day people of this nation on fast track. The masses of Black Americans, along with the oppressed and exploited Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation will learn first hand that, notwithstanding the deceptive Obama rhetoric, exploitation nationally and internationally will be intensified. The “clash between those who want freedom, justice, equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” about which Malcolm X referred, will be intensified under Barack Obama, with Obama representing the interests of the oppressors. The political contradictions in this regard will also be increasingly obvious.
Those so-called leftist and progressives who were and are collaborators with US Empire [Chomsky anyone?} will, for a time, try to pretend that their support of Barack Obama was not a sell out, and that they simply need more time to persuade the US Empire’s colored corporate emperor to do the right thing. Meanwhile, Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples will be enduring an unprecedented rate of economic and social suffering. The anger of the people will ultimately peak and explode, as a result of having bought into false hope and raised expectations.
This is precisely why the US corporate government has already made military contingency plans to contain and massively quash dissention within the United States. Barack Obama will serve to provide his corporate / military masters with colored political cover for political repression in this nation; and he will have already provided a small respite of wiggling room for them in this regard. Nevertheless, as brutal reality forces the proverbial scales of blindness to drop from eyes of the masses, it will become crystal clear that the supposed “change” to which Barack Obama referred in his campaign rhetoric, was nothing more than a vicious ruse of double-speak by him, backed by his corporate and military handlers. Indeed, the emperor will be shown to “have no clothes.” But what of the fate of millions of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples inside the US? How many horrible sacrifices will have been, and will yet need to be made by the people in order to get the boot of economic blood-sucking and political repression off their / our necks?
The “clash,” to which Malcolm X referred, “between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” will deepen, as will repression and systemic contradictions. The “clash” will have, by necessity, as Malcolm X suggested, gone beyond “the color of the skin.” Notwithstanding his double speak rhetoric, it will become clear to people that a president Barack Obama supports and wants to “continue the system of exploitation” at home and abroad. Despite continued double speak and corporate disinformation and misinformation, it will be become undeniably clear that a president Barack Obama is the servant of the corporate/ military / prison apparatus of US Empire, and a key facilitator of exploitation and political repression inside and outside the United States.
Building a real, grass roots peoples’ movement inside the United States will then, in some respects, be more challenging but by no means impossible. Notwithstanding the political repression and incessant disinformation that for a certainty will be emanating from the Obama / Biden Democratic Republicrats and their cronies, a genuine peoples’ movement will be, of necessity, the order of the day.
It is no mere coincidence that Democratic Party Republicrat, Barack Obama, had the unheard of amount of approximately 600 million dollars in his political campaign coffer compared with fellow Republican Party Republicrat, John McCain’s, approximately 100 million campaign coffer dollars.
This fact alone should give some crucial insight into the despicable financial role played by corporations, and their outrageous, unacceptable, and massively inordinate amount of influence and control over the electoral system in this so-called democracy. Most of this money is blood money, based upon exploitation from the corporate Wall Street and military corporate elite. This fact alone gives yet another good indication as to what to expect under an Obama presidency. It is totally reprehensible and unacceptable and an utter mockery of democracy.
source
P.S. I was wrong about Obama. I thought he was zionist candidate B.
Assuming that the corporate Wall Street elite and its concomitant opinion-forming, omission, and misinformation machinery of the US corporate media successfully installs their favorite choice - Democratic Party Republicrat Barack Obama - as the first colored President of the US Empire, the majority of people in the United States are in for a rude awakening in the form of increased economic austerity, internal political repression, deepened racial disharmony, external US military adventurism, and an endless stream of misleading disinformation from the corporate government.
The peoples of the world will face intensified imperialistic and military assault and attempts at US hegemony. This time, however, the imperialism of the US Empire will be conveniently spearheaded, condoned and rationalized by its newest and most potent weapon: the dangerously double-talking “Emperor” in black face - Barack Obama. Moreover, in one fell and foul swoop, the corporate / military elite of the US Empire intends to utilize Barack Obama as the “messiah” (created by none other than corporate America and its corporate media) to neutralize and destroy the ongoing Black liberation struggle for justice and equality in this nation, and in people’s liberation struggles throughout the world.
In relative short order - inside the United States itself - under a Barack Obama presidency, the living conditions of the majority of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples will continue to steadily and massively deteriorate while the corporate Wall Street barons prolong their glut of the every day people’s finances, resources, hopes, and dreams. Under an Obama presidency those non Blacks who stand in opposition to Barack Obama’s de facto pro Wall Street backers and their blood-sucking policies will be branded as racists and traitors, while those Blacks who oppose Obama’s policies will be ignored and/or branded as fringe radicals and traitors. Thus, the horrors of the US Empire will continue unabated, and in many respects, under Barack Obama, actually worsen. The blame for the deteriorating economy and continued war will of course quickly be laid by the Obama / Biden regime and the Democratic Party Republicrats on the previous Bush / Cheney regime, despite the fact that it was the complicity of the Democratic Party itself with the Bush / Cheney Republican Republicrat regime that facilitated the despicable policies and practices of the Bush / Cheney regime. The fact is that the Democratic and Republican Parties are de facto Republicrats with the objective of exploiting the majority of people and maintaining US Empire abroad.
“I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation. I believe that there will be that kind of clash, but I don’t think it will be based on the color of the skin…” -Malcolm X
After the Democratic Party Republicrats so-called election euphoria and celebrating is over, the Obama / Biden Republicrat regime will get down to the business of placing the ongoing exploitation of the every day people of this nation on fast track. The masses of Black Americans, along with the oppressed and exploited Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation will learn first hand that, notwithstanding the deceptive Obama rhetoric, exploitation nationally and internationally will be intensified. The “clash between those who want freedom, justice, equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” about which Malcolm X referred, will be intensified under Barack Obama, with Obama representing the interests of the oppressors. The political contradictions in this regard will also be increasingly obvious.
Those so-called leftist and progressives who were and are collaborators with US Empire [Chomsky anyone?} will, for a time, try to pretend that their support of Barack Obama was not a sell out, and that they simply need more time to persuade the US Empire’s colored corporate emperor to do the right thing. Meanwhile, Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples will be enduring an unprecedented rate of economic and social suffering. The anger of the people will ultimately peak and explode, as a result of having bought into false hope and raised expectations.
This is precisely why the US corporate government has already made military contingency plans to contain and massively quash dissention within the United States. Barack Obama will serve to provide his corporate / military masters with colored political cover for political repression in this nation; and he will have already provided a small respite of wiggling room for them in this regard. Nevertheless, as brutal reality forces the proverbial scales of blindness to drop from eyes of the masses, it will become crystal clear that the supposed “change” to which Barack Obama referred in his campaign rhetoric, was nothing more than a vicious ruse of double-speak by him, backed by his corporate and military handlers. Indeed, the emperor will be shown to “have no clothes.” But what of the fate of millions of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples inside the US? How many horrible sacrifices will have been, and will yet need to be made by the people in order to get the boot of economic blood-sucking and political repression off their / our necks?
The “clash,” to which Malcolm X referred, “between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” will deepen, as will repression and systemic contradictions. The “clash” will have, by necessity, as Malcolm X suggested, gone beyond “the color of the skin.” Notwithstanding his double speak rhetoric, it will become clear to people that a president Barack Obama supports and wants to “continue the system of exploitation” at home and abroad. Despite continued double speak and corporate disinformation and misinformation, it will be become undeniably clear that a president Barack Obama is the servant of the corporate/ military / prison apparatus of US Empire, and a key facilitator of exploitation and political repression inside and outside the United States.
Building a real, grass roots peoples’ movement inside the United States will then, in some respects, be more challenging but by no means impossible. Notwithstanding the political repression and incessant disinformation that for a certainty will be emanating from the Obama / Biden Democratic Republicrats and their cronies, a genuine peoples’ movement will be, of necessity, the order of the day.
It is no mere coincidence that Democratic Party Republicrat, Barack Obama, had the unheard of amount of approximately 600 million dollars in his political campaign coffer compared with fellow Republican Party Republicrat, John McCain’s, approximately 100 million campaign coffer dollars.
This fact alone should give some crucial insight into the despicable financial role played by corporations, and their outrageous, unacceptable, and massively inordinate amount of influence and control over the electoral system in this so-called democracy. Most of this money is blood money, based upon exploitation from the corporate Wall Street and military corporate elite. This fact alone gives yet another good indication as to what to expect under an Obama presidency. It is totally reprehensible and unacceptable and an utter mockery of democracy.
source
P.S. I was wrong about Obama. I thought he was zionist candidate B.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Jewish Americans for Obama
Awe. I feel so reassured now, don't you? We don't need Bush or McCain to bomb, bomb, bomb Iran for Israel.
Rahm Imanual: Israel has a friend in Obama.
Congratulations Americans. You've just elected zionist candidate B.
Now that Obama is elected, there are no excuses.
Now that a Democrat has been elected president, the Democrats in Congress have no excuse. They can no longer pretend that they have to "hold back" to win the election.
They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and company for Iraq.
They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges for torture.They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for spying on Americans.
They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for 9/11.
Now is not the time for Democratic machine politics. Now is the time to implement true American values - cherished across the political aisle - of liberty and justice.
There can be no liberty in America unless the tyrants who have tried to imprison us and enslave us are prosecuted.
There can be no justice in America unless the high and mighty are held accountable for their actions.
Obama is a former Constitutional law professor. He knows the value of the Constitution and the rule of law. He promised during his campaign to curb the unconstitutional practices of the executive branch.
But that is not enough. Because if the tyrants in both parties who have trampled on the vision of the founding fathers are not held accountable, then future tyrants will learn that they can get away with it, also.
Now that Obama has won, there is no excuse. Those who have trampled on our country and our people must be held to account for the whole world and future generations to see.
source
P.S. Amen. But I'm afraid our big change is from ZIO-CON to ZIO-LIB. Hey! A black man will be managing the zionist agenda. Brilliant! Now if you oppose killing Muslims and Arabs for Jewish apartheid, you'll be considered racist and antisemitc. Don't you think of double crossing them, Obama. Remember JFK.
They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and company for Iraq.
They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges for torture.They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for spying on Americans.
They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for 9/11.
Now is not the time for Democratic machine politics. Now is the time to implement true American values - cherished across the political aisle - of liberty and justice.
There can be no liberty in America unless the tyrants who have tried to imprison us and enslave us are prosecuted.
There can be no justice in America unless the high and mighty are held accountable for their actions.
Obama is a former Constitutional law professor. He knows the value of the Constitution and the rule of law. He promised during his campaign to curb the unconstitutional practices of the executive branch.
But that is not enough. Because if the tyrants in both parties who have trampled on the vision of the founding fathers are not held accountable, then future tyrants will learn that they can get away with it, also.
Now that Obama has won, there is no excuse. Those who have trampled on our country and our people must be held to account for the whole world and future generations to see.
source
P.S. Amen. But I'm afraid our big change is from ZIO-CON to ZIO-LIB. Hey! A black man will be managing the zionist agenda. Brilliant! Now if you oppose killing Muslims and Arabs for Jewish apartheid, you'll be considered racist and antisemitc. Don't you think of double crossing them, Obama. Remember JFK.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Obama Throws Another Under the Bus for His Zionist Masters
You, Senators, Are No Rashid Khalidi
By Kathleen Christison
I know Rashid Khalidi. You, Senator McCain, are no Rashid Khalidi.
And you, Senator Obama, are most certainly no Rashid Khalidi either.
I don’t know Khalidi very well, but I interviewed him in 1989 for a book on Palestinian political views, and I’ve talked to him on the phone a few times since. I know that he is a superb scholar, as anyone else who has met him, listened to him speak, or read any of his many books knows. He is non-polemical, his tone in both writing and speaking is measured, he writes nothing except what can be backed up by solid evidence. He does not “bash” Israel, and does not “bash” the United States for unquestioningly supporting Israel; he writes only about Israeli and US policy in terms of how these policies affect Palestinians living under Israeli domination and Middle East peoples living under US hegemony. His criticism of Israel is reasoned, unemotional, and balanced. He has frequently criticized the policies of the Palestinian leadership -- that PLO that McCain personally equated to neo-Nazis, that Sarah Palin mocked, and to which the McCain campaign has linked Khalidi -- in similar terms.
It would dignify the charges against Khalidi too much to deny specifically that he is a terrorist or an anti-Semite or an Israel hater. Khalidi himself is wise to have ignored the charges, referring to the political atmosphere today, in his only statement on this imbroglio, as “this idiot wind.”
The irony in this entire mess is that Khalidi has never been a PLO spokesman -- in fact, was chosen to advise the Palestinian delegation to the 1991 Madrid peace conference specifically because he was not linked to the PLO. Israel’s condition for attending the conference – which the United States, as always, bowed to – was that no member of the Palestinian delegation be associated with the PLO. It is a further irony that it would matter little even if Khalidi had been and were still a PLO spokesman. Do these idiot politicians not know that Israel recognized the PLO 15 years ago, that the US has been talking to the PLO ever since, that the PLO heads the recognized leadership of the Palestinians, the semi-governmental Palestinian Authority, that Bill Clinton hosted PLO leader Yasir Arafat and many of his PLO lieutenants in the White House 13 times during his tenure, that George Bush has hosted Mahmoud Abbas, current PA president and PLO leader, several times at the White House, that Israel is negotiating (after a fashion) with Abbas?
It is perhaps easy to dismiss the McCain-Palin rantings as the desperate hate speech of rightwing nuts who have no other means of attacking Barack Obama. The charges against Khalidi are obviously in the same vein as the “Obama is a Muslim/Obama associates with terrorists” charges. But what is totally unconscionable and unacceptable is Obama’s own reaction to the anti-Khalidi ravings. Although it is not surprising from a man who repudiated Jeremiah Wright, his pastor and friend for 20 years, Obama’s betrayal of Khalidi is outrageous and, frankly, quite slimy. After the McCain charges, Obama’s campaign hurried to issue a statement affirming, as its first order of business, Obama’s fealty to Israel and following this up with an assurance that Obama does not agree with Khalidi’s views. No denunciation of the anti-Semitic or the neo-Nazi charges against Khalidi; no recognition of Khalidi’s very reasoned, moderate scholarship; no indication of any loyalty to a friend. Just a frightened, expedient, Obama-must-never-be-associated-with-criticism-of-Israel reaction.
Thus have US politics fallen utterly and completely into the hands of Israel and its vociferous and moneyed supporters in the United States. This sorry episode is clear testimony to how abjectly US political discourse and virtually all US politicians have been absorbed into the Israel lobby’s pro-Israeli and specifically anti-Palestinian agenda. It is also testimony to Barack Obama’s cold, calculating, and highly dishonorable political expediency. However much his political supporters might contend that he will change once elected, he continues to give the lie to that hope.
source
P.S. Obama represents hope for change for people. The only ones that won't be thrown off the bus are zionists. Hopefully as everyone but zionists are thrown off the bus, the people of this country will finally get it, and hijack the bus... and throw the zionists off the bus.
By Kathleen Christison
I know Rashid Khalidi. You, Senator McCain, are no Rashid Khalidi.
And you, Senator Obama, are most certainly no Rashid Khalidi either.
I don’t know Khalidi very well, but I interviewed him in 1989 for a book on Palestinian political views, and I’ve talked to him on the phone a few times since. I know that he is a superb scholar, as anyone else who has met him, listened to him speak, or read any of his many books knows. He is non-polemical, his tone in both writing and speaking is measured, he writes nothing except what can be backed up by solid evidence. He does not “bash” Israel, and does not “bash” the United States for unquestioningly supporting Israel; he writes only about Israeli and US policy in terms of how these policies affect Palestinians living under Israeli domination and Middle East peoples living under US hegemony. His criticism of Israel is reasoned, unemotional, and balanced. He has frequently criticized the policies of the Palestinian leadership -- that PLO that McCain personally equated to neo-Nazis, that Sarah Palin mocked, and to which the McCain campaign has linked Khalidi -- in similar terms.
It would dignify the charges against Khalidi too much to deny specifically that he is a terrorist or an anti-Semite or an Israel hater. Khalidi himself is wise to have ignored the charges, referring to the political atmosphere today, in his only statement on this imbroglio, as “this idiot wind.”
The irony in this entire mess is that Khalidi has never been a PLO spokesman -- in fact, was chosen to advise the Palestinian delegation to the 1991 Madrid peace conference specifically because he was not linked to the PLO. Israel’s condition for attending the conference – which the United States, as always, bowed to – was that no member of the Palestinian delegation be associated with the PLO. It is a further irony that it would matter little even if Khalidi had been and were still a PLO spokesman. Do these idiot politicians not know that Israel recognized the PLO 15 years ago, that the US has been talking to the PLO ever since, that the PLO heads the recognized leadership of the Palestinians, the semi-governmental Palestinian Authority, that Bill Clinton hosted PLO leader Yasir Arafat and many of his PLO lieutenants in the White House 13 times during his tenure, that George Bush has hosted Mahmoud Abbas, current PA president and PLO leader, several times at the White House, that Israel is negotiating (after a fashion) with Abbas?
It is perhaps easy to dismiss the McCain-Palin rantings as the desperate hate speech of rightwing nuts who have no other means of attacking Barack Obama. The charges against Khalidi are obviously in the same vein as the “Obama is a Muslim/Obama associates with terrorists” charges. But what is totally unconscionable and unacceptable is Obama’s own reaction to the anti-Khalidi ravings. Although it is not surprising from a man who repudiated Jeremiah Wright, his pastor and friend for 20 years, Obama’s betrayal of Khalidi is outrageous and, frankly, quite slimy. After the McCain charges, Obama’s campaign hurried to issue a statement affirming, as its first order of business, Obama’s fealty to Israel and following this up with an assurance that Obama does not agree with Khalidi’s views. No denunciation of the anti-Semitic or the neo-Nazi charges against Khalidi; no recognition of Khalidi’s very reasoned, moderate scholarship; no indication of any loyalty to a friend. Just a frightened, expedient, Obama-must-never-be-associated-with-criticism-of-Israel reaction.
Thus have US politics fallen utterly and completely into the hands of Israel and its vociferous and moneyed supporters in the United States. This sorry episode is clear testimony to how abjectly US political discourse and virtually all US politicians have been absorbed into the Israel lobby’s pro-Israeli and specifically anti-Palestinian agenda. It is also testimony to Barack Obama’s cold, calculating, and highly dishonorable political expediency. However much his political supporters might contend that he will change once elected, he continues to give the lie to that hope.
source
P.S. Obama represents hope for change for people. The only ones that won't be thrown off the bus are zionists. Hopefully as everyone but zionists are thrown off the bus, the people of this country will finally get it, and hijack the bus... and throw the zionists off the bus.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Do You Believe Fire Brought Down Three Buildings on 9/11?
Should US Engineers that believe fire caused three buildings to collapse into their own footprints, the path of most resistance, at near freefall speed, be considered competent?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
