Monday, December 1, 2008
How hot were those towers before they collapsed?
Does it matter to you that your government killed so many of its own citizens on 9/11?
Evidence MOSSAD Behind Mumbai Terror Attack
"One police officer who encountered the gunmen as they entered the Jewish centre told the Guardian the attackers were "white" (all of them? How many of them), although this could mean they were paler-skinned Indians from the country's north.
"I went into the building late last night," he said. "I got a shock because they were white. I was expecting them to look like us. They fired three shots. I fired 10 back."
Two of the hostages killed were identified as Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, the couple who ran the centre, said a spokesman for the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. Their 18-month-old son had been one of three people rescued from the centre on Thursday.
In a telephone interview with CBC News from outside the centre, freelance journalist Arun Asthhana said there are reports that some of the militants had stayed at a guest house there for up to 15 days before the attacks.
"They had a huge mass of ammunition, arms and food there," Asthhana said.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Following the Script
Mumbai is ablaze. This attack is huge. My guess is that over a hundred people are involved. All of the people in on this plot ran on a well laid out schedule. Whatever the f*** is going on has been well organised. And whatever it was the organisers intended to achieve, they've achieved it.
Sure enough, it's Muslims. Or so the media tells me. Apparently the terrorists are unhappy with the treatment of Muslims in India. Their plan, as best I can tell, is to kill Indians and foreigners indiscriminately, set fire to major pubic buildings, and take hostages and refuse to release them until Muslims are treated better. Good thinking. Am I alone in wondering at this disconnect?
Between me and the media, it sure looks like it. But it's early days yet. Me, I confidently look forward to the members of the media stating the obvious and saying, 'This doesn't make any sense at all. Who in their right mind would expect that a huge Muslim murder spree would improve the lot of Muslims? How will this achieve anything but having Hindus and Muslims at each other's throats? How would this be in the interest of Muslims?'
Just joking - those questions will never be asked. But if they were I imagine the answer would be that these people are not in their right mind. They're nuts. Nuts who can pull off a coordinated 100 man attack. When it comes to the 'how' they're rational, but on the subject of 'why', they are insane. Um, okay.
Sorry, but between the two prospects of madmen seeking one thing and achieving the obvious and inevitable opposite, and perfectly rational people seeking discord by way of lies and dupes, and succeeding admirably, I'm going to put my money on the latter.
The difference between me and the media is that I have a smattering of history. I know that in 1954 Israeli agents pretending to be Muslims blew up American targets in Cairo in the hopes of prompting the US to attack Egypt. They didn't succeed because the bombers were caught and spilled all the beans. I know that they did it again in 1967 when they attempted to sink the USS Liberty with the loss of all hands and blame it on the Egyptians. The nuke-laden skyhawks were already on their way to Cairo before LBJ and McNamara realised that the Israelis had failed to sink the most lightly armed boat in the US navy and called them back. Oops.
Clearly the Israelis decided that their previous lies had been too modest and on the 11th of September 2001, they attacked multiple US targets and killed 3000. Finally success! Christians and Muslims, at each other's throats. High fives all round. Confirmation indeed that they were precisely as great as they thought they were.
The media obviously doesn't do history. Not unless it's Nazis, that is. Anyway, who in the media has time for history? They can be barely keep up with the script on the autocue, never mind all that boring history stuff about who bombed who whilst pretending to be Muslims. As they say in the media - Don't think, just read the script! And are the words, 'false-flag', 'Israeli agents', or 'overpaid media whores' in the script? Of course not.
Nor should one ask who writes the script. Whoever they are, they're very clever. Without them how would we know that Muslims are irrational murderous motherf***ers who will kill us in spite of the fact that it will advance their interests in no way, shape, or form.
Bullshit!
source article
P.S. Those Muslim terrorists sure know how to pull off mind boggling terrorism events that serve Israel's interests. They're the quintessential bad guys.
Sure enough, it's Muslims. Or so the media tells me. Apparently the terrorists are unhappy with the treatment of Muslims in India. Their plan, as best I can tell, is to kill Indians and foreigners indiscriminately, set fire to major pubic buildings, and take hostages and refuse to release them until Muslims are treated better. Good thinking. Am I alone in wondering at this disconnect?
Between me and the media, it sure looks like it. But it's early days yet. Me, I confidently look forward to the members of the media stating the obvious and saying, 'This doesn't make any sense at all. Who in their right mind would expect that a huge Muslim murder spree would improve the lot of Muslims? How will this achieve anything but having Hindus and Muslims at each other's throats? How would this be in the interest of Muslims?'
Just joking - those questions will never be asked. But if they were I imagine the answer would be that these people are not in their right mind. They're nuts. Nuts who can pull off a coordinated 100 man attack. When it comes to the 'how' they're rational, but on the subject of 'why', they are insane. Um, okay.
Sorry, but between the two prospects of madmen seeking one thing and achieving the obvious and inevitable opposite, and perfectly rational people seeking discord by way of lies and dupes, and succeeding admirably, I'm going to put my money on the latter.
The difference between me and the media is that I have a smattering of history. I know that in 1954 Israeli agents pretending to be Muslims blew up American targets in Cairo in the hopes of prompting the US to attack Egypt. They didn't succeed because the bombers were caught and spilled all the beans. I know that they did it again in 1967 when they attempted to sink the USS Liberty with the loss of all hands and blame it on the Egyptians. The nuke-laden skyhawks were already on their way to Cairo before LBJ and McNamara realised that the Israelis had failed to sink the most lightly armed boat in the US navy and called them back. Oops.
Clearly the Israelis decided that their previous lies had been too modest and on the 11th of September 2001, they attacked multiple US targets and killed 3000. Finally success! Christians and Muslims, at each other's throats. High fives all round. Confirmation indeed that they were precisely as great as they thought they were.
The media obviously doesn't do history. Not unless it's Nazis, that is. Anyway, who in the media has time for history? They can be barely keep up with the script on the autocue, never mind all that boring history stuff about who bombed who whilst pretending to be Muslims. As they say in the media - Don't think, just read the script! And are the words, 'false-flag', 'Israeli agents', or 'overpaid media whores' in the script? Of course not.
Nor should one ask who writes the script. Whoever they are, they're very clever. Without them how would we know that Muslims are irrational murderous motherf***ers who will kill us in spite of the fact that it will advance their interests in no way, shape, or form.
Bullshit!
source article
P.S. Those Muslim terrorists sure know how to pull off mind boggling terrorism events that serve Israel's interests. They're the quintessential bad guys.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Primer on Israeli House Demolitions
part 2 | part 3
P.S. According to one local prominent antiwar/middle eastern activist there is "good" zionism. According to another, after a period of time after being awakened to zionism I should no longer be outraged. Well it's been about five years since I've become aware of zionism and the plight of the Palestinians, and I still haven't seen any evidence of that "good" zionism, and it's awfully hard for me not to be outraged still. I must be wrong headed because these two individuals are embraced by the local Palestinian/Muslim community and I am shunned. So I'll no longer attempt to express solidarity with the local Palestinian/Muslim community or seek solidarity with them. I will however still attempt to raise consciousness to the evil of zionism.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Breaking FKN News: Mumbai Not a CIA/Mossad Job
And Zionists will stop short of WW3 for the cause of Jewish supremacy. And besides, the problem isn't Jewish supremacism, it's terrorism.
Zionists and Unrest in India
The vision of a majority of people of the Asian subcontinent of a united federation spanning from the eastern borders of Bangladesh to the western reaches of Pakistan and from the southern most tip of India to the northern most frontiers of Kashmir can be a reality: through cooperation, mutual respect, and shunning distrust of each other.
Each member state of the new federation will have maximum autonomy, and yet be part of a greater union whose member states are neither superior, nor inferior but equal to other members of the federation; unlike the present Indian system, where the federal government is perceived as being superior to the state governments.
For someone to accept a new idea, the questions that need to be asked are who benefits most and who is there to lose from this new prospect. Although, factually speaking, this really is not a novel idea; all these countries have been united as a single nation throughout much of history.
The people of Pakistan, Kashmir, Bangladesh, and each state of India will be the main benfeciaries.
The losers in this new federation will be the trouble makers who are responsible for causing unrest in India and Pakistan and continually prod the two countries to escalate tension between them. They are defnitely going to be the losers since they lose the monopoly on arms sales to both India and Pakistan. Dont beleive me? Check out the new 20 billion dollar arms sales that Israel recently signed with India. Just google it and you'll see what I am talking about. Israel has been a trouble maker since its inception and has no problem causing death and destruction in other coutries to further chances of its own survival.
For now, let's familiarize ourselves with a widely accepted definition of Zionism, about which I'll be talking about today: Zi·on·ism n. A Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century to occupy Palestinian lands, displace local arabs and establish a Jewish country. Modern Zionism is concerned with the support and survival of the state of Israel.
Israel sees India as its new 'minion' in the region, but little does it know that Indians are smarter, more tolerant and generally peaceful compared to their counterparts in appartheid-ridden Israel. Does anyone else see the conincidence that whenever India and Pakistan come close to having peace talks to normalise relations there is either a terrorist attack in India or some sort of attack in Pakistan.
See the "Tabut Gyadd" plying on the roads of kashmir. (For benefit of non-kashmiri readers, it literlly translates to "Coffin vehicle"). Anyways, these menacing looking bullet-proof Indian Army patrol vehicles were sold by Israel. There are thousands of them in Kashmir and each costs not less than half-a-million US dollars. Israel is laughing all the way to the bank and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that it relishes the thought of more death and destruction in Kashmir and will do everything in its power to escalate the hostilities between Kashmir, India and Pakistan. After all, for their sales pitch to the Indian government, they claim that these vehicles have been tried and tested on the Palestinian people and that these vehicles are perfect for suppressing a hostile people seeking independence.
How convenient it was for Israel. Until the insurgency started in Kashmir, India did not even recognise its existense- in solidarity with the Palestinian people. Thats right! there were no diplomatic relations between Israel and India until the kashmir insurgency started in 1989. You can call me a conspiracy theorist all you want but in 1989 Israel offered a hand to India to battle Kashmiri fighters and India gladly accepted and that was the start of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of arms sales from Israel to India.
A very simple analogy is of two members of a family, who live side by side, and are having a disagreement. And instead of counselling both to reach an agreement, an unscrupulous neighbour starts selling them rocks to throw at each other: Israel is that unscrupulous neighbour!
source more here and here
P.S. Oh yeah. When there's trouble, look for zionists. Think they'll stop short of WW3 pushing their cause of Jewish supremacism?
Each member state of the new federation will have maximum autonomy, and yet be part of a greater union whose member states are neither superior, nor inferior but equal to other members of the federation; unlike the present Indian system, where the federal government is perceived as being superior to the state governments.
For someone to accept a new idea, the questions that need to be asked are who benefits most and who is there to lose from this new prospect. Although, factually speaking, this really is not a novel idea; all these countries have been united as a single nation throughout much of history.
The people of Pakistan, Kashmir, Bangladesh, and each state of India will be the main benfeciaries.
The losers in this new federation will be the trouble makers who are responsible for causing unrest in India and Pakistan and continually prod the two countries to escalate tension between them. They are defnitely going to be the losers since they lose the monopoly on arms sales to both India and Pakistan. Dont beleive me? Check out the new 20 billion dollar arms sales that Israel recently signed with India. Just google it and you'll see what I am talking about. Israel has been a trouble maker since its inception and has no problem causing death and destruction in other coutries to further chances of its own survival.
For now, let's familiarize ourselves with a widely accepted definition of Zionism, about which I'll be talking about today: Zi·on·ism n. A Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century to occupy Palestinian lands, displace local arabs and establish a Jewish country. Modern Zionism is concerned with the support and survival of the state of Israel.
Israel sees India as its new 'minion' in the region, but little does it know that Indians are smarter, more tolerant and generally peaceful compared to their counterparts in appartheid-ridden Israel. Does anyone else see the conincidence that whenever India and Pakistan come close to having peace talks to normalise relations there is either a terrorist attack in India or some sort of attack in Pakistan.
See the "Tabut Gyadd" plying on the roads of kashmir. (For benefit of non-kashmiri readers, it literlly translates to "Coffin vehicle"). Anyways, these menacing looking bullet-proof Indian Army patrol vehicles were sold by Israel. There are thousands of them in Kashmir and each costs not less than half-a-million US dollars. Israel is laughing all the way to the bank and it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that it relishes the thought of more death and destruction in Kashmir and will do everything in its power to escalate the hostilities between Kashmir, India and Pakistan. After all, for their sales pitch to the Indian government, they claim that these vehicles have been tried and tested on the Palestinian people and that these vehicles are perfect for suppressing a hostile people seeking independence.
How convenient it was for Israel. Until the insurgency started in Kashmir, India did not even recognise its existense- in solidarity with the Palestinian people. Thats right! there were no diplomatic relations between Israel and India until the kashmir insurgency started in 1989. You can call me a conspiracy theorist all you want but in 1989 Israel offered a hand to India to battle Kashmiri fighters and India gladly accepted and that was the start of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of arms sales from Israel to India.
A very simple analogy is of two members of a family, who live side by side, and are having a disagreement. And instead of counselling both to reach an agreement, an unscrupulous neighbour starts selling them rocks to throw at each other: Israel is that unscrupulous neighbour!
source more here and here
P.S. Oh yeah. When there's trouble, look for zionists. Think they'll stop short of WW3 pushing their cause of Jewish supremacism?
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Palestinian Village Fights For Survival
On Friday, 21 November, upwards of 500 people—Palestinians, Israelis and Internationals—marched toward the gate of the Wall in the West Bank Palestinian village of Jayyous, and within a few minutes the gate was open and in pieces.
The villagers were ecstatic at what had been accomplished, waving pieces of the gate in the air with smiles ear-to-ear.
Yet, when Israeli soldiers arrived on the scene, they responded by shooting live and rubber bullets at villagers and firing teargas canisters into the air. Five villagers were injured.
After the violence subsided, the soldiers took control of the village, imposed a curfew, and declared it a closed military zone.
Approximately one hour later, the soldiers detained five internationals as they attempted to leave the village in a car along with a number of Palestinians.
“This was a clear message to internationals that they will pay for being present at these demonstrations” said one of the internationals. “The Israeli authorities do not want us here so that they can do what they want with the Palestinians.”
Jayyous was the first village to engage in regular nonviolent protests against the Wall six years ago this month. The situation was so bad for Jayyous that the municipality actually managed to get their case heard at the Israeli High Court.
After years of debate and legal charades, the Court finally ruled on 4 November that the Wall should be moved back by two kilometers.
While sounding like a positive development, the decision will actually make things worse for this small farming community.
Prior to the decision, Jayyous villagers were able to cross the Wall through a gate twice per day to access their olive and citrus groves on the other side of the Wall. Now, the gate will permanently be shut, leaving plenty of space for the expansion of Zufit settlement and the development of an Israeli industrial zone.
The High Court decision is notably in direct contradiction with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 2004, which states that the Wall is illegal in international law, that farmers should be compensated, and that all settlers should be repatriated to the other side of the Green Line.
In all, 5,585 dunam of land will be confiscated from Jayyous once construction of the new Wall is complete, leaving the majority of Jayyous’ farmers stripped of their livelihoods and unemployed.
Given these circumstances, it is certain that the villagers of Jayyous will continue to protest against the Wall, despite the recent High Court decision.
And, as in other villages adversely affected by the Wall, internationals will continue to maintain their presence, despite the arrests and intimidations.
source artice with video
P.S. As long as there is any human decency, there will be resistance to Zionism: Jewish apartheid, Jewish supremacism.
The villagers were ecstatic at what had been accomplished, waving pieces of the gate in the air with smiles ear-to-ear.
Yet, when Israeli soldiers arrived on the scene, they responded by shooting live and rubber bullets at villagers and firing teargas canisters into the air. Five villagers were injured.
After the violence subsided, the soldiers took control of the village, imposed a curfew, and declared it a closed military zone.
Approximately one hour later, the soldiers detained five internationals as they attempted to leave the village in a car along with a number of Palestinians.
“This was a clear message to internationals that they will pay for being present at these demonstrations” said one of the internationals. “The Israeli authorities do not want us here so that they can do what they want with the Palestinians.”
Jayyous was the first village to engage in regular nonviolent protests against the Wall six years ago this month. The situation was so bad for Jayyous that the municipality actually managed to get their case heard at the Israeli High Court.
After years of debate and legal charades, the Court finally ruled on 4 November that the Wall should be moved back by two kilometers.
While sounding like a positive development, the decision will actually make things worse for this small farming community.
Prior to the decision, Jayyous villagers were able to cross the Wall through a gate twice per day to access their olive and citrus groves on the other side of the Wall. Now, the gate will permanently be shut, leaving plenty of space for the expansion of Zufit settlement and the development of an Israeli industrial zone.
The High Court decision is notably in direct contradiction with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 2004, which states that the Wall is illegal in international law, that farmers should be compensated, and that all settlers should be repatriated to the other side of the Green Line.
In all, 5,585 dunam of land will be confiscated from Jayyous once construction of the new Wall is complete, leaving the majority of Jayyous’ farmers stripped of their livelihoods and unemployed.
Given these circumstances, it is certain that the villagers of Jayyous will continue to protest against the Wall, despite the recent High Court decision.
And, as in other villages adversely affected by the Wall, internationals will continue to maintain their presence, despite the arrests and intimidations.
source artice with video
P.S. As long as there is any human decency, there will be resistance to Zionism: Jewish apartheid, Jewish supremacism.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist, The "War on Terror" is Fake.
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist is a new documentary from The Corbett Report that interrogates the mythology of Al Qaeda as a shadowy terrorist organization led by arch-villain Osama Bin Laden. The film will look at the group's founding and funding by American intelligence, the Al Qaeda agents who are harboured and protected by foreign governments, the 9/11 myth and the fake videos that have been released in order to propagate the Al Qaeda myth. The documentary will also look at the reasons behind the creation of this phoney enemy and what the average citizen can do to work against the propaganda of the controlled corporate media.
P.S. Anyone with functioning brain matter between their ears knows that the "war on terror" is fake, and that 9-11 was an inside job.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Apartheid in Palestine
Friday, November 21, 2008
Irrefutably 9-11 Was An Inside Job
Why is the mainstream press avoiding the truth about 9-11? If you're avoiding and denying the truth about 9-11, why are you? And if you are, what/who is that helping?
Thursday, November 20, 2008
I would have killed her even if she was three years old.
An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.
The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.
Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah's hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.
On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that's mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."
A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".
source article
P.S. It may be difficult for those non-indoctrinated in the culture to understand the self-chosenites' ethics. We'll just have to accept things until we understand.
The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.
Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah's hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.
On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that's mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."
A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".
source article
P.S. It may be difficult for those non-indoctrinated in the culture to understand the self-chosenites' ethics. We'll just have to accept things until we understand.
Israel-Firsters: The Greatest Danger
Special thanks to kosher anti-war organizations for not bringing up Israel or the Isael-firsters, the real war mongers, in your protests. We probably couldn't continue the "war on terror" without your cooperation. The people might be up in arms to stop it otherwise.
The Lonely Decider
Googling "Bush" and "Bully" together brings up over two million references. I wonder how many references would come up for "Bush" with "Dummy" or "Stupid" or "Nitwit."
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Israeli Air Force Ready To Attack Iran
Israeli Air Force says it is ready to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. Israeli Air Force Commander General Ido Nehushtan claims his forces are ready to follow any order to thwart Iran's nuclear programs.
"The IAF is a very robust and flexible force … ready to do whatever is demanded," Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel on Tuesday.
He added, however, a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities "is a political decision" and has nothing to do with Israel's military capabilities.
The Nehushtan interview coincides with recent remarks by former Israeli military general, Moshe Ya'alon, who said that Israeli armed forces have the 'right capabilities' to launch a successful strike against Iran.
Ya'alon also revealed the wider ambitions of the Israeli regime aimed at toppling the Iranian government.
"[A strike] is not the end of the game. Then, we should follow it up with a viable, sustainable military operation to target the facilities [serving] the regime's interests, and not allow the regime to rehabilitate itself."
The threats against Iran's nuclear program conflict with the latest report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, which revealed that its inspectors have not found any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
source article
P.S. Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Is it World War Three yet?
"The IAF is a very robust and flexible force … ready to do whatever is demanded," Nehushtan told German magazine Der Spiegel on Tuesday.
He added, however, a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities "is a political decision" and has nothing to do with Israel's military capabilities.
The Nehushtan interview coincides with recent remarks by former Israeli military general, Moshe Ya'alon, who said that Israeli armed forces have the 'right capabilities' to launch a successful strike against Iran.
Ya'alon also revealed the wider ambitions of the Israeli regime aimed at toppling the Iranian government.
"[A strike] is not the end of the game. Then, we should follow it up with a viable, sustainable military operation to target the facilities [serving] the regime's interests, and not allow the regime to rehabilitate itself."
The threats against Iran's nuclear program conflict with the latest report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, which revealed that its inspectors have not found any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
source article
P.S. Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Is it World War Three yet?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
