The zionists claim Bin Laden killed the women and children.
Jewish security analysts contend this is Al Qaida, who are killing the children. Zev Rosen contends that a number of these bombs are Shiites killing Sunnis.
When questioned about the possibility of Mossad involvement, the terror experts denied it as anti Semitism. They did not rule out the CIA and Blackwater...
...or moon phases, anything but what it really is: jews.
Until Americans have the courage to say who the enemy really is [the jews] there's no hope; there'll be continued war.
How long will we be shooting and bombing ourselves [humanity] for the jews?
[The jews themselves acknowledge they're not part of the human cattle.]
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Friday, December 4, 2009
Is World War Three Around the Corner?
Is WW3 around the corner? Do you think the zionists that control our country would stop short of provoking WW3 in pursuing and defending their interests? Or is it high time to say no to zionism?
Benjamin Freedman tried to warn us [here] back in 1961...before JFK was murdered trying to rest this country from the zionists.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Kosher Killing Non-Jews
The referenced article is here... And where is the protest in this country from any of our knighted "good," "anti-zionist" Jews?
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
It wasn't Muslims!!!
With a peer-reviewed scientific journal having published "loaded gun" (i.e. unreacted nano-thermite) evidence finally proving beyond doubt that World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down in a series of controlled demolitions, here are a few more facts to consider.
It wasn't Muslims in an Afghan cave who had access to highly energetic nano-thermites; it was the US military and government scientists such as those connected with NIST.
It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that was awarded a $124 million contract for construction of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) headquarters in Washington, DC, which oversees the Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), which was described during the 1990s as the "National Center for Energetics", the military's term for "explosives work", and as of 1999-2000 the "only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States"; it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01, and who even writes parts of Presidential speeches.
It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that had supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the post 9/11 collection and disposal of the steel wreckage of the WTC towers, and carried out extensive renovations throughout the World Trade Center complex right up to the morning of 9/11 including fireproofing upgrades on the floors that were struck by planes and subsequently "failed", when the steel had already been certified to ASTM E119 by Universal Laboratories, and, in tests sponsored by NIST on corresponding floor assemblies subjected to greater heat exposure and protected with less fireproofing than was the case at the WTC, the test specimens "were able to sustain the maximum design load" without collapsing for as long as the tests were run (2 to 3 1/2 hours); it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01 and received a Torch of Conscience award from the American Jewish Congress.
It wasn't Muslims who trained their cameras on the World Trade Center Towers prior to the first aircraft impact, who danced and celebrated with high fives prior to the second impact as most onlookers still believed it had been a terrible accident rather than terrorism, and who were caught with foreign passports, $4,700 in cash hidden in a sock, maps highlighting certain places in the city, and a van that tested positive for traces of explosives; it was Israelis Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari, several of whom have been confirmed as Mossad agents, as part of their job in "documenting the event".
It wasn't Muslims who were caught on 9/11/01 operating in teams with vans full of explosives, including one team who attempted to blow up the George Washington Bridge with a truck packed with tons of explosives, and another who blew up a van between 6th and 7th on King Street with a mural painted of a remote controlled airplane diving into New York and blowing up; it was Israelis, which is why the authorities did their best to ignore and bury these reports which included a suspected van bomb driven into the WTC basement and exploded to weaken the structure.
Read more with links here.
It wasn't Muslims in an Afghan cave who had access to highly energetic nano-thermites; it was the US military and government scientists such as those connected with NIST.
It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that was awarded a $124 million contract for construction of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) headquarters in Washington, DC, which oversees the Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), which was described during the 1990s as the "National Center for Energetics", the military's term for "explosives work", and as of 1999-2000 the "only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States"; it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01, and who even writes parts of Presidential speeches.
It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that had supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the post 9/11 collection and disposal of the steel wreckage of the WTC towers, and carried out extensive renovations throughout the World Trade Center complex right up to the morning of 9/11 including fireproofing upgrades on the floors that were struck by planes and subsequently "failed", when the steel had already been certified to ASTM E119 by Universal Laboratories, and, in tests sponsored by NIST on corresponding floor assemblies subjected to greater heat exposure and protected with less fireproofing than was the case at the WTC, the test specimens "were able to sustain the maximum design load" without collapsing for as long as the tests were run (2 to 3 1/2 hours); it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01 and received a Torch of Conscience award from the American Jewish Congress.
It wasn't Muslims who trained their cameras on the World Trade Center Towers prior to the first aircraft impact, who danced and celebrated with high fives prior to the second impact as most onlookers still believed it had been a terrible accident rather than terrorism, and who were caught with foreign passports, $4,700 in cash hidden in a sock, maps highlighting certain places in the city, and a van that tested positive for traces of explosives; it was Israelis Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari, several of whom have been confirmed as Mossad agents, as part of their job in "documenting the event".
It wasn't Muslims who were caught on 9/11/01 operating in teams with vans full of explosives, including one team who attempted to blow up the George Washington Bridge with a truck packed with tons of explosives, and another who blew up a van between 6th and 7th on King Street with a mural painted of a remote controlled airplane diving into New York and blowing up; it was Israelis, which is why the authorities did their best to ignore and bury these reports which included a suspected van bomb driven into the WTC basement and exploded to weaken the structure.
Read more with links here.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Alex Jones Finally Comes Clean
Listen to Alex Jones coming clean [here] on the zionist stranglehold of our country. Oh, this must have hurt for Alex. But since zionist Alex can do it, hopefully many American jewish sychophants can also come out of denial as well.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Michael Hoffman's Excellent Comments on the Ft. Hood...event
Interviewer: Why have you termed it "Fort Hoodwink"?
Hoffman: The masons have many occult sayings that have become part of our common parlance, such as: on the level; square deal, hoodwink, etc. In masonry a hoodwink is a synonym for the secrecy with which masonic rites are kept from the prying, unhallowed eyes of the "profane."
Interviewer: What would you say is the most striking aspect of the Fort Hood shootings?
Hoffman: There are so many anomalies, things that just don't add up, but rather than going into hypotheses that would be difficult for most people to follow, I'll focus on something glaring, which is -- the rush to judgment of Hasan -- the total mockery of the ancient right of innocent until proven guilty.
Interviewer: You mean in naming Major Hasan as the shooter and the only shooter?
Hoffman: Yes, that's part of it. Even if he was the gunman, however, even if he was indeed another lone nut, the precedent that's been set here by the government's mouthpiece corporate media is dreadful. They report as fact whatever the government chooses to tell them. Notice too that the Glenn Beck anti-government rebels believe the government in this Texas case, just like Beck believes the government narrative in the 9/11 attacks. It's remarkable, this bipolar suspension of the suspicion of government when it comes to official accounts of shootings, wars and terrorist attacks.
Interviewer: Anything else?
Hoffman: In addition to proclaiming Major Hasan guilty until proven innocent, the effect of Fort Hoodwink on the public, as filtered through the media, is to induce in the American people one of the lowest, dumbest, golem-like mentalities of obtuseness.
Interviewer: That's insulting to your fellow Americans.
Hoffman: They insult themselves by their behavior. A friend in California who is one of the few honest attorneys e-mailed me and pointed out that if there were two or more shooters, as eyewitnesses initially reported, then it could be that one or more of them is one of the "victims" mourned by Obama today.
Interviewer: You're blaming the victims?
Hoffman: How do we know they're all victims? Tell me how we know that every one of the dead in Fort Hood is a victim of Hasan, a mere 100 or so hours after the shooting? Give me a break. Let's dispense with the boy scout gullibility. Assassination tactics sometimes entail a backup shooter to eliminate the main shooter after the job is done. This was the m.o. when the head of the Columbo crime family was shot in New York in 1971. The assassin himself was immediately shot by a second assassin put in place for that very task.
Interviewer: Major Hasan may have killed the shooter or shooters responsible for the killings at Fort Hood?
Hoffman: I don't know if he did or didn't, but it's certainly a possibility given early reports of "eyewitness testimony" of more than one shooter. Consider a plausible scenario: Hasan is told he's going to stop a mass murder and he's sent in for that very reason and then after he kills the actual shooter or shooters he's left holding the bag.
Interviewer: You think the President may have honored one of the killers at today's (Nov. 10) memorial service for the victims? You're saying that one of those mourned as a victim was actually a perpetrator?
Hoffman: Stranger things have been known to happen. What I do know for certain, as a reporter who investigated crime cases for the Associated Press in New York, is what every cop and detective worth his salt knows, that a crime like this cannot be neatly wrapped up and tied in a ribbon a few days after it was committed. Today's presidential memorial service in Fort Hood, centering on Obama's speech, was a way of preempting questions that should be asked but are not being asked. Instead, only approved questions are getting asked.
Interviewer: Such as?
Hoffman: Such as, to what extent was this a Muslim extremist conspiracy. Those are the only kind of questions that are being allowed or encouraged.
Interviewer: If it's so obvious that there's more to it, why don't more people see what you see?
Hoffman: Mass hypnotism. As Charles Fort once said, the proper hypnotic belief has been induced and people believe properly. That's been the story of humanity from time immemorial, but Americans are too puffed up on their own pride to believe that they are susceptible to hypnotic cues. They discount their hypnotic susceptibility, which makes them ideal hypnotic subjects.
Interviewer: What's the main objective of the operation in Fort Hood, if it was actually a government set-up?
Hoffman: First and foremost is the precedent of a mouthpiece media acting as a shill for the government. It happened in the aftermath of Sept. 11 and it's happening in the aftermath of the 5th of November. People are getting conditioned to axiomatic belief in what the government decrees where violent crimes or wars are involved. They won't believe Obama on health care, abortion or gun control, but they'll believe him when it comes to Fort Hood. Even the enemies of the Obama administration are seen to believe the administration in this case. That's a very powerful precedent and it's intended to apply under a Republican or a Democratic administration. Believe and obey what they say when the guns begin to fire, and Americans by and large do, without doubting or revolting.
We are losing our humanity. We're so dumbed down, even as our digital gadgets and personal computers evolve to ever higher planes of magical realism. The alchemical component in this process, the real alchemy, is not base metals into gold, it is the gold of humanity coagulated into the basest shadow of what it means to be human; voila -- human alchemy. Mozart portrayed something along these lines in his "Magic Flute" opera, shortly before his untimely sudden death and the disappearance of his corpse.
Interviewer: Any other dimension to this that benefits the powers that be?
Hoffman: There is the stirring of the embers of hatred for Muslims and Islam, the "clash of civilizations;" the idea that we can terror-bomb Afghan wedding parties and dismiss it as "collateral damage" and still consider ourselves heroes and sleep well at night -- although many front-line American troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are not sleeping well at night, because they still have a conscience, unlike the top brass. But no Afghan is supposed to send any avenging troops against us, here in America, to defend the lives of Afghan people from our bombs. We claim that right while we deny it to them. That's Talmudic.
The test of the justice of any law is its universality. When you have one law for the agents of the American empire and another for the people of the Third World, you have a rabbinic standard. Yesterday the head of a Talmud school (yeshiva) in the occupied Palestinian territories, Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, published a book, The King's Torah, calling for the murder of the children and infants of gentiles who thwart "Israel."
Almost no one among the super-patriots who have methodically studied the "evils" of the religion of Islam from alpha to omega, knows anything about this rabbi's ruling, or many similar rulings from what are called, in Judaism, the "posikim." It's rabbinic theology like this that got 1400 Palestinians slaughtered last December and January. But to the superior Talmudic mind, what is done to the inferior non-Talmudic being doesn't register. Victims of Zionism and Talmudism have no right to fight back. "Christian" America has adopted this Talmudic standard. Palestinian resistance is completely illegitimate in the eyes of contemporary Western governments and media.
This applies to resistance by all Muslims anywhere, unless it involves Muslims battling against Christians like the Serbs, who the Cryptocracy also fear, as apart of a resurgent Russia and Russian Orthodox Church, which is a hereditary enemy of Judaics like the recently deceased physicist Vitaly Ginzburg, one of the architects of the Soviet atomic bomb. In the case of Serbia, the Cryptocracy played the Muslims against the Serbs and NATO terror-bombed Serbia for weeks, "in defense of Muslim civilians." Yeah, right.
I would add that in this age of instant communication and a dearth of deep reflection or contemplation, we have been given the illusion that a man can be justly tried and convicted in the media of all places, of a heinous crime, in the space of five days. We're speeding everything up to the detriment of thought and reflection -- or for that matter, serious thought at all. Fort Hood is an example of this. We've become nerve-endings tethered to Twitter, the Internet and simplistic "solutions" to what are, at the very least, mysterious and complex criminal cases with plaintiffs and defendants that deserve a fair test of evidence and a suspension of belief in the guilt of the accused. All that is lost here. Suddenly in Hasan's case, the Constitution doesn't apply. He's guilty of everything General Cone and Fox News say he did. Period. Unless they change the script and then we'll believe the new script and mentally discard the old one. This is the essence of programming.
Interviewer: What criminal cases have you investigated as a reporter?
Hoffman: The big ones have been the Double Initial murders in Rochester, New York, which is still an open case; the Son of Sam murders in New York City; and the Unabomber. Those are three that I worked on personally; others I have sleuthed long distance, but with those three I was actively involved with the investigation. All three cases are discussed in my book, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.
Interviewer: Are you optimistic about the future in terms of solving the conspiracies we have today?
Hoffman: Not all of them are necessarily conspiracies. But Fort Hood obviously stinks, at least that's what my instincts tell me. The way they resurrected Hasan from the dead -- he either survived when he wasn't supposed to, or they changed the script and decided he was worth more to them alive than dead, in terms of a courtroom circus and show-trial; especially if he's medicated, as I believe Ted Kaczynski was at his sentencing.
The shootings in Texas happened on what is known legally as a military reservation; that means witnesses and bystanders are constrained under loyalty and secrecy oaths by reason of their military service and by reason of where the shootings took place.
Interviewer: Any disadvantages for the System in the Fort Hood killings?
Hoffman: Muslims the world over are enraged at how Americans and Israelis treat the most defenseless civilians in their families and neighborhoods as so much crap to be flushed. When we kill their grandmothers, brothers, mothers and babies we refuse to take responsibility for our crimes. We call them collateral damage. We say the child-victims we kill were killed while being callously used as "human shields" -- which is a neocon canard refuted in Gaza by the Goldstone Report. What we've done in Iraq and Afghanistan, and what our Israeli "ally" has perpetrated in Lebanon and occupied Palestine, is the slaughter of dehumanized Arabs, some of whom are Christians, and of course many of whom are Muslim; all are less than zero in the eyes of the Cryptocracy and for that matter, large segments of the American population.
Americans are okay with this because our victims are not wealthy whites or Freemasons; they're not "Jews," so who cares? But the fact is, the Muslims care, and the awful blowback from the "clash of civilizations" which the Cryptocracy so assiduously wants to escalate into generational, perpetual war for perpetual "peace and democracy," is that it is a war we can't possibly win.
Zionists, Orthodox rabbis and occultists are ultimately self-destructive; they serve a god with no loyalty to them. They are coffin riders hurtling this planet into a conflagration, the only actual beneficiary of which is the devil. The disadvantage for the System in this case is that Major Hasan the cartoon-monster --as opposed to Major Hasan the actual man -- is now a figure of heroic avenging resistance to millions of Muslims worldwide who have been on the receiving end of the Cryptocracy's "power over the air,'" which they ritually cultivated with their parrot familiars long before they gained actual air force power over the civilizations of the Near East.
Interviewer: What are "parrot familiars"?
Hoffman: We'll save that for some other time.
Source is here.
Hoffman: The masons have many occult sayings that have become part of our common parlance, such as: on the level; square deal, hoodwink, etc. In masonry a hoodwink is a synonym for the secrecy with which masonic rites are kept from the prying, unhallowed eyes of the "profane."
Interviewer: What would you say is the most striking aspect of the Fort Hood shootings?
Hoffman: There are so many anomalies, things that just don't add up, but rather than going into hypotheses that would be difficult for most people to follow, I'll focus on something glaring, which is -- the rush to judgment of Hasan -- the total mockery of the ancient right of innocent until proven guilty.
Interviewer: You mean in naming Major Hasan as the shooter and the only shooter?
Hoffman: Yes, that's part of it. Even if he was the gunman, however, even if he was indeed another lone nut, the precedent that's been set here by the government's mouthpiece corporate media is dreadful. They report as fact whatever the government chooses to tell them. Notice too that the Glenn Beck anti-government rebels believe the government in this Texas case, just like Beck believes the government narrative in the 9/11 attacks. It's remarkable, this bipolar suspension of the suspicion of government when it comes to official accounts of shootings, wars and terrorist attacks.
Interviewer: Anything else?
Hoffman: In addition to proclaiming Major Hasan guilty until proven innocent, the effect of Fort Hoodwink on the public, as filtered through the media, is to induce in the American people one of the lowest, dumbest, golem-like mentalities of obtuseness.
Interviewer: That's insulting to your fellow Americans.
Hoffman: They insult themselves by their behavior. A friend in California who is one of the few honest attorneys e-mailed me and pointed out that if there were two or more shooters, as eyewitnesses initially reported, then it could be that one or more of them is one of the "victims" mourned by Obama today.
Interviewer: You're blaming the victims?
Hoffman: How do we know they're all victims? Tell me how we know that every one of the dead in Fort Hood is a victim of Hasan, a mere 100 or so hours after the shooting? Give me a break. Let's dispense with the boy scout gullibility. Assassination tactics sometimes entail a backup shooter to eliminate the main shooter after the job is done. This was the m.o. when the head of the Columbo crime family was shot in New York in 1971. The assassin himself was immediately shot by a second assassin put in place for that very task.
Interviewer: Major Hasan may have killed the shooter or shooters responsible for the killings at Fort Hood?
Hoffman: I don't know if he did or didn't, but it's certainly a possibility given early reports of "eyewitness testimony" of more than one shooter. Consider a plausible scenario: Hasan is told he's going to stop a mass murder and he's sent in for that very reason and then after he kills the actual shooter or shooters he's left holding the bag.
Interviewer: You think the President may have honored one of the killers at today's (Nov. 10) memorial service for the victims? You're saying that one of those mourned as a victim was actually a perpetrator?
Hoffman: Stranger things have been known to happen. What I do know for certain, as a reporter who investigated crime cases for the Associated Press in New York, is what every cop and detective worth his salt knows, that a crime like this cannot be neatly wrapped up and tied in a ribbon a few days after it was committed. Today's presidential memorial service in Fort Hood, centering on Obama's speech, was a way of preempting questions that should be asked but are not being asked. Instead, only approved questions are getting asked.
Interviewer: Such as?
Hoffman: Such as, to what extent was this a Muslim extremist conspiracy. Those are the only kind of questions that are being allowed or encouraged.
Interviewer: If it's so obvious that there's more to it, why don't more people see what you see?
Hoffman: Mass hypnotism. As Charles Fort once said, the proper hypnotic belief has been induced and people believe properly. That's been the story of humanity from time immemorial, but Americans are too puffed up on their own pride to believe that they are susceptible to hypnotic cues. They discount their hypnotic susceptibility, which makes them ideal hypnotic subjects.
Interviewer: What's the main objective of the operation in Fort Hood, if it was actually a government set-up?
Hoffman: First and foremost is the precedent of a mouthpiece media acting as a shill for the government. It happened in the aftermath of Sept. 11 and it's happening in the aftermath of the 5th of November. People are getting conditioned to axiomatic belief in what the government decrees where violent crimes or wars are involved. They won't believe Obama on health care, abortion or gun control, but they'll believe him when it comes to Fort Hood. Even the enemies of the Obama administration are seen to believe the administration in this case. That's a very powerful precedent and it's intended to apply under a Republican or a Democratic administration. Believe and obey what they say when the guns begin to fire, and Americans by and large do, without doubting or revolting.
We are losing our humanity. We're so dumbed down, even as our digital gadgets and personal computers evolve to ever higher planes of magical realism. The alchemical component in this process, the real alchemy, is not base metals into gold, it is the gold of humanity coagulated into the basest shadow of what it means to be human; voila -- human alchemy. Mozart portrayed something along these lines in his "Magic Flute" opera, shortly before his untimely sudden death and the disappearance of his corpse.
Interviewer: Any other dimension to this that benefits the powers that be?
Hoffman: There is the stirring of the embers of hatred for Muslims and Islam, the "clash of civilizations;" the idea that we can terror-bomb Afghan wedding parties and dismiss it as "collateral damage" and still consider ourselves heroes and sleep well at night -- although many front-line American troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are not sleeping well at night, because they still have a conscience, unlike the top brass. But no Afghan is supposed to send any avenging troops against us, here in America, to defend the lives of Afghan people from our bombs. We claim that right while we deny it to them. That's Talmudic.
The test of the justice of any law is its universality. When you have one law for the agents of the American empire and another for the people of the Third World, you have a rabbinic standard. Yesterday the head of a Talmud school (yeshiva) in the occupied Palestinian territories, Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, published a book, The King's Torah, calling for the murder of the children and infants of gentiles who thwart "Israel."
Almost no one among the super-patriots who have methodically studied the "evils" of the religion of Islam from alpha to omega, knows anything about this rabbi's ruling, or many similar rulings from what are called, in Judaism, the "posikim." It's rabbinic theology like this that got 1400 Palestinians slaughtered last December and January. But to the superior Talmudic mind, what is done to the inferior non-Talmudic being doesn't register. Victims of Zionism and Talmudism have no right to fight back. "Christian" America has adopted this Talmudic standard. Palestinian resistance is completely illegitimate in the eyes of contemporary Western governments and media.
This applies to resistance by all Muslims anywhere, unless it involves Muslims battling against Christians like the Serbs, who the Cryptocracy also fear, as apart of a resurgent Russia and Russian Orthodox Church, which is a hereditary enemy of Judaics like the recently deceased physicist Vitaly Ginzburg, one of the architects of the Soviet atomic bomb. In the case of Serbia, the Cryptocracy played the Muslims against the Serbs and NATO terror-bombed Serbia for weeks, "in defense of Muslim civilians." Yeah, right.
I would add that in this age of instant communication and a dearth of deep reflection or contemplation, we have been given the illusion that a man can be justly tried and convicted in the media of all places, of a heinous crime, in the space of five days. We're speeding everything up to the detriment of thought and reflection -- or for that matter, serious thought at all. Fort Hood is an example of this. We've become nerve-endings tethered to Twitter, the Internet and simplistic "solutions" to what are, at the very least, mysterious and complex criminal cases with plaintiffs and defendants that deserve a fair test of evidence and a suspension of belief in the guilt of the accused. All that is lost here. Suddenly in Hasan's case, the Constitution doesn't apply. He's guilty of everything General Cone and Fox News say he did. Period. Unless they change the script and then we'll believe the new script and mentally discard the old one. This is the essence of programming.
Interviewer: What criminal cases have you investigated as a reporter?
Hoffman: The big ones have been the Double Initial murders in Rochester, New York, which is still an open case; the Son of Sam murders in New York City; and the Unabomber. Those are three that I worked on personally; others I have sleuthed long distance, but with those three I was actively involved with the investigation. All three cases are discussed in my book, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.
Interviewer: Are you optimistic about the future in terms of solving the conspiracies we have today?
Hoffman: Not all of them are necessarily conspiracies. But Fort Hood obviously stinks, at least that's what my instincts tell me. The way they resurrected Hasan from the dead -- he either survived when he wasn't supposed to, or they changed the script and decided he was worth more to them alive than dead, in terms of a courtroom circus and show-trial; especially if he's medicated, as I believe Ted Kaczynski was at his sentencing.
The shootings in Texas happened on what is known legally as a military reservation; that means witnesses and bystanders are constrained under loyalty and secrecy oaths by reason of their military service and by reason of where the shootings took place.
Interviewer: Any disadvantages for the System in the Fort Hood killings?
Hoffman: Muslims the world over are enraged at how Americans and Israelis treat the most defenseless civilians in their families and neighborhoods as so much crap to be flushed. When we kill their grandmothers, brothers, mothers and babies we refuse to take responsibility for our crimes. We call them collateral damage. We say the child-victims we kill were killed while being callously used as "human shields" -- which is a neocon canard refuted in Gaza by the Goldstone Report. What we've done in Iraq and Afghanistan, and what our Israeli "ally" has perpetrated in Lebanon and occupied Palestine, is the slaughter of dehumanized Arabs, some of whom are Christians, and of course many of whom are Muslim; all are less than zero in the eyes of the Cryptocracy and for that matter, large segments of the American population.
Americans are okay with this because our victims are not wealthy whites or Freemasons; they're not "Jews," so who cares? But the fact is, the Muslims care, and the awful blowback from the "clash of civilizations" which the Cryptocracy so assiduously wants to escalate into generational, perpetual war for perpetual "peace and democracy," is that it is a war we can't possibly win.
Zionists, Orthodox rabbis and occultists are ultimately self-destructive; they serve a god with no loyalty to them. They are coffin riders hurtling this planet into a conflagration, the only actual beneficiary of which is the devil. The disadvantage for the System in this case is that Major Hasan the cartoon-monster --as opposed to Major Hasan the actual man -- is now a figure of heroic avenging resistance to millions of Muslims worldwide who have been on the receiving end of the Cryptocracy's "power over the air,'" which they ritually cultivated with their parrot familiars long before they gained actual air force power over the civilizations of the Near East.
Interviewer: What are "parrot familiars"?
Hoffman: We'll save that for some other time.
Source is here.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Veteran: US Military Is Spreading Death
Americans should find some other way to get their kicks and pretexts for patriotic accolades than shooting up people in third world countries for the sake of making their people fellow slaves to their jewish zionist lords.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Saturday, October 31, 2009
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Read them before discounting them as a canard. Read them, then try to deny that what they convey is not true...and unfolding.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Turkish PM: Israel's Use of WMD on Civilians in Gaza a Fact
Damascus, (SANA) – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Sunday that the use of weapons of mass destruction by Israel is a fact, and that it is unfair to remain silent while civilians are targeted with white phosphorus bombs.
In a television interview, Erdogan added that despite the passing of almost nine months since the Gaza events and almost seven months since the donor conference in Sharm al-Sheikh, nothing was achieved regarding the promised reconstruction process due to the Israeli siege that prevents building materials from entering or reaching Gaza.
He pointed out that there are atrocities uncovered by Goldstone report, which was voted for by the Human Rights Council, calling on the UN take a serious stance in that regard and assume its responsibilities towards putting that report into use.
"Turkey will follow the fate of the Goldstone report at the UN until the end," Erdogan affirmed, demanding that the people responsible for this report continue pursuing it until a result is achieved.
He noted that Israel didn't stop at murdering Palestinians by the hundreds, but also destroyed hospital, infrastructure and schools in Gaza, including a UN school.
On Turkey's decision to cancel Israel's participation in the "Anadolu Eagle" maneuvers, Erdogan stressed that these maneuvers are Turkish, so Turkey will decide who can participate in them, and that no-one can impose anything on Turkey in that regard.
"Previously, Israel participated in these maneuvers upon our invitation, but now because of the war on Gaza we decided not to invite Israel in response to the will of the Turkish street, which was deeply affected by the atrocity of the Israeli aggression," he explained.
Erdogan went on to say that no-one can justify killing 1500 women and children using deadly weapons of mass destruction, wounding over 4000 civilians, and destroying hospitals, schools and infrastructure, noting that Israel used its deadliest weapons in an uneven battle, which cannot be justified.
Regarding the growing relations between Turkey and the region's countries, the Turkish Premier said that signing agreements for establishing strategic cooperation councils with Syria and Iraq are important steps, particularly since they involve strategic cooperation in the economic field which should connect these countries and improve relations between them.
Erdogan affirmed that these agreements are in the interest of the three countries, establishing the basis of a triangle of mutual interests in the region that will increase the volume of exchanged investments, leading to further coordination and cooperation on the political level based on mutual interests.
He also affirmed his country's commitment towards Iraq in the fields of education, training Iraqi forces, security, establishing schools and hospitals, transport and energy.
On Turkey's stance regarding the Iranian nuclear issue, the Turkish Premier affirmed that his country wants to remove nuclear weapons from the Middle East, saying that it is unfair and unacceptable for one country to have nuclear weapons and ignore that and focus on Iran, which says that its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes.
He called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to expand its search to include non-member countries through a mechanism devised by the UN to inspect the nuclear facilities in these countries.
"How can countries that possess weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, seek to punish Iran? Do those who possess weapons have the right to demand that others not possess them?" Erdogan concluded.
Source article is here.
Israel also threatened to nuke Gaza.
P.S. Just who are the radicals in the Middle East?
In a television interview, Erdogan added that despite the passing of almost nine months since the Gaza events and almost seven months since the donor conference in Sharm al-Sheikh, nothing was achieved regarding the promised reconstruction process due to the Israeli siege that prevents building materials from entering or reaching Gaza.
He pointed out that there are atrocities uncovered by Goldstone report, which was voted for by the Human Rights Council, calling on the UN take a serious stance in that regard and assume its responsibilities towards putting that report into use.
"Turkey will follow the fate of the Goldstone report at the UN until the end," Erdogan affirmed, demanding that the people responsible for this report continue pursuing it until a result is achieved.
He noted that Israel didn't stop at murdering Palestinians by the hundreds, but also destroyed hospital, infrastructure and schools in Gaza, including a UN school.
On Turkey's decision to cancel Israel's participation in the "Anadolu Eagle" maneuvers, Erdogan stressed that these maneuvers are Turkish, so Turkey will decide who can participate in them, and that no-one can impose anything on Turkey in that regard.
"Previously, Israel participated in these maneuvers upon our invitation, but now because of the war on Gaza we decided not to invite Israel in response to the will of the Turkish street, which was deeply affected by the atrocity of the Israeli aggression," he explained.
Erdogan went on to say that no-one can justify killing 1500 women and children using deadly weapons of mass destruction, wounding over 4000 civilians, and destroying hospitals, schools and infrastructure, noting that Israel used its deadliest weapons in an uneven battle, which cannot be justified.
Regarding the growing relations between Turkey and the region's countries, the Turkish Premier said that signing agreements for establishing strategic cooperation councils with Syria and Iraq are important steps, particularly since they involve strategic cooperation in the economic field which should connect these countries and improve relations between them.
Erdogan affirmed that these agreements are in the interest of the three countries, establishing the basis of a triangle of mutual interests in the region that will increase the volume of exchanged investments, leading to further coordination and cooperation on the political level based on mutual interests.
He also affirmed his country's commitment towards Iraq in the fields of education, training Iraqi forces, security, establishing schools and hospitals, transport and energy.
On Turkey's stance regarding the Iranian nuclear issue, the Turkish Premier affirmed that his country wants to remove nuclear weapons from the Middle East, saying that it is unfair and unacceptable for one country to have nuclear weapons and ignore that and focus on Iran, which says that its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes.
He called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to expand its search to include non-member countries through a mechanism devised by the UN to inspect the nuclear facilities in these countries.
"How can countries that possess weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, seek to punish Iran? Do those who possess weapons have the right to demand that others not possess them?" Erdogan concluded.
Source article is here.
Israel also threatened to nuke Gaza.
P.S. Just who are the radicals in the Middle East?
Let the US Citizenry Eat Cake
Evidence that the US is a failed state is piling up faster than I can record it.
One conclusive hallmark of a failed state is that the crooks are inside the government, using government to protect and to advance their private interests.
Another conclusive hallmark is rising income inequality as the insiders manipulate economic policy for their enrichment at the expense of everyone else.
Income inequality in the US is now the most extreme of all countries. The 2008 OECD report, “Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries,” concludes that the US is the country with the highest inequality and poverty rate across the OECD and that since 2000 nowhere has there been such a stark rise in income inequality as in the US. The OECD finds that in the US the distribution of wealth is even more unequal than the distribution of income.
On October 21, 2009, Business Week highlighted a new report from the United Nations Development Program concluded that the US ranked third among states with the worst income inequality. As number one and number two, Hong Kong and Singapore, are both essentially city states, not countries, the US actually has the shame of being the country with the most inequality in the distribution of income.
The stark increase in US income inequality in the 21st century coincides with the offshoring of US jobs, which enriched executives with “performance bonuses” while impoverishing the middle class, and with the rapid rise of unregulated OTC derivatives, which enriched Wall Street and the financial sector at the expense of everyone else.
Millions of Americans have lost their homes and half of their retirement savings while being loaded up with government debt to bail out the banksters who created the derivative crisis.
Frontline’s October 21 broadcast, “The Warning,” documents how Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt blocked Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, from performing her statutory duties and regulating OTC derivatives.
After the worst crisis in US financial history struck, just as Brooksley Born said it would, a disgraced Alan Greenspan was summoned out of retirement to explain to Congress his unequivocal assurances that no regulation of derivatives was necessary. Greenspan had even told Congress that regulation of derivatives would be harmful. A pathetic Greenspan had to admit that the free market ideology on which he had relied turned out to have a flaw.
Greenspan may have bet our country on his free market ideology, but does anyone believe that Rubin and Summers were doing anything other than protecting the enormous fraud-based profits that derivatives were bringing Wall Street? As Brooksley Born stressed, OTC derivatives are a “dark market.” There is no transparency. Regulators have no information on them and neither do purchasers.
Even after Long Term Capital Management blew up in 1998 and had to be bailed out, Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers stuck to their guns. Greenspan, Rubin and Summers, and a roped-in gullible Arthur Levitt who now regrets that he was the banksters’ dupe, succeeded in manipulating a totally ignorant Congress into blocking the CFTC from doing its mandated job. Brooksley Born, prevented by the public’s elected representatives from protecting the public, resigned. Wall Street money simply shoved facts and honest regulators aside, guaranteeing government inaction and the financial crisis that hit in 2008 and continues to plague our economy today.
The financial insiders running the Treasury, White House, and Federal Reserve shifted to taxpayers the cost of the catastrophe that they had created. When the crisis hit, Henry Paulson, appointed by President Bush as Rubin’s replacement as the Goldman Sachs representative running the US Treasury, hyped fear to obtain from “our” representatives in Congress with no questions asked hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars (TARP money) to bail out Goldman Sachs and the other malefactors of unregulated derivatives.
When Goldman Sachs recently announced that it was paying massive six and seven figure bonuses to every employee, public outrage erupted. In defense of banksters, saved with the public’s money, paying themselves bonuses in excess of most people’s life-time earnings, Lord Griffiths, Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, said that the public must learn to “tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity for all.”
In other words, “Let them eat cake.”
According to the UN report cited above, Great Britain has the 7th most unequal income distribution in the world. After the Goldman Sachs bonuses, the British will move up in distinction, perhaps rivaling Israel for the fourth spot in the hierarchy.
Despite the total insanity of unregulated derivatives, the high level of public anger, and Greenspan’s confession to Congress, still nothing has been done to regulate derivatives. One of Rubin’s Assistant Treasury Secretaries, Gary Gensler, has replaced Brooksley Born as head of the CFTC. Larry Summers is the head of President Obama’s National Economic Council. Former Federal Reserve official Timothy Geithner, a Paulson protege, runs the Obama Treasury. A Goldman Sachs vice president, Adam Storch, has been appointed the chief operating officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Banksters are still in charge.
Is there another country in which in full public view so few so blatantly use government for the enrichment of private interests, with a coterie of “free market” economists available to justify plunder on the grounds that “the market knows best”? A narco-state is bad enough. The US surpasses this horror with its financo-state.
As Brooksley Born says, if nothing is done “it’ll happen again.”
But nothing can be done. The crooks have the government.
Note: The OECD report shows that despite the Reagan tax rate reduction, the rate of increase in US income inequality declined during the Reagan years. During the mid-1990s the Gini coefficient (the measure of income inequality) actually fell. Beginning in 2000 with the New Economy (essentially financial fraud and offshoring of US jobs), the Gini coefficient shot up sharply.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts was found here.
P.S. US Citizenry spokesperson: We like cake. We don't need no stinking jobs or health care. Bring on the next war.
One conclusive hallmark of a failed state is that the crooks are inside the government, using government to protect and to advance their private interests.
Another conclusive hallmark is rising income inequality as the insiders manipulate economic policy for their enrichment at the expense of everyone else.
Income inequality in the US is now the most extreme of all countries. The 2008 OECD report, “Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries,” concludes that the US is the country with the highest inequality and poverty rate across the OECD and that since 2000 nowhere has there been such a stark rise in income inequality as in the US. The OECD finds that in the US the distribution of wealth is even more unequal than the distribution of income.
On October 21, 2009, Business Week highlighted a new report from the United Nations Development Program concluded that the US ranked third among states with the worst income inequality. As number one and number two, Hong Kong and Singapore, are both essentially city states, not countries, the US actually has the shame of being the country with the most inequality in the distribution of income.
The stark increase in US income inequality in the 21st century coincides with the offshoring of US jobs, which enriched executives with “performance bonuses” while impoverishing the middle class, and with the rapid rise of unregulated OTC derivatives, which enriched Wall Street and the financial sector at the expense of everyone else.
Millions of Americans have lost their homes and half of their retirement savings while being loaded up with government debt to bail out the banksters who created the derivative crisis.
Frontline’s October 21 broadcast, “The Warning,” documents how Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt blocked Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, from performing her statutory duties and regulating OTC derivatives.
After the worst crisis in US financial history struck, just as Brooksley Born said it would, a disgraced Alan Greenspan was summoned out of retirement to explain to Congress his unequivocal assurances that no regulation of derivatives was necessary. Greenspan had even told Congress that regulation of derivatives would be harmful. A pathetic Greenspan had to admit that the free market ideology on which he had relied turned out to have a flaw.
Greenspan may have bet our country on his free market ideology, but does anyone believe that Rubin and Summers were doing anything other than protecting the enormous fraud-based profits that derivatives were bringing Wall Street? As Brooksley Born stressed, OTC derivatives are a “dark market.” There is no transparency. Regulators have no information on them and neither do purchasers.
Even after Long Term Capital Management blew up in 1998 and had to be bailed out, Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers stuck to their guns. Greenspan, Rubin and Summers, and a roped-in gullible Arthur Levitt who now regrets that he was the banksters’ dupe, succeeded in manipulating a totally ignorant Congress into blocking the CFTC from doing its mandated job. Brooksley Born, prevented by the public’s elected representatives from protecting the public, resigned. Wall Street money simply shoved facts and honest regulators aside, guaranteeing government inaction and the financial crisis that hit in 2008 and continues to plague our economy today.
The financial insiders running the Treasury, White House, and Federal Reserve shifted to taxpayers the cost of the catastrophe that they had created. When the crisis hit, Henry Paulson, appointed by President Bush as Rubin’s replacement as the Goldman Sachs representative running the US Treasury, hyped fear to obtain from “our” representatives in Congress with no questions asked hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars (TARP money) to bail out Goldman Sachs and the other malefactors of unregulated derivatives.
When Goldman Sachs recently announced that it was paying massive six and seven figure bonuses to every employee, public outrage erupted. In defense of banksters, saved with the public’s money, paying themselves bonuses in excess of most people’s life-time earnings, Lord Griffiths, Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, said that the public must learn to “tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity for all.”
In other words, “Let them eat cake.”
According to the UN report cited above, Great Britain has the 7th most unequal income distribution in the world. After the Goldman Sachs bonuses, the British will move up in distinction, perhaps rivaling Israel for the fourth spot in the hierarchy.
Despite the total insanity of unregulated derivatives, the high level of public anger, and Greenspan’s confession to Congress, still nothing has been done to regulate derivatives. One of Rubin’s Assistant Treasury Secretaries, Gary Gensler, has replaced Brooksley Born as head of the CFTC. Larry Summers is the head of President Obama’s National Economic Council. Former Federal Reserve official Timothy Geithner, a Paulson protege, runs the Obama Treasury. A Goldman Sachs vice president, Adam Storch, has been appointed the chief operating officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Banksters are still in charge.
Is there another country in which in full public view so few so blatantly use government for the enrichment of private interests, with a coterie of “free market” economists available to justify plunder on the grounds that “the market knows best”? A narco-state is bad enough. The US surpasses this horror with its financo-state.
As Brooksley Born says, if nothing is done “it’ll happen again.”
But nothing can be done. The crooks have the government.
Note: The OECD report shows that despite the Reagan tax rate reduction, the rate of increase in US income inequality declined during the Reagan years. During the mid-1990s the Gini coefficient (the measure of income inequality) actually fell. Beginning in 2000 with the New Economy (essentially financial fraud and offshoring of US jobs), the Gini coefficient shot up sharply.
Source article by Paul Craig Roberts was found here.
P.S. US Citizenry spokesperson: We like cake. We don't need no stinking jobs or health care. Bring on the next war.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
